Deliberare, negoziare e argomentare sulle incerte sorti della legge di Hume. Riflessioni a partire da un recente convegno

Journal title TEORIA POLITICA
Author/s Patricia Mindus
Publishing Year 2008 Issue 2008/1
Language Italian Pages 11 P. 145-155 File size 451 KB
DOI
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Deliberating, Negotiating, and Arguing over the Uncertain Destiny of Hume’s Law. Review of a Recent Congress ABSTRACT: This critical note presents an assessment of some theoretical frameworks concerning, first and foremost, the threefold model of argumentation, negotiation and dialogue. The author discusses whether it is possible to bargain over beliefs, following the proposal of Raùl Calvo at the recent XIII Italian-Spanish congress for analytical philosophy of law. Moreover, Mindus takes into account the current debate on Hilary Putnam’s The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and the thesis of so-called entangled objects in law, by discussing the critical outlook offered by José Juan Moreso and Gaetano Carcaterra.

Patricia Mindus, Deliberare, negoziare e argomentare sulle incerte sorti della legge di Hume. Riflessioni a partire da un recente convegno in "TEORIA POLITICA" 1/2008, pp 145-155, DOI: