Journal title PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO
Author/s Hancic Maja Turnsek
Publishing Year 2011 Issue 2010/3
Language Italian Pages 17 P. 112-128 File size 535 KB
DOI 10.3280/PACO2010-003006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The emergence of new, textual ways of publicly accessible discussions among citizens has sparked increased interest among researchers who aspire to measure, via content analysis, different normative criteria of public deliberation in order to evaluate (online) discussion. There seems to be an emerging consensus among researchers on what will be called here "(online) deliberation analysis" - a specific content analysis employed as a tool for evaluation of public deliberation. (Online) Deliberation Analysis is characterised by a specific selection of unit(s) of analysis, selection of cases, and most of all analysis of specific variables: normative ideals of public deliberation. The aim of this article is threefold: first, to present the normative requirements of deliberation as presented in theoretical thought on the public; second, to provide a review of empirical research aimed to analyse these requirements and finally, to propose some possible improvements for future research.
Keywords: Deliberation, Public, Public Sphere, Internet
Hancic Maja Turnsek, La maggiore età dell’analisi della deliberazione pubblica (online). Una rassegna di ricerche empiriche sulla deliberazione pubblica in "PARTECIPAZIONE E CONFLITTO" 3/2010, pp 112-128, DOI: 10.3280/PACO2010-003006