Answers

Journal title RICERCA PSICOANALITICA
Author/s Stephen Seligman
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/3 Language Italian
Pages 8 P. 55-62 File size 33 KB
DOI 10.3280/RPR2014-003006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In answering the criticisms to his paper, Seligman provides evidence of his consistency because he uses them to make his discourse even more complex, based on the and/and method rather than the or/or method typical of many academic discussions. This approach allows him to show with even more clarity a paradoxical aspect of an analyst’s mental functioning: keeping attention focused and at the same time accepting to be often interrupted and distracted from his object. Another issue discussed here is the misconception of considering scientific and linear thinking as one and the same. Lastly, going beyond the conventional terminology allows the Author to see psychoanalysis as a means for reaching something more essential about being - a term common to Winnicott and Heidegger

  1. Bachelard G. (1969/1984). The Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press.
  2. Berman E. (2004). Impossible Training: A Relational View of Psychoanalytic Education.
  3. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press (Routledge). Benjamin J. (2005). From many into one: Attention, energy, and the containing of multitudes. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 2: 185-202. DOI: 10.1080/10481881509348826
  4. Bion W.R. (1970). Attention and Interpretation: A Scientific Approach to Insight in Psycho-Analysis and Groups. London: Tavistock.
  5. Dimen M. (accepted for publication). Insider the revolution: Power, sex and technique in Freud’s “Wild Analysis”. Psychoanalytic Dialogues.
  6. Coburn W.J. (2013). Psychoanalytic Complexity: Attitudes that Matter in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. New York and London: Routledge.
  7. Freud S. (1912). Recommendations to physicians practising psycho-analysis. Standard Edition, 12: 111-112. London: Hogarth Press, 1958.
  8. Langan R. (1997). On free‐floating attention. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 7, 6: 819-839. DOI: 10.1080/10481889709539222
  9. Mitchell S. (1993). Hope and Dread in Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
  10. Salamon G. and Corbett K. (2011). Speaking the Body/Mind Juncture: An Interview With Gayle Salamon. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 21, 2:221-229. DOI: 10.1080/10481885.201-1.562847
  11. Seligman S. (2005). Dynamic systems theories as a metaframework for psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 2: 285-319. DOI: 10.1080/10481881509348832
  12. Seligman S. (2006). The Analyst’s theoretical persuasion and the construction of a conscientious analysis: Commentary on a paper by Meira Likierman. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 16, 5: 397-405.
  13. Tarantino Q. (2009). Bastardi senza Gloria. Film.
  14. Thelen E. (2005). Dynamic systems theory and the complexity of change. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15, 2: 255-284. DOI: 10.1080/10481881509348831

Stephen Seligman, Le risposte in "RICERCA PSICOANALITICA" 3/2014, pp 55-62, DOI: 10.3280/RPR2014-003006