Minorities’ Representativeness on the Board and their Effect on the Level of Compliance with the Italian RPTs Regulation

Author/s Pietro Fera, Rosa Vinciguerra
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/2
Language English Pages 32 P. 57-88 File size 259 KB
DOI 10.3280/FR2022-002003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The definition and regulation of related-party transactions (RPTs) depend mainly on the conceptual framework underlying the interpretation of such a phenomenon. While the conflict of interests hypothesis focuses on opportunistic behaviours, the efficient transaction hypothesis suggests that RPTs lead to more efficient. In such a scenario, instead of providing opposite interpretations, the contingency hypothesis considers the potential risks and benefits associated with specific RPTs, i.e. other contex- tual factors and corporate governance mechanisms. Among the latter, independent di- rectors, empowered by the majority of national legislations worldwide, should play a crucial role in spotlighting opportunistic behaviours to the detriment of minorities. However, in light of the many corporate scandals that have stressed the RPTs’ issues, practitioners and academics have questioned their effectiveness, especially in contexts characterized by high ownership concentration, while leaving room for the so-called minority directors, i.e. independent directors appointed by minority shareholders. On this matter, aiming to analyse the potential impact of minority directors on the level of procedural compliance for the RPTs’ implementation, this empirical study, based on a data set, shows that they represent a more effective tool for the full and strict adoption of the current RPTs regulation, while independent directors fail in their monitoring role and are ineffective in bolstering corporate transparency with regard to RPTs.

Keywords: Related Party Transactions (RPTs), minority directors, independent di- rectors, corporate governance.

Jel codes: G34, G38, G32, M48, M00

  1. Brickley J., Coles J. and Terry R. (1994), Outside Directors and the Adoption of Poison Pills, Journal of Financial Economics, 35(1), pp. 371-32, DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(94)90038-8
  2. Abatecola G., Farina V. and Gordini N. (2014), Board effectiveness in corporate crises: lessons from the evolving empirical research, Corporate Governance: the International Journal of Business in Society, 14(4), pp. 531-542, DOI: 10.1108/CG-03-2013-0030
  3. Abdullah S. N. (2006), Board structure and ownership in Malaysia: the case of dis- tressed listed companies, Corporate Governance: the International Journal of Business in Society, 6(5), pp. 582-594, DOI: 10.1108/14720700610706072
  4. Amiram D., Bozanic Z., Cox J.D., Dupont Q., Karpoff J.M. and, Sloan R. (2018), Financial reporting fraud and other forms of misconduct: a multidisciplinary re- view of the literature, Review of Accounting Studies, 23(2), pp-732-783.,
  5. Arcay M.R.B. and Vázquez M.F.M. (2005), Corporate characteristics, governance rules and the extent of voluntary disclosure in Spain, Advances in Accounting, 21, pp. 299-331, DOI: 10.1016/S0882-6110(05)21013-1
  6. Baek J. S., Kang J. K. and Lee I. (2006), Business groups and tunneling: evidence from private securities offerings by Korean chaebols, The Journal of Finance, 61(5), pp. 2415-2449,
  7. Baek J. S., Kang J. K. and Park K. S. (2004), Corporate governance and firm value: evidence from the Korean financial crisis, Journal of Financial Economics, 71(2), pp. 265-313, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00167-3
  8. Bartov E., Gul F. A. and Tsui J. S. (2000), Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), pp. 421-452, DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00015-5
  9. Barucci E. and Falini J. (2005), Determinants of corporate governance in the Italian financial market, Economic Notes, 34(3), pp. 371-405,
  10. Bebchuck L., Kraakman R. and Triantis G. (2000), Stock pyramids, cross-owner- ship, and dual class equity: the creation and agency costs of separating control from cash flow rights. (Chicago, IL: NBER/University of Chicago Press).
  11. Bebchuk L. A. and Hamdani A. (2017), Independent directors and controlling share- holders, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(6), pp. 1271-1315,
  12. Belcredi M. and Enriques L. (2014), Institutional investor activism in a context of concentrated ownership and high private benefits of control: the case of Italy, ECGI Law Working Paper, n. 225,
  13. Belcredi M., Bozzi S. and Di Noia C. (2013), Board elections and shareholders ac- tivism: the Italian experiment, in Belcredi M. and Ferrarini G. (Eds), Boards and shareholders in European listed companies. (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Uni- versity Press), DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139629126.008
  14. Belcredi M., Bozzi S., Ciavarella A. and Novembre V. (2014), Say-on-pay in a con- text of concentrated ownership. Evidence from Italy, Co.N.So.B. Working Paper, 76,
  15. Benkraiem R., Hamrouni A., Lakhal F. and Toumi N. (2017), Board independence, gender diversity and CEO compensation, Corporate Governance: the Interna- tional Journal of Business in Society, 17(5), pp. 845-860, DOI: 10.1108/CG-02-2017-0027
  16. Berkman H., Cole R. A. and Fu L. J. (2010), Political connections and minority- shareholder protection: evidence from securities-market regulation in China, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45(6), pp. 1391-1417, DOI: 10.1017/S0022109010000608
  17. Berle A. and Means G. (1932), The modern corporation and private property. (New York, NY: MacMillan).
  18. Bianchi M. and Bianco M. (2006), Italian corporate governance in the last 15 years: from pyramids to coalitions?, ECGI Finance Working Paper, 144,
  19. Bianchi M., Ciavarella A., Enriques L., Novembre V. and Signoretti R. (2014), Reg- ulation and self-regulation of related party transactions in Italy. An empirical analysis, ECGI Finance Working Paper, 415,
  20. Bianchi M., Ciavarella A., Novembre V. and Signoretti R. (2011), Comply or ex- plain investor protection through the Italian Corporate Governance Code, Jour- nal of Applied Corporate Finance, 23(1), pp. 107-121,
  21. Bianchi M., Enriques L. and Milic M. (2018), Enforcing rules on related party trans- actions in Italy: one securities regulator’s challenge, ECGI Law Working Paper, 409,
  22. Black B.S., Jang H. and Kim W. (2006), Does corporate governance predict firms’ market values? Evidence from Korea, The Journal of Law, Economics, and Or- ganization, 22(2), pp. 366-413,
  23. Bona‐Sánchez C., Pérez‐Alemán J. and Santana‐Martín D. J. (2014), Politically con- nected firms and earnings informativeness in the controlling versus minority shareholders context: European evidence, Corporate Governance: an Interna- tional Review, 22(4), pp. 330-346,
  24. Cappellieri F. (2020), The slate-vote system as a mechanism to mitigate the risk of self-dealing transactions via RPTs, Journal of Governance and Regulation, 9(3), pp. 122-131,
  25. Cappellieri F., Moscariello N. and, Pizzo M. (2019), Determinants of minority share- holders’ representativeness in the board of directors of Italian listed companies, in New challenges in corporate governance: Theory and PracticeChallenges and opportunities in Italian Corporate Governance, Virtus Interpress.
  26. Chen J. J., Cheng P. and Xiao X. (2011), Related party transactions as a source of earnings management, Applied Financial Economics, 21(3), pp. 165-181, DOI: 10.1080/09603107.2010.528361
  27. Chen S., Wang K. and Li X. (2012), Product market competition, ultimate control- ling structure and related party transactions, China Journal of Accounting Re- search, 5(4), pp. 293-306,
  28. Chen Y. M. and Chien C. Y. (2007), Monitoring mechanism, corporate governance and related party transactions, SSRN Working Paper Series,
  29. Cheng E.C.M. and Courtenay S.M. (2006), Board composition, regulatory regime and voluntary disclosure, The International Journal of Accounting, 41(3), pp. 262-289,
  30. Cheung Y. L., Jing L., Lu T., Rau P. R. and Stouraitis A. (2009), Tunneling and propping up: an analysis of related party transactions by Chinese listed compa- nies, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17(3), pp. 372-393,
  31. Cheung Y. L., Rau P. R. and Stouraitis A. (2006), Tunneling, propping, and expro- priation: evidence from connected party transactions in Hong Kong, Journal of Financial Economics, 82(2), pp. 343-386,
  32. Chien C. Y. and Hsu J. (2010), The role of corporate governance in related party transactions, SSRN Working Paper Series,
  33. Claessens S., Djankov S. and Lang L.H. (2000), The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations, Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), pp. 81-112, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00067-2
  34. Co.N.So.B. (2010), Regolamento Operazioni con Parti Correlate, Resolution n. 17221.
  35. Coase R.H. (1937a), The firm, the market and the law. (Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press).
  36. Coase R.H. (1937b), The nature of the firm. Readings in price theory. (Homewood, IL: Irwin).
  37. Coffee Jr J. C. (2005), A theory of corporate scandals: why the USA and Europe differ, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(2), pp. 198-211,
  38. D’Onza G., Greco G. and Ferramosca S. (2014), Corporate governance in Italian listed companies, in Idowu S. O. and Caliyurt K. T. (Eds), Corporate govern- ance: an international perspective. (Berlin, DE: Springer). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-45167-6_5
  39. Dahya J., Dimitrov O. and McConnell J.J. (2009), Does board independence matter in companies with a controlling shareholder?, Journal of Applied Corporate Fi- nance, 21(1), pp. 67-78,
  40. De Poli M. and De Gioia Carabellese P. (2017), The minority directors in the corpo- rate governance of EU listed institutions: a chimaera or a possibility?, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 24(1), pp. 43-62, DOI: 10.1177/1023263X17693187
  41. Dechow P.M., Sloan R.G. and Sweeney A. (1996), Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: an analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC, Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), pp. 1-36,
  42. Demsetz H. and Lehn K. (1985), The structure of corporate ownership: causes and consequences, Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), pp. 1155-1177, DOI: 10.1086/261354
  43. Di Carlo E. (2007), Governance e trasparenza del conflitto di interessi nei gruppi aziendali. (Rome, IT: Aracne).
  44. Di Carlo E. (2014), Related party transactions and separation between control and direction in business groups: the Italian case, Corporate Governance, 14(1), pp. 58-85. DOI: 10.1108/CG-02-2012-0005
  45. Doidge C., Karolyi G.A., Lins K.V., Miller D.P. and Stulz R.M. (2009), Private ben- efits of control, ownership, and the cross-listing decision, The Journal of Fi- nance, 64(1), pp. 425-466,
  46. Dyck A. and Zingales L. (2004), Private benefits of control: an international com- parison, The Journal of Finance, 59(2), pp. 537-600Dyck, A., Zingales, L. (2004), Private benefits of control: An international comparison, Journal of Fi- nance, 59(2), pp. 537-600,
  47. Ecker F., Francis J., Kim I., Olsson P. M. and Schipper K. (2006), A returns-based representation of earnings quality, The Accounting Review, 81(4), pp. 749-780,
  48. Emshwiller J. R. (2003), Business ties: many companies report transactions with top officers, Wall Street Journal, December 29: A1.
  49. Enriques L. (2009), Modernizing Italy’s corporate governance institutions: mission accomplished?, ECGI Law Working Paper, 123,
  50. Enriques L. (2012), Le regole della finanza. Diritto societario e mercato in Italia e in Europa. (IBL libri).
  51. Enriques L. (2014), Related party transactions: policy options and real-world chal- lenges (with a critique of the European Commission proposal), ECGI, Law Work- ing Paper, 267/2014,
  52. Enriques L. and Volpin P. (2007), Corporate governance in continental Europe, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), pp. 117-140,
  53. Fama E. F. (1980), Agency problems and the theory of the firm, Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), pp. 288-307, DOI: 10.1086/260866
  54. Fama E. F. and Jensen M. C. (1983), Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), pp. 301-25, DOI: 10.1086/467037
  55. Fan J. P. and Goyal V. K. (2006), On the patterns and wealth effects of vertical mergers, The Journal of Business, 79(2), pp. 877-902, DOI: 10.1086/499141
  56. Farrar J. H. and Watson S. (2011), Self-dealing, fair dealing and related party trans- actions: history, policy and reform. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 11(2), 495-523, DOI: 10.5235/147359711798110655
  57. Fera P. (2020), Le operazioni tra parti correlate: profili informativi e problematiche di corporate governance. (Turin, IT: G. Giappichelli Editore).
  58. Fera P., Moscariello N., Pizzo M. and Ricciardi G. (2021), Institutional investors’ representativeness and earnings management: evidence from a high ownership concentration context, in Vieira E., Madaleno M. and Azevedo G. (Eds.), Com- parative research on earnings management, corporate governance, and eco- nomic value. (Pennsylvania: IGI Global),
  59. Fera P., Moscariello N., Pizzo M. and Ricciardi G. (2022), The relationship between minority directors and earnings management: an empirical analysis in the Italian institutional setting, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, Forthcoming.
  60. Fisman R. and Khanna T. (2004), Facilitating development: the role of business groups, World Development, 32(4), pp. 609-628,
  61. Friedman E., Johnson S. and Mitton T. (2003), Propping and tunneling, Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4), pp. 732-750,
  62. García‐Sánchez I. M. and Martínez‐Ferrero J. (2017), Independent directors and CSR disclosures: the moderating effects of proprietary costs, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(1), pp. 28-43,
  63. Gelb D.S. (2000), Managerial ownership and accounting disclosures: an empirical study, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 15(2), pp. 169-185, DOI: 10.1023/A:1008321230900
  64. Gilson R. J. (2006), Controlling shareholders and corporate governance: complicat- ing the comparative taxonomy, Harvard Law Review, 119(6), pp. 1642-1679.
  65. Gopalan R. and Jayaraman S. (2012), Private control benefits and earnings manage- ment: evidence from insider controlled firms, Journal of Accounting Research, 50(1), pp. 117-157,
  66. Gordon E. A. and Henry E. (2005), Related party transactions and earnings manage- ment, SSRN Working Paper Series,
  67. Gordon E. A., Henry E. and Palia D. (2004b), Related party transactions associations with corporate governance and firm value, Rutgers University, working paper,
  68. Gordon E. A., Henry E., and Palia D. (2004), Related party transactions and corpo- rate governance, Advances in Financial Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 1-27. DOI: 10.1016/S1569-3732(04)09001-2
  69. Gordon E. A., Henry E., Louwers T. J. and Reed B. J. (2007), Auditing related party transactions: a literature overview and research synthesis, Accounting Horizons, 21(1), pp. 81-102,
  70. Gouldner A.W. (1960), The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement, American Sociological Review, 25(2), pp. 161-178, DOI: 10.2307/2092623
  71. Goyal V.K. and Park C.W. (2002), Board leadership structure and CEO turnover, Journal of Corporate Finance, 8(1), pp. 49-66, DOI: 10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00028-1
  72. Gutiérrez M. and Sáez M. (2013), Deconstructing independent directors, Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 13(1), pp. 63-94, DOI: 10.5235/14735970.13.1.63
  73. Ianniello G. (2015), The effects of board and auditor independence on earnings quality: evidence from Italy, Journal of Management and Governance, 19(1), pp. 229-253,
  74. International Accounting Standard Board (IASB), IAS 24 – Related Party Disclosures.
  75. Jensen M. C. (1993), The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems, The Journal of Finance, 48(3), pp. 831-880,
  76. Jensen M. C. and Meckling W. H. (1976), Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp. 305-360, DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  77. Jian M. and Wong T. J. (2010), Propping through related party transactions, Review of Accounting Studies, 15(1), pp. 70-105,
  78. Joh S. W. (2003), Corporate governance and firm profitability: evidence from Korea before the economic crisis, Journal of Financial Economics, 68(2), pp. 287-322, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00068-0
  79. John K. and Senbet L. W. (1998), Corporate governance and board effectiveness, Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(4), pp. 371-403, DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00005-3
  80. Johnson S., La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F. and Shleifer A. (2000), Tunneling, American Economic Review, 90(2), pp. 22-27,
  81. Kaymak T. and Bektas E. (2017), Corporate social responsibility and governance: information disclosure in multinational corporations, Corporate Social Respon- sibility and Environmental Management, 24(6), pp. 555-569,
  82. Khanna T. and Palepu K. (1997), Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerg- ing markets, Harvard Business Review, 75(4), pp. 41-51.
  83. Khanna T. and Palepu K. (2000), Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups, The Journal of Finance, 55(2), pp. 867-891, DOI: 10.1111/0022-1082.00229
  84. Kohlbeck M. and Mayhew B. W. (2010), Valuation of firms that disclose related party transactions, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(2), pp. 115-137,
  85. Kosnik R. D. (1987), Greenmail: a study of board performance in corporate governance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(2), pp. 163-185,
  86. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. and Vishny R. W. (1998), Law and finance, Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), pp. 1113-1155, DOI: 10.1086/250042
  87. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. and Vishny R. W. (2000), Investor protection and corporate governance, Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), pp. 3-27, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00065-9
  88. Lemmon M. L. and Lins K. V. (2003), Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: evidence from the East Asian financial crisis, The Journal of Finance, 58(4), pp. 1445-1468, DOI: 10.1111/1540-6261.00573
  89. Lipton M. and Lorsch J. W. (1992), A modest proposal for improved corporate gov- ernance, The Business Lawyer, 1, pp. 59-77, -- https://www.jstor.org/sta-ble/40687360.
  90. Maglio R., Rey A., Agliata F. and Lombardi R. (2020), Exploring sustainable gov- ernance: compliance with the Italian related party transactions regulation for the legal protection of minority shareholders, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), pp. 272-282,
  91. Malik M. S. and Makhdoom D. D. (2016), Does corporate governance beget firm performance in Fortune Global 500 companies?, Corporate Governance: the In- ternational Journal of Business in Society, 16(4), pp. 747-764, DOI: 10.1108/CG-12-2015-0156
  92. Mallin C., Melis A. and Gaia S. (2015), The remuneration of independent directors in the UK and Italy: an empirical analysis based on agency theory, International Business Review, 24(2), pp. 175-186,
  93. Marchetti P., Siciliano G. and Ventoruzzo M. (2017), Dissenting directors, ECGI Law Working Paper, n. 332,
  94. Marchini P.L., Mazza T. and, Medioli A. (2018), Related party transactions, corporate governance and earnings management, Corporate Governance: The Inter- national Journal of Business in Society, 18(6), pp. 1124-1146, DOI: 10.1108/CG-11-2017-0271
  95. Mather P. and Ramsay A. (2006), The effects of board characteristics on earnings management around Australian CEO changes, Accounting Research Journal, 19(2), pp. 78-93, DOI: 10.1108/10309610680000680
  96. Melis A. (2000), Corporate governance in Italy, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 8(4), pp. 347-355, DOI: 10.1111/1467-8683.00213
  97. Melis A. (2005), Corporate governance failures: to what extent is Parmalat a partic- ularly Italian cCase?, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(4), pp. 478-488,
  98. Melis A. (2006), Corporate governance and development in Italy, in Belcredi M. and Ferrarini G. (Eds), Handbook of international corporate governance: country analysis. (Edward Elgar).
  99. Melis A., Carta S. and Gaia S. (2012), Executive remuneration in block holder-dom- inated firms. How do Italian firms use stock options?, Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), pp. 511-541,
  100. Mengoli S., Pazzaglia F. and Sapienza E. (2009), Effect of governance reforms on corporate ownership in Italy: is it still pizza, spaghetti, and mandolino?, Corpo- rate Governance: an International Review, 17(5), pp. 629-645,
  101. Michelon G. and Parbonetti A. (2012), The effect of corporate governance on sus- tainability disclosure, Journal of Management and Governance, 16(3), pp. 477- 509,
  102. Morck R. (2008), Behavioral finance in corporate governance: economics and ethics of the devil’s advocate, Journal of Management & Governance, 12(2), pp. 179- 200,
  103. Moscariello N. (2007), Le operazioni tra ‘‘parti correlate’’ nella comunicazione d’azienda. (Padova, IT: Cedam).
  104. Moscariello N. (2012), Related party transactions in continental European countries: evidence from Italy, International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 9(2), pp. 126-147,
  105. Moscariello N., Pizzo M., Govorun D. and Kostyuk A. (2018), Independent minority directors and firm value in a principal-principal agency setting: evidence from Italy, Journal of Management and Governance, 23(1), pp. 165-194,
  106. Nekhili M. and Cherif M. (2011), Related parties transactions and firm’s market value: the French case, Review of Accounting and Finance, 10(3), pp. 291-315, DOI: 10.1108/14757701111155806
  107. Nenova T. (2003), The value of corporate voting rights and control: a cross-country analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 68(3), pp. 325-351, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00069-2
  108. Nguyen B. D. and Nielsen K. M. (2010), The value of independent directors: evi- dence from sudden deaths, Journal of Financial Economics, 98(3), pp. 550-567,
  109. Osma B.G. and Noguer B.G.D.A. (2007), The effect of the board composition and its monitoring committees on earnings management: evidence from Spain, Cor- porate Governance: An International Review, 15(6), pp. 1413-1428,
  110. Pacces, A. (2012), Rethinking corporate governance: the law and economics of control powers (1st ed.). (Routledge).
  111. Park Y. W. and Shin H. H. (2004), Board composition and earnings management in Canada, Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(3), pp. 431-457, DOI: 10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00025-7
  112. Peng W. Q., Wei K. J. and Yang Z. (2011), Tunneling or propping: evidence from connected transactions in China, Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(2), pp. 306- 325,
  113. Pizzo M. (2009), Related party transactions in corporate governance, SSRN Working Paper Series.
  114. Pizzo M. (2013), Related party transactions under a contingency perspective, Journal of Management and Governance, 17(2), pp. 309-330,
  115. Pizzo M., Moscariello N. and Vinciguerra R. (2010), Ruling self-dealing in a global market: a reassessment of the convergence vs path-dependency debate, Corporate Ownership and Control, 7(4), pp. 380-392,
  116. Prencipe A. and Bar-Yosef S. (2011), Corporate governance and earnings manage- ment in family-controlled companies, Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 26(2), pp. 199-227, DOI: 10.1177/0148558X11401212
  117. Qian M., Pan H. and Yeung B. (2011), Expropriation of minority interest sharehold- ers in politically connected firms, NUS Business School, working paper,
  118. Riyanto Y. E. and Toolsema L. A. (2008), Tunneling and propping: a justification for pyramidal ownership, Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(10), pp. 2178- 2187,
  119. Roy S. K., Roy M. and Kar S. (2020), Do related party transactions affect the opu- lence of a corporate firm? Recent evidences from Indian data, in Satapathy S., Bhateja V., Mohanty J. and Udgata S. (Eds), Smart intelligent computing and applications. (Singapore: Springer), DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-9282-5_29
  120. Ryngaert M. and Thomas S. (2012), Not all related party transactions (RPTs) are the same: ex ante versus ex post RPTs, Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), pp. 845-882,
  121. Shin H. H. and Park Y. S. (1999), Financing constraints and internal capital markets: evidence from Korean chaebols, Journal of Corporate Finance, 5(2), pp. 169- 191, DOI: 10.1016/S0929-1199(99)00002-4
  122. Shleifer A. and Vishny R. (1997), A survey of corporate governance, The Journal of Finance, 52(2), pp. 737-783,
  123. Stein J. C. (1997), Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources, The Journal of Finance, 52(1), pp. 111-133,
  124. Thomsen S. (2005), Corporate governance as a determinant of corporate values, Corporate Governance: the International Journal of Business In Society, 5(4), pp. 10-27, DOI: 10.1108/14720700510616569
  125. Toniolo A. (2021), Regulating related party transactions during the CcOVID-19 crisis, Christ University Law Journal, 10(1), pp. 1-31,
  126. Utama C.A. and Utama S. (2014), Corporate governance, size and disclosure of related party transactions, and firm value: Indonesia evidence, International Jour- nal of Disclosure and Governance, 11(4), pp. 341-365,
  127. Volpin P. (2002), Governance with poor investor protection: evidence from top executive turnover in Italy, Journal of Financial Economics, 64(1), pp. 61-90, DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00071-5
  128. Weisbach M. (1988), Outside directors and CEO turnover, Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1-2), pp. 413-60, DOI: 10.1016/0304-405X(88)90053-0
  129. Williamson O. (1985), The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, re- lational contracting. (New York, NY: Free Press).
  130. Yeh Y. H., Shu P. G. and Su Y. H. (2012), Related-party transactions and corporate governance: the evidence from the Taiwan stock market, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 20(5), pp. 755-776,
  131. Ying Q. and Wang L. (2013), Propping by controlling shareholders, wealth transfer and firm performance: evidence from Chinese listed companies, China Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), pp. 133-147,
  132. Zhou F., Fan Y., An Y. and Zhong L. (2017), Independent directors, non-controlling directors, and executive pay-for-performance sensitivity: evidence from Chinese non-state owned enterprises, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 43, pp. 55-71,

  • Minority directors: A review of determinants and consequences and suggestions for future research Pietro Fera, Gianmarco Salzillo, Caterina Cantone, in Corporate Board role duties and composition /2022 pp.8
    DOI: 10.22495/cbv18i3art1

Pietro Fera, Rosa Vinciguerra, Minorities’ Representativeness on the Board and their Effect on the Level of Compliance with the Italian RPTs Regulation in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 2/2022, pp 57-88, DOI: 10.3280/FR2022-002003