Performance measurement systems in the European Knowledge Innovation Communities

Author/s Fabio Donato
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/1
Language Italian Pages 14 P. 45-58 File size 198 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2022-001004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Sustainability-oriented organizations set social and environmental objectives by combining them with economic and financial goals. The manner of integrating these objectives must take into account the needs of the various stakeholders, the activities that an organization carries out, the products/services it offers, and the characteristics of its internal resources. In this article, the problem of the integration between social and economic objectives is analyzed in the context of the Knowledge Innovation Communities, that are created by the European Institute of Innovation and Technologies (EIT) to achieve the EIT’s mission of boosting innovation in Europe and creating the entrepreneurs of tomorrow. The study focuses on the role that the performance measurement systems (PMS) play to support the implementation of a sustainability strategy in the KICs. The analysis highlights the need to develop hybrid PMS based on the use of social (non-financial) performance indicators (e.g., support for product and process innovations, start-up creation) and financial indicators. Particularly, the financial performance constitutes the most critical aspect for the sustainability of these organizations in the long term.

Keywords: Social performance, Performance measurement systems, Knowledge Innovation Communities

  1. Anselmi L. (1995), Il processo di trasformazione della pubblica amministrazione. Il percorso aziendale, Giappichelli.
  2. Arru M. (2014), Application of Process Ontology to Improve the Funding Allocation Process at the European Institute of Innovation and Technology, in Kő A., Francesconi E., Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective, Springer.
  3. Bertini U. (1990), Scritti di politica aziendale, Giappichelli.
  4. Bianchi P., Labory S. (2016), Towards a new industrial policy, Mc Graw-Hill Education.
  5. Bianchi Martini S., Corvino A., Rocchiccioli E. (2019), Governare strategicamente l’azienda. Una mappa per orientare l’analisi, Giappichelli.
  6. Barontini R., Cinquini L., Giannetti R., Tenucci A. (2012), Models of performance and value measurement in service systems, in L. Cinquini, A. Di Minin, R. Varaldo, New Business Models and Value Creation: A Service Science Perspective, Springer.
  7. Donato F. (2013), La crisi sprecata, Aracne.
  8. Giannessi E. (1970), Appunti di economia aziendale, Libreria scientifica Pellegrini.
  9. Giovanelli L. (1999), Il controllo di gestione negli enti pubblici di ricerca, Giappichelli.
  10. Gornitzka A., Metz J. (2014), European institution building under inhospitable conditions - the unlikely establishment of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology, in M. Chou, A. Gornitzka., Building the Knowledge Economy in Europe. New Constellations in European Research and Higher Education Governance, ElgarOnline.
  11. Huisman J., de Jong D. (2014), The Construction of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology: The Realisation of an Ambiguous Policy Idea, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 6(3), pp. 291-307.
  12. Ivanova O., Kanks D., Thissen, M. (2019), EU economic modelling system: Assessment of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) investments in innovation and human capital, in EERI Research Paper Series, (10), pp. 291-307.
  13. Jones P.D. (2008), The European Institute of Technology and the Europe of Knowledge: a research agenda, Journal of European Integration, 36(4), pp. 357-374.
  14. Jofre S., Andersen P.D. (2009), A triple Helix Approach to the Future Innovation Flagship of Europe: Exploring the Strategic Deployment of the European Institute of Innovation and Technology, in Proceedings of the Triple Helix VII 7th Biennial International Conference on University, Industry and Government Linkages (Vol. VII, pp. 1-6). University of Strathclyde.
  15. Lattanzi N. (2012), Azienda, uomo e neuroscienze. Processi decisionali e pensiero strategico, Mc Graw-Hill.
  16. Mancini D. (2010), Il sistema informativo e di controllo relazionale per il governo della rete di relazioni collaborative d’azienda, Giuffré.
  17. Marchi L. (1993), I sistemi informative aziendali, Giuffré.
  18. Marchi L., Quagli A., Paolini A. (2003), Strumenti di analisi gestionale, Giappichelli.
  19. Nabradi A. (2010), Role of innovations and knowledge infrastructure and institutions, Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 4(3-4), pp. 7-10.
  20. Paolini A. (1993), Il controllo strategico. Uno schema d’analisi, Giuffré.
  21. Quagli A. (2005), L’informativa volontaria: finalità e rapporti con l’informativa obbligatoria, in A. Quagli, C. Teodori, L’informativa volontaria per settori di attività, FrancoAngeli.
  22. Salajan F.D. (2018), An analysis of rhetorical devices in policy narratives on the European Institute of Innovation and Technology: Implications for European higher education, European Educational Research Journal, 17(4), pp. 555-583.
  23. Unger M., Polt W. (2017), The Knowledge Triangle between Research, Education and Innovation. A Conceptual Discussion, Foresight and STI Governance, 11(2), pp. 10-26.
  24. Zuccardi Merli M. (1999), L’introduzione di criteri economico aziendali negli enti pubblici di ricerca. L’esperienza INFM, vol. I, Giappichelli.

Fabio Donato, I sistemi di monitoraggio delle performance nelle Knowledge Innovation Communities europee in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 1/2022, pp 45-58, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2022-001004