Attention and confusion: the analytical mental setup as agent of change

Journal title RICERCA PSICOANALITICA
Author/s Stephen Seligman
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/3
Language Italian Pages 21 P. 9-29 File size 107 KB
DOI 10.3280/RPR2014-003002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This paper starts from a wide-ranging observation of what takes place in an analytical relation in its daily unfolding, usually meaning that the analyst pays special attention to the patient. First of all the paper highlights the importance of uncertainty in analytical work with particular reference to the theories of non linear system dynamics that locate complexity and unpredictability at the core of their models and esthetics: the mathematical and scientific validity of these theories gives value to the psychoanalytical sensitivity that is able to accept ambiguity. It then returns to the analyst’s attention as basic element for working towards change.

Keywords: Attention, analytical mental setup, relational psychoanalysis, complexity, non-linear system dynamics, unpredictability

  1. Bachelard G. (1969/1984). The Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press.
  2. Berman E. (2004). Impossible Training: A Relational View of Psychoanalytic Education.
  3. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press (Routledge). Benjamin J. (2005). From many into one: Attention, energy, and the containing of multitudes. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 2: 185-202. DOI: 10.1080/10481881509348826
  4. Bion W.R. (1970). Attention and Interpretation: A Scientific Approach to Insight in Psycho-Analysis and Groups. London: Tavistock.
  5. Dimen M. (accepted for publication). Insider the revolution: Power, sex and technique in Freud’s “Wild Analysis”. Psychoanalytic Dialogues.
  6. Coburn W.J. (2013). Psychoanalytic Complexity: Attitudes that Matter in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. New York and London: Routledge.
  7. Freud S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practising psycho-analysis. Standard Edition, 12: 111-112. London: Hogarth Press, 1958.
  8. Langan R. (1997). On free‐floating attention. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 7, 6: 819-839. DOI: 10.1080/10481889709539222
  9. Mitchell S. (1993). Hope and Dread in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
  10. Salamon G. and Corbett K. (2011). Speaking the Body/Mind Juncture: An Interview With Gayle Salamon. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 21, 2:221-229. DOI: 10.1080/10481885.201-1.562847
  11. Seligman S. (2005). Dynamic systems theories as a metaframework for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 2: 285-319. DOI: 10.1080/10481881509348832
  12. Seligman S. (2006). The Analyst’s theoretical persuasion and the construction of a conscientious analysis: Commentary on a paper by Meira Likierman. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 16, 5: 397-405.
  13. Tarantino Q. (2009). Bastardi senza Gloria. Film.
  14. Thelen E. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 2: 255-284. DOI: 10.1080/10481881509348831

Stephen Seligman, L’attenzione e la confusione: l’assetto mentale analitico come agente del cambiamento in "RICERCA PSICOANALITICA" 3/2014, pp 9-29, DOI: 10.3280/RPR2014-003002