Journal title PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE
Author/s Mauro Fornaro
Publishing Year 2023 Issue 2023/3 Language Italian
Pages 10 P. 413-422 File size 51 KB
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
While aiming with Civitarese (2023) at a notion of intersubjectivity capable of justify- ing an idea of the psychoanalytic field based on the “being-with” analysand/analyst, the inadequacy for the purpose of Husserl’s philosophy is shown, ultimately for a notion of subject (tran- scendental ego) that is alien to psychoanalysis. On the other hand, the difference between the approach of Husserl and other authors who deal fruitfully with intersubjectivity should not be underestimated. Furthermore, the difficulties of the transition from philosophical speculation to clinical research, conducted from a field perspective, are underlined, and therefore attention is paid to the specific trans-individual phenomena, empirically detectable in the analytic setting.
Keywords: Psychoanalytic field; Husserl; Intersubjectivity; Transcendental ego; Subject
Mauro Fornaro, Perché Husserl non quadra col campo psicoanalitico e altre annotazioni. Replica a Giuseppe Civitarese in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 3/2023, pp 413-422, DOI: 10.3280/PU2023-003004