Exploring Peace Dynamics through Conscious Interactions: An Innovative Methodological Proposal in Action Research

Journal title WELFARE E ERGONOMIA
Author/s Erica Rizziato
Publishing Year 2026 Issue 2026/1 Suppl.
Language Italian Pages 17 P. 155-171 File size 76 KB
DOI 10.3280/WE2026-001-S1009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The article takes up, and expands on, part of the work presented by IRCrES at the DSU peace conference in December 2024. It deals in particular with an innovative methodology, in the context of action research, as an approach to developing social interactions in a progressively conscious manner, a key element in overcoming conflicts. The proposed methodology (Metodology for horizontal leadership and integrated organizations) focuses on non-conflictual dynamics and social well–being in the context of organisational and local development and can be extended to broader social contexts. It was developed in a CNR project, with a wide stakeholder participation, to respond to critical issues that emerged in the international action research community. It is based on a multi and transdisciplinary approach and Morin's complex systemic view of social systems. In the context of action research and the proposed methodology, peace dynamics are considered to be a consequence of respect for individuals’ social identity, in the perception of being co-creators of the contexts in which they themselves define their evolving identity. Where, even in a situation of peace at the macro-systems level, these dynamics do not move in the right direction in the micro-systems, tensions and malaise are created at various levels, resulting in growing social unease, inevitably leading to conflictual situations that spread. In this sense, the methodology aims to contribute to the creation of what is defined as “positive peace”. The challenge, which the methodology takes up, is to initiate systemic cultural growth in which people’s social individualities become generators of an ecological awareness of self, contexts and self as co-creators of contexts. The methodology has been tested in various profit, non-profit and public contexts, in local development, in youth employment and for university teaching innovation. To extend and enhance its application, in 2024, the writer set up a spin-off company of the CNR, named International Institute for Human and Organizational Development (IMO).

Keywords: peace dynamics; action research; personal and social identity; transdisciplinarity; transformative learning; generative dialogue; new horizontal leadership competencies; systemic-evolutionary development.

  1. Novara F. (2010). Le ragioni del progetto. In: Rizziato E. (2010). Etica dello sviluppo organizzativo e senso del lavoro: verso un approccio europeo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  2. Novara F. (2004). Si può guarire l’organizzazione? Itinerari d’impresa: management diritto formazione. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
  3. Galtung J. (2008). Affrontare il conflitto, trascendere e trasformare Pisa: ed. Plus (Pisa university press).
  4. Galtung J. (1995). Storia dell'idea di pace. Torino: Pangea.
  5. Gustavsen B. (2001). Teoria e pratica: la mediazione discorso. In: P. Reason e H. Bradbury, a cura di, Libro della ricerca-azione: Indagine e pratica partecipativa. Londra: Sage, pp. 17-26.
  6. Hosking D.M. and Morley, I.E. (1991). A Social Psicology of Organizing. Harlow: Prentice Hall.
  7. Kelly G. (2004). La psicologia dei costrutti personali. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  8. Siegel D.J. (2010). Mindsight. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  9. Siegel D.J. (2001). La mente relazionale. Neurobiologia dell’esperienza interpersonale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  10. Tomasello M. (2005). Le origini culturali della cognizione umana. Bologna: il Mulino.
  11. Weick K. e Sutcliffe K. (2007). Governare l’inatteso. Organizzazioni capaci di affrontare le crisi con successo. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  12. Parsons T. (1991). The Social System. London: Routledge.
  13. Pettigrew A.M. (1988). The Management of Strategic Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
  14. Poli E. (2014). Anatomia della guarigione. Milano: Anima Edizioni.
  15. Reason P. and Braddbury H. (2001, 2008, 2015). Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  16. Rizziato E: (2024). Toward a humanism in organizations. Horizontal leadership and cousciousness. Roma: CNR Edizioni.
  17. Rizziato E. (2022). Lo sviluppo locale: un approccio sistemico e generativo con la leadership orizzontale. Quaderni IRCrES 15. Moncalieri: CNR-IRCrES,
  18. Rizziato E. (2020). Verso un umanesimo della vita organizzativa: generare sviluppo nella complessità con la leadership orizzontale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  19. Rizziato E. (2018). Organizzazioni e leadership orizzontali: il percorso di training sistemico-evolutivo (TRASE), 12, IRCrES Working Paper: Torino.
  20. Rizziato E. (2017). Horizontal organization and leadership: a generative approach for an ethic Development in complex systems. Book of proceedings conferenza internazionale Euromed, Roma. -- http://www.emrbi.org/bop2017.pdf.
  21. Lewin K. (1948). Resolving Social Conflict: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics. Harper: New York.
  22. Lewin K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2: 34-46.
  23. Lievegoed B.C.J. (1979). Phases, Crisis and Development in the Individual. London: Rudolf Steiner Press.
  24. Lievegoed B.C.J. (1973). Developing Organisation. London: Tavistock.
  25. Luhmann T. (2001). Sistemi sociali. Fondamenti di una teoria generale. Bologna: il Mulino.
  26. Maslow A. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper Row.
  27. Maturana H. e Varela F. (2001). Autopoiesi e cognizione. Venezia: Marsilio.
  28. Mezirow J. (2003). Apprendimento e trasformazione. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  29. Morin H. (2018). Prefazione. In: Ceruti M. Il tempo della complessità. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  30. Morin H. (2017). Le sfide della complessità. Firenze: Le lettere.
  31. Morin H. (2014). Insegnare a vivere. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  32. Morin H. (2002). Il metodo 5: L’identità umana. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  33. Mounier E. (1955). Rivoluzione personalista e comunitaria. Milano: Edizioni di Comunità.
  34. French W.L. and Bell C.H. (1998). Organisation Development: Behavioral Science.Intervention for Organisational Improvement. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliff.
  35. Rizziato E. (2014). La ricerca-azione: un approccio per comprendere ed interagire con i processi delle dinamiche socio-economiche, 26, CNR-Ceris Working Paper: Torino. -- http://www.ceris.cnr.it/ceris/workingpaper/2014/WP_26_RIZZIATO.pdf.
  36. Rizziato E. (2010). Etica dello sviluppo organizzativo e senso del lavoro. Verso la definizione di un approccio europeo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  37. Rizzolatti G. e Sinigaglia C. (2006). So quel che fai. Il cervello che agisce e i neuroni specchio. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  38. Senge P. (1990). The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.
  39. Damasio A. (1995). L’errore di Cartesio. Emozione, ragione e cervello umano. Milano: Adelphi.
  40. Depolo M. (2007). Psicologia delle organizzazioni. Bologna: il Mulino.
  41. Doidge N. (2007). The brain who change itself. New York: Penguin book.
  42. Eccles J. (1994). Come l’io controlla il suo cervello. Milano: Rizzoli.
  43. Eccles J. e Popper K. (1981). L’io e il suo cervello. Roma: Armando.
  44. Faggin F. (2022). Irriducibile: la coscienza, la vita, i computer e la nostra natura. Milano: Mondadori.
  45. Fisher S., Ibrahim A., Ludin J., Smith R. and Williams Steve and Williams Sue. (2000). Working with conflict: skills and strategies for action. London: Zed books.
  46. Foerster, von H. (1991). Through the Eyes of the Other. In: F. Steier, editor. Researchand Reflectivity. London: Sage.
  47. Assaggioli R. (1977). L’atto di volontà. Roma: Astrolabio.
  48. Bateson G. (1993). Verso un’Ecologia della Mente. Milano: Adelphi.
  49. Bateson G. (1984). Mente e natura. Un’unità necessaria. Milano: Adelphi.
  50. Bekman A. (2010). The horizontal leadership book. Berlin: Alertverlag.
  51. Bekman A. (2007). The methodology of evidential. In: J.J. Boonstra and L. Caluwè (2007), Intervening and Changing: Looking for Meaning in Interactions. New York: Wiley, pp. 29-45.
  52. Beer M., Eisenstat R.A. and Spector B. (1990). The Critical Path to Corporate Renewal. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  53. Bertalanffy, von L. (1968). General system theory. Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziler.
  54. Boonstra J. and Caluwè L. (2007). Intervening and Changing: Looking for Meaning in Interactions. New York: Wiley.
  55. Cambell D., Elgin D., Harman W., Hastings A., Markley O., Matson F, O’Regan B. and Schneid L. (1982). Changing image of the man. Stanford Research Institute, Markley: Pergamon Press.
  56. Ceruti M. (2017). Il tempo della complessità. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.

Erica Rizziato, Le dinamiche della pace, verso interazioni consapevoli: la proposta di una metodologia innovativa nel contesto della ricerca-azione in "WELFARE E ERGONOMIA" 1 Suppl./2026, pp 155-171, DOI: 10.3280/WE2026-001-S1009