Does institutional quality affect electricity supply? A panel SUR estimation

Titolo Rivista ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Autori/Curatori Alanda Venter, Roula Inglesi-Lotz
Anno di pubblicazione 2022 Fascicolo 2021/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 23 P. 77-99 Dimensione file 1093 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2021-002004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Electricity availability and generation have a significant impact on the economies internationally. Understanding the factors affecting the electricity supply sector is imperative towards improving the industry and achieving a sustainable energy future for all as per the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to 2030. This study mainly focuses on the institutional quality factors that impact the electricity supply of twenty countries, representing various electricity market structures and supply mixes, to derive holistic policy suggestions. Institutional quality will be defined as property rights, corruption perception, voice and accountability, government efficiency, the rule of law and regulatory quality in the study. To do so, a Seemingly Unrelated Regression model will be used for the period 2003 to 2018. The results indicate that improved institutional quality stabilises markets, affecting the electricity supply.

Keywords:energy, institutions, electricity supply, good governance

Jel codes:Q43, Q48, O43

  1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369-1401. -- http://www.jstor.org/stable/2677930
  2. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. Handbook of Economic Growth -- https://economics.mit.edu/files/4469.
  3. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. & Thaicharoen, Y. (2003). Institutional causes, macroeconomic symptoms: Volatility, crises and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(1), 49-123. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00208-8
  4. Adom, P. K., Appiah, M. O. & Agradi, M. P. (2020). Does financial development lower energy intensity?, 14(3), 620-634.
  5. Albassam, B. A. (2020). A model for assessing the efficiency of government expenditure. Cogent Economics and Finance, 8(1). DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2020.1823065
  6. Butkiewicz, J. L. & Yanikkaya, H. (2006). Institutional quality and economic growth: Maintenance of the Rule of law or democratic institutions, or both?. Economic Modelling, 23(4), 648-661. DOI: 10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2006.03.004
  7. Carnegie, A. (2014). States held hostage: Political hold-up problems and the effects of international institutions. American Political Science Review, 108(1), 54-70. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055413000646.
  8. Chaudhry, A. (2010). A panel data analysis of electricity demand in the Pakistani industrial sector. The Labour Journal of Economics, 15, 75-106.
  9. De-Hoyos, R. E. & Sarafidis, V. (2006). Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. The Stata Journal, 6(4), 482-496.
  10. Djankov, S., la Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. & Shleifer, A. (2002). The Regulation of Entry. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1-37. DOI: 10.1162/003355302753399436
  11. Gennaioli, C. & Tavoni, M. (2016). Clean or dirty energy evidence of corruption in the renewable energy sector. Public Choice, 166, 261-290.
  12. Gilbert, D. U., Rasche, A. & Waddock, S. (2011). Accountability in a Global Economy: The Emergence of International Accountability Standards. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 23-44 -- https://www.jstor.org/stable/25763050.
  13. Goldthau, A. & Witte, J. M. (2010). The role of rules and institutions in global energy: an introduction. In: Global public policy institute (pp. 1-21) -- https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/globalenergygovernance_chapter.pdf. Hadhek, Z. & Mrad, F. (2015). Trade Openness, Institutions and Economic Growth, 75, 96-104 -- http://www.europeanjournalofeconomicsfinanceandadministrativesciences.com.
  14. Haydaroğlu, C. (2015). The relationship between property rights and economic growth: An analysis of OECD and EU countries. Danube, 6(4), 217-239.
  15. IEA (2021). Data overview. IEA -- https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics.
  16. Jafee, A. J. & Louziotis JR, D. (1996). Property Rights and Economic Efficiency A Survey of Institutional Factors. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 4(2), 137-159. -- https://www.jstor.org/stable/44103323.
  17. Jalilian, H., Kirkpatrick, C. & Parker, D. (2007). The Impact of Regulation on Economic Growth in Developing Countries: A Cross-Country Analysis. World Development, 35(1), 87-103.
  18. Kahia, M. & Kahouli, B. (2021). Does good governance moderate the financial development-CO2 emissions?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
  19. Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1-44. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
  20. Koeniger, J. & Silberberger, M. (2015). Regulation, trade and economic growth. Econstor, 255 -- www.econstor.EU.
  21. Kumar, N. (2003). Intellectual Property Rights, Technology and Economic Development Experiences of Asian Countries. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(3), 18-24 -- https://www.jstor.org/stable/4413100.
  22. Levin, A., Lin, C.-F. & James Chu, C.-S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and ÿnite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1-24 -- www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase.
  23. Lorizio, M. & Gurrieri, A. R. (2014). Efficiency of Justice and Economic Systems. Procedia Economics and Finance, 17, 104-112.
  24. Lu, J., Ren, L., Qiao, J., Yao, S., Strielkowski, W. & Streimikis, J. (2019). Corporate social
  25. responsibility and corruption: Implications for the sustainable energy sector. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(15).
  26. Lucifora, C. & Moriconi, S. (2015). Political instability and labour market institutions. European Journal of Political Economy, 39, 201-221. DOI: 10.1016/J.EJPOLECO.2015.05.003
  27. Mauro, P. (1998). Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics, 69, 263-279. DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00025-5
  28. Miller, T., Kim, A. B. & Roberts, J. M. (2021). Economic Data and Statistics on World Economy and Economic Freedom -- https://www.heritage.org/index/explore.
  29. Moe, T. M. (2005). Power and Political Institutions on JSTOR. Perspectives on Politics, 3(2), 215-233 -- https://www.jstor.org/stable/3688027.
  30. Nguyen, C. P., Su, T. D. & Nguyen, T. V. H. (2018). Institutional Quality and Economic Growth: The Case of Emerging Economies. Theoretical Economics Letters, 8, 1943-1956.
  31. OECD (2020). Prices – Inflation (CPI) – OECD Data -- https://data.oecd.org/price/inflation-cpi.htm.
  32. Omri, A., Kahia, M. & Kahouli, B. (2021). Does good governance moderate the financial development-CO2 emissions relationship? Environmental Science and Pollution Research.
  33. Transparency International (2020). 2020 – CPI – Transparency.org -- https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzl#.
  34. World Development Indicators (2021). World Development Indicators | DataBank -- https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators.
  35. Andersson, P. F. & Lindvall, J. (2018). Crises, investments, and political institutions. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 30(4), 410-430. DOI: 10.1177/0951629818791032
  36. Asiedu, E. & Freeman, J. (2009). The effect of corruption on investment growth: Evidence from firms in Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa, and transition countries. Review of Development Economics, 13(2), 200-214. DOI: 10.1111/J.1467-9361.2009.00507.X

Alanda Venter, Roula Inglesi-Lotz, Does institutional quality affect electricity supply? A panel SUR estimation in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 2/2021, pp 77-99, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2021-002004