The current state of tort law in Ukraine and its development in the context of European integration

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Autori/Curatori Anatoliy Kostruba
Anno di pubblicazione 2024 Fascicolo 2023/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 17 P. 47-63 Dimensione file 154 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2023-002004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

In today’s market economy and evolving society, it is essential to update legal mechanisms to protect the rights of participants in civil transactions. Tort law plays a vital role in regulating compensation for damage caused by rights violations. It is aimed at assisting victims, establishing liability, and preventing harmful acts, usually resulting in monetary compensation as a form of redress. This article aims to study the current state of tort law in Ukraine, identify problematic aspects in this area, and determine the prospects for its development and improvement in the context of European integration. To achieve the goals and objectives of the study, the author uses a combination of general theoretical and unique scientific methods and techniques of scientific knowledge. The methodological basis of the study is the dialectical method.

Keywords:non-contractual obligations, private international law, tort, tort law, compensation for damages, civil law.

  1. Chamberlain J. (2023). The risk-based approach of the European Union’s proposed artificial intelligence regulation: Some comments from a tort law perspective. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 14(1), 1-13.
  2. De Bruyne J. (2019). Tort Law and the Regulation of Classification Societies: Between Public and Private Roles in the Maritime Industry. European Review of Private Law, 27(2), 22-30.
  3. Donahue N. & Witt J. F. (2019). Tort as Private Administration. Cornell Law Review, 105, 1093 p.
  4. Frantzuz-Yakovets T. A., & Gavrylenko O. O. (2023). The legal nature of the institution of tortious liability of public entities. Current Studies of Legal and Historical Science Materials, 48(37).
  5. Gilboa M. (2019). Multiple reasonable behaviors cases: The problem of causal under determination in tort law. Legal Theory, 25(2), 77-104.
  6. Hacker P., Krestel R., Grundmann S., & Naumann F. (2020). Explainable AI under contract and tort law: legal incentives and technical challenges. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28, 415-439.
  7. Hinteregger M. (2022). Climate change and tort law. In: Climate Change, Responsibility and Liability (383-414). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG. Infantino M. (2023). Protected Interests under the Principles of European Tort Law. Journal of European Tort Law, 14(1), 42-60.
  8. Karnauch B. (2021). Tort liability of public authorities under the Civil Code of Ukraine. Civil Law and Process, 19, 1-10.
  9. Karnaukh B. (2019). Causation as a condition of tort liability in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights: cases of violation of procedural guarantees. Problems of Legality, (145), 68-79.
  10. Karnaukh B. (2020). Duplication of damages in tort law. Problems of Legality, (151), 31-41.
  11. Khoina D. S. (2023). Legal characteristics of non-contractual obligations in the system of civil law. In O. S. Bondar (Scientific manager), Reforming the legal system in the context of European integration processes: materials of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 137-140). Sumy, Ukraine: Sumy State University.
  12. Bambauer J. & Roth A. (2021). From Damage Caps to Decarceration: Extending Tort Law Safeguards to Criminal Sentencing. BUL Review, 101, 1667.
  13. Loth M. (2021). How does Tort Law deal with historical injustice? On slavery reparations, post-colonial redress, and the legitimations of Tort Law. Journal of European Tort Law, 11(3), 181-207.
  14. Matvieieva L., Dorofeieva L., Burdin M., Durnov Y., & Dei M. (2022). Legal process in the national legal doctrine of Ukraine through the scope of the case law of the European court of human rights. International Journal for Court Administration, 13(2), 1-12.
  15. Mykolenko O. M. (2019). Punitive function of administrative-delict law. Rule of Law, 33, 71-77.
  16. Omelchuk O. M., Haiur I. Y., Kozytska O. G., Prysiazhna A. V., & Khmelevska N. V. (2022). Analysis of the activities of law enforcement authorities in the field of combating crime and corruption offences. Journal of Money Launde ring Control, 25(3), 700-716.
  17. Otradnova O. O. (2021). Development of the school of tort law. Bulletin of the Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, 3, 10-15.
  18. Sambor M. A. (2022). Failure to comply with the procedural form of administrativedelict proceedings and violation of guarantees of human rights and freedoms: ways to eliminate violations and gaps in legislation. Bulletin of the Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E.O. Didorenko, 4(100), 186-206.
  19. Scordato M. R. (2022). Three Kinds of Fault: Understanding the Purpose and Function of Causation in Tort Law. University of Miami Law Review, 77, 149 p.
  20. Sokol K. C. (2020). Seeking (Some) Climate Justice in State Tort Law. Washington Law Review, 95, 1383 p.
  21. Steel S. (2021). On the moral necessity of tort law: the fairness argument. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 41(1), 192-218.
  22. Uvarenko V. A. (2023). Correlative characteristic of tort liability and liability insurance liability for damage. In: Problems of civil law and process (491-494). Vinnytsia: KhNUVS.
  23. Van Dam C. (2013). European Tort Law (Second Edition). Oxford University Press. Kadner Graziano T. (2023). The Purposes of Tort Law: Article 10: 101 of the Principles of European Tort Law Reconsidered. Journal of European Tort Law, 14(1), 23-41.
  24. Velikanova M. M. (2019). Allocation of risk in tort obligations. Law and Society, 1, 40-44.
  25. Velikanova M. M. (2020). Distribution of the risk of causing damage in tortious obligations from the point of view of economic analysis of law. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 27(2), 1-8.
  26. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (1951). The Civil Code of Ukraine. -Retrieved from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15#Text.
  27. Wagner G. (2021). Tort law and human rights. Transnational Legal Activism in Global Value Chains. The Ali Enterprises Factory Fire and the Struggle for Justice, 1, 209-233.
  28. Yanovitska G. (2023). Subjects of tortious obligations. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University. Series: Law, 1(75), 222-227.

Anatoliy Kostruba, The current state of tort law in Ukraine and its development in the context of European integration in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 2/2023, pp 47-63, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2023-002004