Management Control Systems for exploration? A paradox and a challenge for research

Author/s Paolo Collini, Maria Laura Frigotto
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/1 Language Italian
Pages 18 P. 27-44 File size 665 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2013-001003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In this article the Authors review the relationship between strategy and management control (MCS) by confronting the two most largely accepted lines of thinking in the literature - the so-called "contingency" and "alternative". Authors identify conceptual and methodological limitations of both approaches, analysing critiques coming from both sides and identifying complementarities within epistemological differences. In the light of the radical changes in the business environment that firms have faced in the last two decades, the ability to change both in the exploitation and exploration directions is considered to be crucial. For the purpose of adaptation, we argue that strategy and MCS interact in a two-way relation rather than being linked by a hierarchy, and their evolution over time can therefore be seen as a co-evolution. This approach shifts attention to dynamism and poses at least two main challenges to scholars addressing the MCSstrategy relationship. Firstly, at the methodological level, non-positivistic approaches may offer a prominent contribution to understanding change, nevertheless they are taken with an amount of suspicion by the mainstream academic community; this problem must be faced by promoting reciprocal comprehension and by supporting dialogue in dedicated editorial indicatives. Secondly, at the conceptual level, MCS is designed to support the implementation of strategic exogenous targets. However, if we consider strategy formulation and strategy implementation as part of a single process of mutual creation, scholars are asked to deploy the paradox of systems designed to control goals that are dynamic, unstable and imprecise in nature. This requires to rethink the form and components of MCS, and their desired degree of specification.

Keywords: Strategy, Management Control, Contingency Theory, Alternative Control Theory

  1. Ahrens T., Chapman C.S. (2005), Management Control Systems and the crafting of strategy: a practice based view, in Chapman C.S. (a cura di), Controlling strategy: Management, accounting and performance measurement. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  2. Ahrens T., Chapman C.S. (2007), Management accounting as practice, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, pp. 1-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.013
  3. Ansoff H.I. (1965), Corporate Strategy, Mc-Graw Hill.
  4. Anthony R.N. (1965), Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Harvard Business School Division of Research.
  5. Archer S., & Otley D. (1991). Strategy, structure, planning and control systems and performance evaluation – Rumenco Ltd. Management Accounting Research, 2, pp. 263-303. DOI: 10.1016/S1044-5005(91)70038-3
  6. Becker, M.C. Knudsen, T. & March, J.G. (2006). Schumpeter, Winter, and the sources of novelty, Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 2, pp. 353-371. DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtl003
  7. Bergamin M. (1992), Il controllo di gestione in un’ottica strategica, UTET, Torino
  8. Bergamin M., Collini P. (1993), Gli sviluppi negli studi di management accounting, Sistema Impresa, 8, marzo-aprile, pp. 12-24.
  9. Boynlon A.C., and Zmud R.W. (1984), An Assessment of Critical Success Factors. Sloan Management Review (25:4), pp. 17-27.
  10. Brunetti G. (1979), Il controllo di gestione in condizioni ambientali perturbale, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  11. Chapman C.S. (2005), The relationship between management control systems and strategy, in Chapman C. S. (a cura di), Controlling Strategy: Management Accounting and Performance Measurement, Oxford University Press.
  12. Chenhall R.H. (2003), Management control system design within its organizational context: findings from contingency based research and directions for the future, Accounting Organizations and Society, 28, pp. 127-168. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7
  13. Chua, W. F. (2007). Accounting, measuring, reporting and strategizing – re-using verbs: a review essay, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, pp. 487-494. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.010
  14. Cinquini L., Tenucci A. (2010). Strategic management accounting and business strategy: a loose coupling? Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 6, 2, pp. 228:259. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.03.010
  15. Cooper R. (1988), The rise of activity-based costing-Part one: What is an activity-based cost system?, Journal of Cost Management, Summer, pp. 45-54.
  16. Cyert R.M., March J.C. (1992), A behavioral theory of the firm, 2nd ed. Blackwell Publisher Inc. Malden, MA
  17. Dent J. (1990), Strategy, organization and control: Some possibilities for accounting research, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15, 1-2, pp. 3-25.
  18. Donaldson L. (1966), The normal science of structural contingency theory, in Clegg S.R., Hardy C., Nord W.R. (a cura di), Handbook of Organizational Studies, SAGE
  19. Dosi G. (1982), Technological paradigms and technological trajectories, Research Policy, 11(3), pp. 147-162. DOI: 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6
  20. Frigotto ML., Coller G., and Collini P. (2011), The Strategy and Management Control Systems relationship as emerging dynamic process. Journal of Management & Governance, pp. 1-26.
  21. Garud R. and Ruppa M. (1994), A socio-cognitive model of technology evolution: the case of cochlear implants, Organization Science, 5(3), pp. 344-362. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.5.3.344
  22. Gavetti G., and Levinthal D. (2000), Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search, Administrative science quarterly, 45, 1, pp. 113-137. DOI: 10.2307/2666981
  23. Hedberg B. (1981), How Organizations Learn and Unlearn. In Starbuck, W.H. and Nystrom, P.C. (eds) Handbook of Organizational Design, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, pp. 3-27.
  24. Hopwood, A. G. (1987), The archaeology of accounting systems, Accounting Organizations and Society, 12, pp. 207-234. DOI: 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90038-9
  25. Johnson H.T., Kaplan R.S. (1987), Relevance lost: the rise and fall of management accounting, Harvard Business School Press, Boston Massachusetts
  26. Jørgensen, B., Messner, M. (2010), Accounting and strategising: a case study from new product development, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, pp. 184-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.001
  27. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard, Harvard Business Press, Boston Mass
  28. Katila R., Ahuja G. (2002), Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction, Academy of Management Journal, 45, pp. 1183- 1194. DOI: 10.2307/3069433
  29. Langfield-Smith K. (2006), Understanding management control systems and strategy, in Bhimani A. (a cura di), Contemporary issues in Management Accounting, Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283361.003.0011
  30. Langfield-Smith K. (2007), A review of quantitative research in management control system and strategy, in Chapman C.S., Hopwood A.G., Shields M.D. (a cura di), Handbook of Management Accounting Research, Elsevier, pp. 753-783
  31. Langfield-Smith K. (1997), Management control systems and strategy: a critical review, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(2), pp. 207-232. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(95)00040-2
  32. Langfield-Smith K. (2007), A review of quantitative research in management control system and strategy, in Chapman C. S., Hopwood A. G., and Shields M. D., (Eds.), Handbook of Management Accounting Research (pp 753-783). Elsevier
  33. Levinthal D.A., March J.G. (1993), The myopia of learning, Strategic Management Journal, 14 (special issue), pp. 95-112. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250141009
  34. Malmi T., Brown D.A. (2008), Management control systems as package - opportunities, challenges and research directions, Management Accounting Research, 19, 4, pp. 287- 300. DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003
  35. Malmi, T., and Brown, D. A. (2008), Management control systems as package - opportunities, challenges and research directions, Management Accounting Research, 19 (4), pp. 287-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003
  36. March J. Simon H. (1957), Organizations, Wiley, New York, NY (USA).
  37. March J.C., Simon H.A. (1958), Organizations, Whiley, NY
  38. March J.G. (1991), Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2, 1, pp. 71-87.
  39. March J. G. (2006), Rationality, Foolishness, and Adaptive Intelligence. Strategic Management Journal, 27, pp. 201-214. DOI: 10.1002/smj.515
  40. Mintzberg H. (1978), Patterns in Strategy formulation, Management Science, 24, 9, pp. 934- 48. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934
  41. Mintzberg H. (1990), The Design School: Reconsidering the Basic Premises of Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 11, 3, pp. 171-195. DOI: 10.1002/smj.4250110302
  42. Modell S. (2010). Bridging the paradigm divide in management accounting research: the role of mixed methods approaches. Management Accounting Research, 21, pp. 124-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2010.02.005
  43. Nanni J., Miller J.G., Vollmann T.E. (1988), What Shall We Account for?, Management Accounting, 69, pp. 42-48
  44. Nelson R., Winter S. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of the Firm, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Ma. (USA); Teece DJ, Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp. 509-533.
  45. Nørreklit H. (2003), The balanced Scorecard: what is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the Balanced Scorecard, Accounting Organization and Society, 28, pp. 591-619. DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00097-1
  46. Ocasio W. (1997), Towards an attention-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 18, Summer (special issue), pp. 187-206
  47. Paolini A. (1993), Il controllo strategico. Uno schema d'analisi; Giuffré editore, Milano
  48. Quattrone P. and Busco C. (2010), How management practices diffuse: The balanced scorecard as a rhetorical machine, paper presented at the EIASM conference “New Direction in Management Accounting”, Bruxelles, December 15-17.
  49. Schatzki T.R. (2002), The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  50. Schatzki T.R. (2005), The sites of organizations, Organization Studies, 26, 3, pp. 465-484. DOI: 10.1177/0170840605050876
  51. Shank J.K, Govindarajan V.G. (1992), Strategic Cost Management: Tailoring Controls to Strategies, Journal of Cost Management, 6, 3, Fall, pp. 14-25.
  52. Simon H.A. (1955), A behavioral model of rational choice, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 1, February, pp. 99-118. DOI: 10.2307/1884852
  53. Simons R. (1995), Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  54. Simons R. (1990), The role of management control system in creating competitive advantage: new perspectives, Accounting Organizations and Society, vol. 15, No. ½, pp. 127-143.
  55. Slagmulder R., (1997). Using management control systems to achieve alignment between strategic investment decisions and strategy, Management Accounting Research, 8, pp. 103-139. DOI: 10.1006/mare.1996.0035
  56. Thompson J. D. (1967), Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory. Transaction Pub
  57. Tripsas M. and Gavetti G. (2000), Capabilities, Cognition, and Inertia: Evidence from Digital Imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 10/11, pp. 1147-1161. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1147::AID-SMJ128>3.0.CO;2-R
  58. Weick K. E. (1195), Sensemaking in organizations. Vol. 3. Sage Publications, Incorporated.
  59. Womack J.P., Jones D.T., Roos D. (1990), The Machine that changed the World, The Free Press, New York, NY.

  • A field study of Value-Based Management sophistication: The role of shareholders Andrea Dello Sbarba, Riccardo Giannetti, Alessandro Marelli, in MANAGEMENT CONTROL 2/2015 pp.65
    DOI: 10.3280/MACO2015-002004
  • Inter-firm coordination as an Information problem. The case of a divisionalized company Antonio Leotta, in MANAGEMENT CONTROL 2/2016 pp.167
    DOI: 10.3280/MACO2016-002008
  • Accrual accounting and performance measurement: Empirical evidences from two Italian municipalities Eleonora Cardillo, Carmela Rizza, in MANAGEMENT CONTROL 2/2015 pp.135
    DOI: 10.3280/MACO2015-002006

Paolo Collini, Maria Laura Frigotto, Management Control Systems for exploration? A paradox and a challenge for research in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 1/2013, pp 27-44, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2013-001003