A partial defense of metaphysical realism

Journal title EPISTEMOLOGIA
Author/s Michele Marsonet
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2015/2
Language Italian Pages 12 P. 291-302 File size 140 KB
DOI 10.3280/EPIS2015-002008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Despite what many contemporary philosophers claim, the article argues that metaphysical realism can - up to a certain point - be defended. Taking into account the topic "language and metaphysics", we soon realize that any formulation of a world-view is based on a shared language. This neither means, however, that language itself hides reality nor allows us to identify anti-realism and idealism. What worries the metaphysical realist is not the possibility that the real world might be totally different from the one we see; he just wants to avoid the identification of the world with any human conceptualization of it. It should thus be realized that a modest form of metaphysical realism is the best way for recognizing the independence of reality and, at the same time, our deep involvement in it.

Keywords: Language, reality, metaphysics, metaphysical realism, truth, science

  1. Agazzi E. (1995). Filosofia della natura. Scienza e cosmologia, Casale Monferrato, Piemme.
  2. Davidson D. (1984). Inquiries into truth and interpretation, Oxford, Clarendon Press (trad.it. Verità e interpretazione, Bologna, il Mulino, 1994).
  3. Davidson D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective, Oxford, Oxford University Press (trad. it. Soggettivo, intersoggettivo, oggettivo, Milano, Cortina Editore, 2003).
  4. McDowell J. (1994). Mind and World, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press (trad. it. Mente e mondo, Torino, Einaudi, 1999).
  5. Marsonet M. (2000). I limiti del realismo. Filosofia, scienza e senso comune, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  6. Marsonet M. (ed.) (2002). The problem of realism, Aldershot / London, Ashgate.
  7. Marsonet M. (2002). The limits of realism. In Marsonet M. (ed.) (2002), pp. 190-204.
  8. Rorty R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, (trad. it. Conseguenze del pragmatismo, Milano, Feltrinelli, 1986).

  • The problem of evil and critical realism Dominic Effiong Abakedi, Emmanuel Kelechi Iwuagwu, Mary Julius Egbai, in Journal of Critical Realism /2022 pp.196
    DOI: 10.1080/14767430.2021.1992738

Michele Marsonet, Una difesa parziale del realismo metafisico in "EPISTEMOLOGIA" 2/2015, pp 291-302, DOI: 10.3280/EPIS2015-002008