"You Feel At Home Where You Take Root": Neighbourhood Choice And Sense Of Belonging Of Turkish Middle-Class Households

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE
Author/s Heike Hanhörster
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/105 Language English
Pages 14 P. 36-49 File size 219 KB
DOI 10.3280/SUR2014-105003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Numerosi studi evidenziano l’importanza del vicinato locale come "fattore della propria identità". Nel presente contributo vengono discussi l’interazione tra diverse affiliazioni e il conseguente effetto sulle decisioni degli immigrati per quanto concerne la scelta del vicinato. Lo studio si concentra sulle scelte residenziali dei nuclei familiari del ceto medio turco in Germania, analizzando le loro scelte di compromesso tra appartenenza locale e posizionamento sociale in fase di acquisto della proprietà.

Keywords: Neighbourhood Choice, Belonging, Low-Income Neighbourhoods, Residential Relocation, Migrants, Affiliation

  1. Sykes B., Musterd S. (2011). Examining Neighbourhood and School Effects Simultaneously: What Does the Dutch Evidence Show? Urban Studies, 7: 1307-1331. DOI: 10.1177/004209801037139
  2. Watt P. (2009). Living in an oasis: Middle-class disaffiliation and selective belonging in an English suburb. Environment and Planning A, 12: 2874–2892. DOI: 10.1068/a4112
  3. Wellman B., Leighton B. (1979). Networks, Neighborhoods, and Communities: Approaches to the Study of the Community Question. Urban Affairs Review, 14: 363-390. DOI: 10.1177/10780874790140030
  4. Sutterlüty F., Walter I. (2005). Übernahmegerüchte. Klassifikationskämpfe zwischen türkischen Aufsteigern und ihren deutschen Nachbarn. Leviathan 33: 182-204. DOI: 10.1177/004209801037139
  5. Ergebnisse der TIES-Studie zur türkischen und jugoslawischen Einwanderung. IMISBeiträge, 93. DOI: 10.1007/s11578-005-0035-
  6. Savage M., Bagnall G., Longhurst B. (2005). Globalization and belonging. London: Sage. Sürig I., Wilmes M. (2011). Die Integration der zweiten Generation in Deutschland.
  7. Noreisch K. (2007). School catchment area evasion: the case of Berlin, Germany. Journal of Education Policy, 1: 69-90. DOI: 10.1080/0268093060106575
  8. Münch S. (2009): “It’s all in the mix” - Constructing ethnic segregation as a social problem in Germany. Journal of Housing and the Built environment, 4: 441-455. DOI: 10.1007/s10901-009-9160-
  9. Lacy K.R. (2004). Black spaces, black places: Strategic assimilation and identity construction in middle-class suburbia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 6: 908-930. DOI: 10.1080/014198704200026852
  10. Jenkins R. (2008). Social Identity. London, New York: Sage.
  11. Windzio, M. (ed.) Migration und städtischer Raum. Chancen und Risiken der Segregation und Integration. Opladen.
  12. Horr A. (2008). Ethnische und soziale Unterschiede in der Wohnungssuche. In Hillmann, F.;
  13. Holm A. (2014). Die Wiederkehr der Wohnungsfrage. APuZ, 20-21.
  14. Hanhörster H. (2000). Whose neighbourhood is it? Ethnic diversity in urban spaces in Germany. GeoJournal, 4: 329-338. DOI: 10.1023/A:101227301451
  15. Granovetter M.S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380. DOI: 10.1086/22546
  16. Doff W. (2010). Puzzling neighbourhood effects: Spatial selection, ethnic concentration and neighbourhood impacts. Delft: IOS Press.
  17. in new diverse European cities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 7: 1249-1268. DOI: 10.1080/0141987100362406
  18. Crul M., Schneider J. (2010). Comparative integration context theory: participation and belonging
  19. Coulter R., van Ham M. (2013). Following people through time: An analysis of individual residential mobility biographies. Housing Studies, 7: 1037-1055. DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2013.78390
  20. Butler T., Robson G. (2001). Social Capital, Gentrification and Neighbourhood Change in London: A Comparison of Three South London Neighbourhoods. Urban Studies 12: 2145-2162. DOI: 10.1080/0042098012008709
  21. Briggs X., de S. (1998). Brown Kids in White Suburbs: Housing Mobility and the Multiple Faces of Social Capital. Housing Policy Debate, 1: 177-221. DOI: 10.1080/10511482.1998.952129
  22. 2010. Bourdieu P. (1991). Physischer, sozialer und angeeigneter physischer Raum. In Wentz, M. (Ed.). Stadt-Räume. Frankfurt am Main: New York.
  23. Bergström L., van Ham M., Manley D. (2010). Neighbourhood Choice and Neighbourhood Reproduction. In Institute for the Study of Labor (Eds.): Discussion Paper 5238, October
  24. Diskriminierung im Alltag. Abschlussbericht, Berlin.
  25. Antidiskriminierungsstelle des Bundes (Federal Anti-Discrimination Agency) (ed.) (2009).
  26. Andreotti A., Le Galès P., Moreno Fuentes F.J. (2013). Controlling the Urban Fabric: The Complex Game of Distance and Proximity in European Upper-Middle-Class Residential Strategies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2: 576-597. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01177.
  27. Alba R. (2005): Bright vs. blurred boundaries: Second generation assimilation and exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 28: 1: 20-49. DOI: 10.1080/014198704200028000

Heike Hanhörster, "You Feel At Home Where You Take Root": Neighbourhood Choice And Sense Of Belonging Of Turkish Middle-Class Households in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 105/2014, pp 36-49, DOI: 10.3280/SUR2014-105003