Discursive representations of family and household commitment in working mothers and fathers

Journal title RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA
Author/s Francesca Alby, Marilena Fatigante, Cristina Zucchermaglio
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/1
Language Italian Pages 26 P. 9-34 File size 268 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2014-001001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In recent decades we have witnessed a massive entry of women into the labor market. This phenomenon has resulted in substantial reorganization in family life and in the ways in which people spend their time dividing it between paid work, leisure and family activities. The temporal pressure caused by coordinating these various activities is particularly heavy in the case of families with children in which both parents work. The article is part of a line of research that explores the division of household labor in the couple within the tradition of ethnographic studies of everyday life of households. The findings, based on analysis of diaries, interviews and videotaped family interactions, focus on: 1) the representations on the part of mothers and fathers of their management practices and coordination of family activities 2) the nature of the cognitive work that such activity of management and coordination implies, 3) the identity representations of mothers and fathers.

Keywords: Mothers, fathers, housework, family interactions, cognitive work, family management

  1. Arcidiacono, F. (2007). L’osservazione dei rientri a casa: studio etnografico della vita quotidiana in famiglia. Rassegna di Psicologia, 14(2), 155-174. DOI: 10.7379/71591
  2. Aronsson, K. (2004). Tattoos, visions and other autobiographical resources. On the narrative fabrics of self-making. Narrative Inquiry, 14(2), 421-429. DOI: 10.1075/ni.14.2.12aro
  3. Aronsson, K. (2006). Doing family. An interactive accomplishment. Text & Talk, 26(4-5), 619-626. DOI: 10.1515/TEXT.2006.025
  4. Balbo, L. (1987). Time to care. Politiche del tempo e diritti quotidiani. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  5. Bianchi, S.M., Robinson, J.P., & Milkie, M.A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage.
  6. Bird, C.E. (1999) Gender, Household Labor, and Psychological Distress: The Impact of the Amount and Division of Housework. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40(1), 32-45.
  7. Blair, S.L., & Lichter, D.T. (1991). Measuring the Division of Household Labor: Gender Segregation of Housework Among American Couples. Journal of Family Issues, 12(1), 91-113. DOI: 10.1177/019251391012001007
  8. Boeri, T., Del Boca, D., & Pissarides, C. (2005). Women at work: an economic perspective. New York: Oxford Univ. press.
  9. Brooks, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2004). The transformation of US gender role attitudes: cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning. Social Science Research, 33(1), 106-133. DOI: 10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00041-3
  10. Campos, B., Graesch, A.P., Repetti, R., Bradbury, T., & Ochs, E. (2009). Opportunity for interaction? A naturalistic observation study of dual-earner families after work and school. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(6), 798-807. DOI: 10.1037/a0015824
  11. Cekaite, A. (2010). Shepherding the child: embodied directive sequences in parent-child interactions. Text & Talk, 30(1), 1-25. DOI: 10.1515/TEXT.2010.001
  12. Daly, K. (1996). Families and Time: Keeping Pace in a Hurried Culture. London: Sage.
  13. Daly, K. (2002). Time, Gender, and the Negotiation of Family Schedules. Symbolic Interaction, 25(3), 323-342. 10.1525/si.2002.25.3.323. 200.
  14. Darrah, C.N. (2007). The Anthropology of Busyness. Human Organization, 66 (3), 261-269.
  15. de Graaf, P.M., & Kalmijn, M. (2006). Divorce Motives in a Period of Rising Divorce: Evidence From a Dutch Life-History Survey. Journal of Family Issues, 27(4), 483-505. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X05283982
  16. De Vault, M. (1991). Feeding the Family. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  17. Doucet, A. (2001). “You See the Need Perhaps More Clearly Than I Have”: Exploring Gendered Processes of Domestic Responsibility. Journal of Family Issues, 22(3), 328-357. DOI: 10.1177/019251301022003004
  18. Doucet, A. (2004). “It’s Almost Like I Have a Job, but I Don’t Get Paid”: Fathers at Home Reconfiguring. Fathering, 2, 277-303. DOI: 10.3149/fth.0203.277
  19. Duncombe, J., & Marsden, D. (1995). «Workaholics» and “whingeing women”: theorising intimacy and emotion work: the last frontier of gender inequality? Sociological review, 43(1), 150-169. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1995.tb02482.x
  20. Elvin-Nowak, Y., & Thomsson, H. (2001). Motherhood as idea and practice: A Discursive Understanding of Employed Mothers in Sweden. Gender & Society, 15(3), 407-428. DOI: 10.1177/089124301015003005
  21. Eurostat (2006). How is the time of women and men distributed in Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, Brussels.
  22. Fox, N. (1997). Reproducing difference: Changes in the lives of partners becoming parents. In M. Luxton (Ed.), Feminism and families: Critical policies and changing practices (pp. 142-162). Halifax: Fernwood.
  23. Frisco, M.L., & Williams, K. (2003). Perceived Housework Equity, Marital Happiness, and Divorce in Dual-Earner Households. Journal of Family Issues, 24(1), 51-73. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X02238520
  24. Frissen, V.A.J. (2000). ICTs in the Rush Hour of Life. The Information Society, 16(1), 65-75. DOI: 10.1080/019722400128338
  25. Ganong, L.H., & Coleman, M. (1999). Changing families, changing responsibilities: family obligations following divorce and remarriage. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  26. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. NJ, Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
  27. Gasparini, G. (2000). La dimensione sociale del tempo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  28. Gershuny, J. (2000). Changing times: work and leisure in post-industrial society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  29. Gillis, J.R. (2001). Never enough time: some paradoxes of modern family time(s). In K. Daly (Ed.), Minding the time in family experience: emerging perspectives and issues (pp. 19-36). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  30. Giorgi, S., & Pontecorvo, C. (Eds.) (2009). Culture familiari tra pratiche quotidiane e rappresentazioni. Etnografia e ricerca qualitativa, 2.
  31. Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, New York: Anchor.
  32. Good, J.S. (2009). Multitasking and attention in interaction: Dealing with multiple tasks in everyday family life. UCLA (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3384038).
  33. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633. DOI: 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
  34. Gottzen, L., & Good, J. (2010). The second half of the “second shift”: Swedish and US fathers’ domestic work responsibility upon return home. Working paper #97, The Center for Everyday Lives of Families, UCLA.
  35. Graesch, A.J., Ragazzini, E., & Ochs, E. (2012). Life at home in the 21st century: 32 families open their doors. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.
  36. Gregson, N., & Lowe, M. (2008). Renegotiating the domestic division of labour? A study of dual career households in north east and south east England. The Sociological Review, 41(3), 475-505. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb00074.x
  37. Hessing, M. (2007). More than Clockwork: Women’s Time Management in Their Combined Workloads. Sociological Perspectives, 37(4), 611-633. DOI: 10.2307/1389281
  38. Hochschild, A.R., & Anne, M. (1989). The second shift. Working parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking Penguin.
  39. Istat (2010). La divisione dei ruoli nelle coppie. Research report. (Retrieved March 23rd 2012 on http://www3.istat.it/salastampa/comunicati/non_calendario/20101110_00/testointegrale20101110.pdf).
  40. Johnson, N. (2002). Gender and rhetorical space in American life, 1866-1910. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
  41. Klein, W., Izquierdo, C., & Bradbury, T.N. (2007). Working Relationships: Communicative Patterns and Strategies among Couples in Everyday Life. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 4(1-2), 29-47. DOI: 10.1080/14780880701473391
  42. Kluwer, E.S., Heesink, J.A.M., & De Vliert, E.V. (2007). The Marital Dynamics of Conflict over the Division of Labor. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(3), 635-653.
  43. Leslie, L.A., Anderson, E.A., & Branson, M.P. (1991). Responsibility for Children: The Role of Gender and Employment. Journal of Family Issues, 12(2), 197-210.
  44. Merderer, H. (1993). Division of Labor in Two-Earner Homes: Task Accomplishment versus Household Management as Critical Variables in Perceptions about Family Work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 133-45.
  45. Ochs, E., & Kremer-Sadlik, T. (2007). Introduction: morality as family practice. Discourse & Society, 18(1), 5-10. DOI: 10.1177/0957926507069451
  46. Ochs, E., Shohet, M., Campos, B., & Beck, M. (2010). Coming together for dinner. In C. K & B. Schneider (Eds.), Workplace flexibility: Realigning 20th century jobs to 21st century workers (pp. 57-70). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  47. Padiglione, V., & Fatigante, M. (2009). Dalla documentazione al patrimonio. Il percorso di restituzione in un’etnografia domestica familiare. Etnografia e Ricerca Qualitativa, 2, 205-224. DOI: 10.3240/29985
  48. Peterson, R.R., & Gerson, K. (2007). Determinants of Responsibility for Child Care Arrangements among Dual-Earner Couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(3), 527-536. DOI: 10.2307/353239
  49. Pontecorvo, C. (2006). Introduzione. Età evolutiva, 85(Special issue “La vita quotidiana delle famiglie italiane di classe media”), 58-61.
  50. Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
  51. Romano, M.C., & Sabbadini, L.L. (2005). I tempi della vita quotidiana. Famiglia Oggi, (8/9), 22-23.
  52. Ronka, A., Malinen, K., Kinnunen, U., Tolvanen, A., & Lamsa, T. (2010). Capturing daily family dynamics via text messages: development of the mobile diary. Community, Work & Family, 13(1), 5-21. DOI: 10.1080/13668800902823581
  53. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
  54. Saraceno, C. (2003). La conciliazione di responsabilità familiari e attività lavorative in Italia: paradossi ed equilibri imperfetti. Polis, 2, 199-228. DOI: 10.1424/9563
  55. Serrano, F., & Fasulo, A. (2011). L’intervista come conversazione. Roma: Carocci.
  56. Shelton, B.A. (1990). The Distribution of Household Tasks: Does Wife’s Employment Status Make a Difference? Journal of Family Issues, 11(2), 115-135. DOI: 10.1177/019251390011002001
  57. Tannen, D., & Goodwin, M.H. (Eds.) (2006). Family Discourse, Framing Family. Text (Special issue), 26(4).
  58. Thistle, S. (2006). From marriage to the market: the transformation of women’s lives and work. Berkeley and Los Angeles: California University Press.
  59. Thompson, L. (1991). Family Work: Women’s Sense of Fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12(2), 181-196. DOI: 10.1177/019251391012002003
  60. VanEvery, J. (1997). Understanding gendered inequality: Reconceptualizing housework. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20(3), 411-420. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00024-1
  61. Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus groups in feminist research. Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21(1), 111-125. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00080-0
  62. Zucchermaglio, C., Alby, F., & Scozzafava, S. (2009). Attivita quotidiane delle famiglie e pratiche di coordinamento. In Gruppo di Studio sulle Disparità di Genere (a cura di), Le questioni sui generi in psicologia sociale: Atti del convegno “Differenze e disparità: le questioni sui generi in psicologia sociale”, Parma, 19-20 febbraio (pp.322-336). Parma: Uni.Nova.

  • The Caregiving Experiences of Fathers and Mothers of Children With Rare Diseases in Italy: Challenges and Social Support Perceptions Paola Cardinali, Laura Migliorini, Nadia Rania, in Frontiers in Psychology 1780/2019
    DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01780
  • Daily Family Routines of Italian and Ecuadorian Immigrant Mothers in Everyday Life Nadia Rania, Laura Migliorini, Stefania Rebora, Paola Cardinali, in Sage Open 2158244015609411/2015
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244015609411
  • Parental Competence in Italy: A Comparison Between Italian and Immigrant Parents Nadia Rania, Laura Migliorini, Stefania Rebora, in Marriage & Family Review /2018 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1080/01494929.2016.1247760
  • Family well‐being during the COVID‐19 lockdown in Italy: Gender differences and solidarity networks of care Nadia Rania, Ilaria Coppola, Francesca Lagomarsino, Rosa Parisi, in Child & Family Social Work /2022 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1111/cfs.12867

Francesca Alby, Marilena Fatigante, Cristina Zucchermaglio, Rappresentazioni discorsive dell’impegno domestico e familiare in madri e padri che lavorano in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 1/2014, pp 9-34, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2014-001001