Transborder planning: examples from Latin America

Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Clara Irazàbal
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/69
Language Italian Pages 11 P. 7-17 File size 365 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2014-069001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Le discipline spaziali sono chiamate ad interrogarsi con maggiore attenzione sul ruolo che le dinamiche transnazionali hanno nella configurazione del paesaggio contemporaneo, nelle sue forme urbane, sociali ed identitarie. Lo studio di processi transnazionali nel contesto latino-americano, all’interno e al di là delle sue frontiere politiche, sociali, culturali e simboliche, mostra come le popolazioni migranti trascendano, negozino e ridisegnino i confini dei regimi di potere esistenti, attraverso le proprie pratiche abitative e di mobilità a diverse scale. Transbordering Latin Americas, ultimo progetto del Latin Lab della Columbia University, presenta una serie di ricerche che ragionano sulla diffusione globale d’immaginari, modi d’abitare e luoghi latino-americani che riflettono e, al contempo, contestano le dinamiche transnazionali del capitalismo globale

Keywords: Processi urbani transnazionali: transbordering planning; pratiche migranti

  1. Appadurai A., 1996, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.
  2. Bada X., 2010, «Mexican Migrants: The Attractions and Realities of the United States», Latin American Research Review, vol. 45, n. 2, pp. 236-244, DOI: 10.1353/lar.2010.0004
  3. Bauder H., 2013, «Nation, ‘Migration’ and Critical Practice», Area, vol. 45, n. 1, pp. 56-62, DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01129.x
  4. Cartier C. and Lew A.A., 2005, eds., Seductions of Place: Geographical Perspectives on Globalization and Touristed Landscapes, Routledge, Oxford, UK.
  5. Castells M., 2004, «An Introduction to the Information Age», in Webster F. et al. (eds.), The Information Society Reader, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 138-149.
  6. Cervera R., 2014, «The Archiculture of Immigration in the Borough of Tetuán (Madrid): A Pedagogical Approach», in Irazábal C. (ed.), Transbordering Latin Americas: Liminal Places, Cultures, and Powers (T)Here, Taylor & Francis Group, Routledge, New York, London, pp. 278-301.
  7. Chion M., 2014, «Cusco: City of Memory», in Irazábal C. (ed.), Transbordering Latin Americas: Liminal Places, Cultures, and Powers (T)Here, Taylor & Francis Group, Routledge, New York, London, pp. 79-95.
  8. Crang P., Dwyer C. and Jackson P., 2003, «Transnationalism and the Spaces of Commodity Culture», Progress in Human Geography, vol. 27, pp. 438-456, DOI: 10.1191/0309132503ph443oa
  9. Duany J., 2011. Blurred Borders: Transnational Migration Between the Hispanic Caribbean and the United States, The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC.
  10. Escobar A., 2006, «Revisioning Latin American and Caribbean Studies: A Geopolitics of Knowledge Approach», Latin American Studies Association Forum, vol. 2, pp. 11-13.
  11. Featherstone M., 1990, «Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalization
  12. and Modernity», Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 7, pp. 1-14,
  13. 10.1177/026327690007002001.
  14. Glick Schiller N. and Fouron G.E., 1999, «Terrains of Blood and Nation: Haitian Transnational Social Fields», Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 22, n. 2, pp. 340-366, DOI: 10.1080/014198799329512
  15. Glick Schiller N., Basch L. Blanc-Szanton C., 1992, «Transnationalism: A New Analytic Framework for Understanding Migration», in Id. (eds.), Towards a Transnational Perspective on Migration: Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Nationalism Reconsidered, The New York Academy of Sciences, New York, pp. 1-24.
  16. Gupta A. and Ferguson J., 1992, «Beyond ‘Culture’: Space, Identity, and the Politics of Difference», Cultural Anthropology, vol. 7, n. 1, pp. 6-23, DOI: 10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00020
  17. Harvey D., 1990, The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
  18. Inclán-Valadez C., 2014, «Building New Geographies in Urban Mexico: The Case of the Casas Geo», in Irazábal C. (ed.), Transbordering Latin Americas: Liminal Places, Cultures, and Powers (T)Here, Taylor & Francis Group, Routledge, New York, London, pp. 166-186.
  19. Irazábal C., 2005, City Making and Urban Governance in the Americas: Curitiba and Portland, Ashgate, London.
  20. Irazábal C., 2006, «Seductions of Place: Geographical Perspectives on Globalization and Touristed Landscapes», Regional Studies, vol. 40, n. 7, pp. 805-806.
  21. Irazábal C., 2008, ed., Ordinary Places, Extraordinary Events: Citizenship, Democracy, and Public Space in Latin America, Taylor & Francis Group, Routledge, New York, London.
  22. Irazábal C., 2009, «Realizing Planning’s Emancipatory Promise: Learning from Regime Theory to Strengthen Communicative Action», Planning Theory, vol. 8, n. 2, pp. 115-139, DOI: 10.1177/1473095209102230
  23. Irazábal C., 2011, «Ethnoscapes», in Banerjee T. and Loukaitou-Sideris A. (eds.), Companion to Urban Design: Routledge Companions, Taylor & Francis Group, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 562-573.
  24. Irazábal C., 2012, «Transnational Planning: Reconfiguring Spaces and Institutions», in Krätke S., Wildner K. and Lanz S. (eds.), Transnationalism and Urbanism, Taylor & Francis Group, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 72-90.
  25. Irazábal C., 2014, «Introduction: What Do We Mean by ‘Transbordering Latin Americas’?», in Id. (ed.), Transbordering Latin Americas: Liminal Places, Cultures, and Powers (T)Here, Taylor & Francis Group, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 1-19.
  26. Irazábal C. and Gómez-Barris M., 2014, «Diasporic Tourism: Immigrant Politics and Place Making in Los Angeles’s Plaza Mexico», in Irazábal (ed.), op.cit., pp. 96-126.
  27. Jackson P., Crang P. and Dwyer C., 2004, «Introduction: The Spaces of Transnationality», in Id. (eds.), Transnational Spaces, Routledge, London, pp. 1-23.
  28. Jones D., 1992, «Which Migrants? Temporary or Permanent», in Glick Schiller, Basch and Blanc-Szanton (eds.), op. cit., pp. 217-224.
  29. Kearney M., 1991, «Borders and Boundaries of State and Self at the End of Empire», Journal of Historical Sociology, vol. 4, n. 1, pp. 52-74, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6443.1991.tb00116.x.LandoltP.,AutlerL.andBairesS.,1999,«Fromhermanolejanotohermanomayor:TheDialecticsofSalvadoranTransnationalism»,EthnicandRacialStudies,vol.22,n.2,pp.290-315,doi:10.1080/014198799329495
  30. Levitt P., 2001, «Transnational Migration: Taking Stock and Future Directions », Global Networks, vol. 1, n. 3, pp. 195-216, DOI: 10.1111/1471-0374.00013
  31. May J. and Thrift N., 2001, «Introduction», in Id. (eds.), TimeSpace: Geographies of Temporality Routledge, New York, pp. 1-46. Miraftab F., 2014, «Faraway Intimate Development: Global Restructuring of Social Reproduction», in Irazábal (ed.), op. cit., pp. 241-257.
  32. Miraftab F. and Salo K., 2012, Cities and Inequalities in a Transnational World, Joint Area Centers Symposium, March 1-3, Levis Faculty Center, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (http://cgs.illinois. edu/jacs2012).
  33. Moreno Carranco M., 2014, «Global Mexico under Construction: The Santa Fe Megaproject in Mexico City», in Irazábal (ed.), op. cit., pp. 187-214.
  34. Ong A., 1999, Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality, Duke U.P., Durham (NC) and London.
  35. Pedrazzini Y., 2014, «‘The Gang of the Barrio’: Invention and Negative Transnationalization of a Latin American Figure of Urbanity», in Irazábal (ed.), op. cit., pp. 61-76.
  36. Portes A., Guarnizo L.E. and Landolt P., 1999, «The Study of Transnationalism: Pitfalls and Promise of an Emergent Research Field», Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 22, n. 2, pp. 217-237, DOI: 10.1080/014198799329468
  37. Pries L., 2004, «Transnationalism and Migration: New Challenges for the Social Sciences and Education», in Luchtenberg S. (ed.), Migration, Education and Change, Taylor & Francis, Routledge, London and New York, pp. 15-39.
  38. Pries L., 2005, «Configurations of Geographic and Societal Spaces: A Sociological Proposal between ‘Methodological Nationalism’ and the ‘Spaces of Flows», Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, vol. 5, n. 2, pp. 167-190, DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2005.00113.x
  39. Rodríguez N.P., 1995, «The Real ‘‘New World Order’’: The Globalization of Racial And Ethnic Relations in the Late Twentieth Century», in Smith P.M. and Feagin J.R. (eds.), The Bubbling Cauldron: Race, Ethnicity and Urban Crisis, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 211-225.
  40. Roudometof V., 2005, «Transnationalism, Cosmopolitanism and
  41. Glocalization», Current Sociology, vol. 53, n. 1, pp. 113-135, DOI: 10.1177/0011392105048291
  42. Smith M.P., 2001, Transnational Urbanism: Locating Globalization,
  43. Blackwell, Malden, MA.
  44. Stephen L., 2007, Transborder Lives: Indigenous Oaxacans in Mexico, California, and Oregon. Duke U.P., Durham, NC.
  45. Torres R.M. and Momsen J.D., 2005, «Gringolandia: The Construction of a New Tourist Space in Mexico», Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 95, n. 2, pp. 314-335, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00462.x
  46. Tovar-Restrepo M., 2014, «Nations within Nations: Transnationalism and Indigenous Citizenship in Latin America», in Irazábal (ed.), op. cit., pp. 149-165.
  47. Trotz A.D., 2006, «Rethinking Caribbean Transnational Connections: Conceptual Itineraries», Global Networks: A Journal of Transnational Affairs, vol. 6, n. 1, pp. 1-59, DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00132.x
  48. Wimmer A. and Glick Schiller N., 2002, «Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation-State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences », Global Networks, vol. 2, n. 4, pp. 301-334, DOI: 10.1111/14710374.00043

    Impossibile comunicare con Crossref: A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond. (doi.crossref.org:443)

Clara Irazàbal, Transbordering planning: esempi dalle Americhe Latine in "TERRITORIO" 69/2014, pp 7-17, DOI: 10.3280/TR2014-069001