Productivity and innovation: a spatial approach

Journal title ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE
Author/s Marco Lamieri, Ilaria Sangalli
Publishing Year 2013 Issue 2013/2
Language Italian Pages 23 P. 67-89 File size 255 KB
DOI 10.3280/POLI2013-002004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The paper assesses geographic spillovers of firms’ total factor productivity (TFP) through the lens of spatial econometrics. The aim is to use patent data to link the concepts of productivity and innovation, as well as to shed light on the role played by industrial agglomeration economies. TFP estimates are based on a panel of around sixteen thousand Italian manufacturing firms surveyed in the 2004-2010 period, allowing for labor and capital productivity coefficients to vary over sectors of activity. The TFP spillover is then estimated using a spatial autoregressive model with spatial autoregressive disturbances focused on 2010 firm-level geo-referenced data. The results show that firm TFP levels benefit from both the productivity spillovers originated by neighboring firms and the exogenous productivity shocks to the latter. To be part of an agglomeration economy results in productivity advantages. The location in a patent-intensive area acts in the sense of strengthening these effects but results, in turn, to be an advantage also for firms outside districts, thus corroborating the findings of an active role played by innovation in enhancing productivity.

Keywords: TFP, spillover, industrial district, patent, spatial models Parole chiave: TFP, spillover, distretti industriali, brevetti, modelli spaziali

Jel codes: C31, D24, L60, O33, R12

  1. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., Feldman M. 1994. R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76 (2) 336-340 DOI: 10.2307/2109888
  2. Aiello F., Pupo V., Ricotta F. 2008. Sulla dinamica della produttività totale dei fattori in Italia. Un’analisi settoriale. Università della Calabria Working Papers 03-2008
  3. Allegra E., Fiorini M., Grillo M., Magnani L. 2004. Antitrust policy and national growth: some evidence from Italy. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 63 (1): 69-86
  4. Anselin L. 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Kluwer: Boston DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-7799-1
  5. Anselin L., Bera A.K., Florax R., Yoon M.J. 1996. Simple diagnostic tests for spatial dependence. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26 (1): 77-104 DOI: 10.1016/0166-0462(95)02111-6
  6. Arraiz I., Drukker M.D., Kelejian H.H., Prucha I.R. 2007. A spatial Cliff-Ord-type model with heteroskedastic innovations: small and large sample results. University of Maryland Working Paper DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00618.x
  7. Audretsch D.B., Feldman M. 1996. Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86 (3): 630-640.
  8. Bassanetti A., Iommi M., Jona-Lasinio C., Zollino F. 2004. La crescita dell’economia italiana negli anni novanta tra ritardo tecnologico e rallentamento della produttività. Temi di discussione della Banca d’Italia 539
  9. Bivand R.S., Pebesma E.J., Gomez-Rubio V. 2008. Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R. Springer: New York
  10. Boschma R. 2005. Proximity and innovation. A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39 (1): 61-74 DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
  11. Brandolini A., Cipollone P. 2001. Multifactor productivity and labor quality in Italy, 1981-2000. Temi di Discussione della Banca d’Italia 422.
  12. Breschi S., Lissoni F. 2001. Cross-firm inventors and social networks: localized knowledge spillovers revisited. Annales d’Economie et de la Statistique, 79-80: 189-209.
  13. Breschi S., Malerba F. 2001. Geography of innovation and economic clustering. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (4): 817-833 DOI: 10.1093/icc/10.4.817
  14. Bronzini R., Piselli P. 2006. Determinants of long-run regional productivity: the role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure. Temi di Discussione della Banca d’Italia 597 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.935010
  15. Buccellato T., Santoni G. 2012. Produttività totale dei fattori (TFP) delle imprese italiane: uno studio su distretti, aree urbane ed esternalità geografiche. Fondazione Manlio Masi: Roma
  16. Bugamelli M., Rosolia A. 2006. Produttività e concorrenza estera. Temi di Discussione della Banca d’Italia 578
  17. Buganza T., Bandoni P., Verganti R. 2007. Le relazioni tra impresa e università nel paradigma dell’open innovation. Impresa & Stato, 20 (78): 9-16.
  18. Casaburi L., Minerva A., Gattai V. 2008. Firms International Status and Heterogeneity in Performance: Evidence from Italy. Fondazione Enrico Mattei: Milano DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1086317
  19. Ciocca P. 2004. L’economia italiana: un problema di crescita. Rivista Italiana degli Economisti, 9 (Supplemento al n.1): 7-28.
  20. Cliff A.D., Ord J.K. 1973. Spatial Autocorrelation. Pion: London
  21. Colombo M.G., D’Adda D., Piva E. 2009. The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: an empirical analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35 (1): 113-140 DOI: 10.1007/s10961-009-9111-9
  22. Confindustria. 2006. Produttività e attrattività del paese: i nodi da sciogliere. Quaderni di Ricerca di Confindustria 2
  23. Daveri F. 2006. Perché la competitività ha smesso di crescere nell’economia italiana?. Quaderni di Ricerca di Confindustria 2.
  24. Daveri F., Jona-Lasinio C. 2005. Italy’s decline: getting the facts right. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia, 64 (4): 365-410 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.871039
  25. Dettori B., Maroccu E., Paci R. 2008 Total factor productivity, intangible assets and spatial dependence in the European regions. CRENOS Working Papers 23 DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2010.529288
  26. Di Giacinto V., Gomellini M., Micucci G., Pagnini M. 2011. Mapping local productivity advantages in Italy: industrial districts, cities or both?. Temi di Discussione della Banca d’Italia 850
  27. Fachin S., Gavosto A. 2007. The decline in Italian productivity: a study in estimation of long-run trends in total factor productivity with panel cointegration methods. MPRA Papers 3112
  28. Faini R., Sapir A. 2005. Un modello obsoleto? Crescita e specializzazione dell’economia italiana, in Boeri T., Faini R., Ichino A., Pisauro G., Scarpa C. (a cura di) Oltre il declino. il Mulino: Bologna
  29. Fantino D., Mori A., Scalise D. 2012. Collaboration between firms and universities in Italy: the role of a firm’s proximity to top-rated departments. Temi di Discussione della Banca d’Italia 884 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2182579
  30. Feldman M., Audretsch D.B. 1999. Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition. European Economic Review, 43 (2): 409- 429 DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6
  31. Foresti G., Guelpa F., Trenti S. 2009. Effetto distretto: esiste ancora?. Collana Ricerche Intesa Sanpaolo R09-01
  32. Griliches Z. 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10 (1): 92-116 DOI: 10.2307/3003321
  33. ISAE. 2005. Crescita e struttura produttiva dell’Italia: un confronto con i principali paesi industriali. ISAE: Roma
  34. Jaffe A. 1989. Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79 (5): 957-970
  35. Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. 1993. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (3): 577-598 DOI: 10.2307/2118401
  36. Knoben J., Oerlemans L. 2006. Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: a literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8 (2): 71-89 DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00121.x
  37. Le Sage J., Pace R.K. 2009. Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. CRC Press: Boca Raton.
  38. Levinsohn J., Petrin A. 2003. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70 (2): 317-341 DOI: 10.1111/1467-937X.00246
  39. Marrocu E., Paci R., Usai S. 2011. The complementary effects of proximity dimensions on knowledge spillovers. CRENOS Working Papers 21/2011 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1987679
  40. Milana C., Zeli A. 2003. Productivity slowdown and the role of ICT in Italy: a firmlevel analysis. ISAE Working Papers 39 DOI: 10.1787/9789264026780-13-en
  41. Moran P.A.P. 1950. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika, 37: (1-2) 17-33 DOI: 10.2307/2332142
  42. Nicoletti G., Scarpetta S. 2003. Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence. OECD Economics Department Working Papers 347 DOI: 10.1111/1468-0327.00102
  43. Olley S., Pakes A. 1996. The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64 (6): 1263-1297 DOI: 10.2307/2171831
  44. Paci S., Usai R. 2000. The role of specialization and diversity externalities in the agglomeration of innovative activities. Rivista Italiana degli Economisti, 5 (2): 237- 268
  45. Piergiovanni R., Santarelli E., Vivarelli M. 1997. From which source do small firms derive their innovative inputs? Some evidence from Italian industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 12 (2): 243-58.
  46. Pietrabissa R., Conti G. 2005. Strategia per un rapporto responsabile fra ricerca pubblica e industria. L’industria, 26 (3): 419-444.
  47. Piras G. 2010. Sphet: spatial models with heteroskedastic innovations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 35 (1): 1-21
  48. Pyke F., Becattini G., Sengenberger W. (eds.) 1990. Industrial District and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy. International Institute for Labor Studies: Geneva
  49. Ripley B.D. 1981. Spatial Statistics. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht DOI: 10.1002/0471725218
  50. Schmoch U., Laville F., Patel P., Frietsch R. 2003. Linking Technology Areas to Industrial Sectors. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Research. European Commission: Brussels
  51. Sforzi F. 1990. The quantitative importance of Italian industrial districts, in Pyke F., Becattini G., Sengenberger W. (eds.) Industrial District and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy. International Institute for Labor Studies: Geneva
  52. Signorini L.F. (a cura di) 2000. Lo sviluppo locale. Donzelli: Roma
  53. Venturini F. 2004. The determinants of Italian slowdown: what do the data say?. EPKE Working Papers 29.

  • Competitive advantage and industrial district Enrique Claver-Cortés, Bartolomé Marco-Lajara, Pedro Seva-Larrosa, Lorena Ruiz-Fernández, in Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal /2019 pp.211
    DOI: 10.1108/CR-08-2018-0048
  • Firm innovation and spillovers in Italy: Does geographical proximity matter? Paola Cardamone, in Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences /2018 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1007/s12076-017-0193-y
  • A Spatial Analysis of the R&D-Productivity Nexus at Firm Level Paola Cardamone, in Growth and Change /2017 pp.313
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.12169
  • Productivity and spatial proximity: evidence from the Italian food industry Paola Cardamone, in International Review of Applied Economics /2020 pp.327
    DOI: 10.1080/02692171.2020.1732308
  • Spatial agglomeration, innovation and firm survival for Italian manufacturing firms Arnab Bhattacharjee, Ornella Maietta, Fernanda Mazzotta, in Spatial Economic Analysis /2023 pp.318
    DOI: 10.1080/17421772.2023.2176538
  • Are Italian firms performances influenced by innovation of domestic and foreign firms nearby in space and sectors? Anna M. Ferragina, Giulia Nunziante, in Economia e Politica Industriale /2018 pp.335
    DOI: 10.1007/s40812-018-0090-4

Marco Lamieri, Ilaria Sangalli, Produttività e innovazione: un approccio spaziale in "ECONOMIA E POLITICA INDUSTRIALE " 2/2013, pp 67-89, DOI: 10.3280/POLI2013-002004