Urban rent and metropolization. The case of Rome

Journal title ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI
Author/s Barbara Pizzo
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2020/suppl. 129
Language Italian Pages 22 P. 64-85 File size 167 KB
DOI 10.3280/ASUR2020-129-S1004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Aim of this contribution is to deepen the urban rent question in its relationship with metropolization. We will clarify how the weak and uncertain metropolization in Rome is closely related to some peculiar modalities of formation and extraction of rent that char-acterize the Roman context. The metropolitan scale in Rome has been largely the result of a discursive construction that fed rent’s mechanism more than any other possible result expected from a rescaling process.

Keywords: Urban rent; metropolizazion; urban planning and political economy; urban transformations.

  1. Aalbers M. (2012) (ed.). Subprime Cities: The Political Economy of Mortgage Markets. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  2. Aalbers M. (2016). The financialization of housing: A political economy approach. London-New York: Routledge.
  3. Anderson M.B. (2014). Class monopoly rent and the contemporary neoliberal city. Geography Compass, 8(1): 13-24.
  4. Ashton P. (2009). An appetite for yield: the anatomy of the subprime mortgage crisis. Environment and Planning A, 41: 1420-1441.
  5. Blečic I. (2017) (a cura di). Lo scandalo urbanistico 50 anni dopo. Sguardi e orizzonti sulla proposta di riforma di Fiorentino Sullo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  6. Brenner N. (2003a). Metropolitan Institutional Reform and the Rescaling of State Space in Contemporary Western Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(4): 297-324. DOI: 10.1177/0969776403010400
  7. Brenner N. (2003b). “Glocalization” as a state spatial strategy: Urban entrepreneurialism and the new politics of uneven development in Western Europe. In: Peck J., Yeung H., eds., Remaking the Global Economy: Economic-geographical Perspectives. London: Sage, 197-216.
  8. Brenner N. (2004). New states spaces: Urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Camagni R. (2012a). Principi di economia urbana e territoriale. Roma: Carocci.
  10. Camagni R. (2012b). Le città del presente, le città del futuro: rendita e ricapitalizzazione. eyesreg.it, 2 (marzo). Testo disponibile al sito: www.eyesreg.it.
  11. Camagni R. (2019). Redistribuzione della rendita urbana: teoria e attualità. In: Baioni M., Caudo G. e Vazzoler N., a cura di, Rendita urbana e redistribuzione. NU3 – Le Note di U3, 2: 15-25.
  12. Cantimori D. (1967) (a cura di). Karl Marx. Il capitale. Roma: Editori Riuniti (ediz. orig. 1867).
  13. Christophers B. (2017). The state and financialization of public land in the United Kingdom. Antipode, 49(1): 62-85.
  14. Christophers B. (2019). The rentierization of the United Kingdom economy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X1987300
  15. Clark E. and Hermele K. (2014). Financialisation of the environment: a literature review. FESSUD Working Paper Series, 32.
  16. Cox K.R. (1998). Spaces of dependences, spaces of engagement and the politics of scale, or: looking for local politics. Political Geography, 17(1): 1-23.
  17. Cox K.R. and Mair A. (1988). Locality and community in the politics of local economic development. Annals of the Association of American geographers, 78(2): 307-325.
  18. Cremaschi M. (2010). Rendita fondiaria e sviluppo urbano nella riqualificazione urbana: per un’ipotesi interpretativa. In: Atti del XXIV Convegno della Società Italiana di Scienza Politica, Venezia, 16-18 sett. -- Testo disponibile al sito: www.sisp.it/files/papers/2010/marco-cremaschi-861.pdf.
  19. d’Albergo E. and Moini G. (2013). Politics, power and the economy in Rome: continuity and change in an urban regime. Métropoles, 12.
  20. d’Albergo E. e Moini G. (2015). Il regime dell’Urbe. Politica, economia e potere a Roma. Roma: Carocci.
  21. d’Albergo E., Moini G. e Pizzo B. (2016). Cosa vuol dire «metropolitano» a Roma? Ambiguità spaziali, economiche e politiche. In: Cellamare C., a cura di, Fuori Raccordo. Abitare l’altra Roma. Roma: Donzelli.
  22. d’Albergo E., Moini G. and Pizzo B. (2018a). The uncertain metropolization in Rome. Economy, space and governance. In: Gross S.J., Gualini E., Lin Y., eds., Constructing metropolitan space. Actors, policies and processes of rescaling in world metropolises. London: Routledge, 172-195.
  23. d’Albergo E., Moini G. e Pizzo B. (2018b). Il negoziato sullo stadio dell’AS Roma: elementi di discontinuità nel regime urbano? In: Coppola A. e Punziano G., a cura di, Roma in Transizione. Governo, strategie, metabolismi e quadri di vita di una metropoli, Roma-Milano: Planum Publisher, 156-167.
  24. De Muro P., Monni S. and Tridico P. (2013). Rome – A Tale of Two Cities: The Development of a Capital City between Discourse and Reality. In: Martinelli F., Moulaert F. and Novy A., eds., Urban and Regional Development Trajectories in Contemporary Capitalism, London/New York: Routledge, 195-213.
  25. Della Seta P. e Della Seta R. (1988). I suoli di Roma: uso e abuso del territorio nei cento anni della capitale. Roma: Editori Riuniti.
  26. Epstein G.A. (2005) (ed.). Financialization and the World Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  27. Fine B. (2010). Locating financialisation, Historical Materialism, 18: 97-116. DOI: 10.1163/156920610X51245
  28. Gaarms J. (1982). Mito e realtà di Roma nella cultura Europea. Viaggio e idea, immagine e immaginazione. In: Storia d’Italia. Annali 5. Torino: Einaudi.
  29. Gaeta L., Janin U. e Mazza L. (2013). Governo del territorio e pianificazione spaziale. Città studi edizioni.
  30. Gaussier N., Lacour C. and Puissant S. (2003). Metropolitanization and territorial scales. Cities, 20(4), 253-263. DOI: 10.1016/S0264-2751(03)00032-
  31. Gramsci A. (1975). Quaderni del carcere. Edizione critica dell’Istituto Gramsci (4 voll., a cura di V. Gerratana, ediz. orig. 1948-51). Torino: Einaudi.
  32. Gotham K.F. (2009). Creating liquidity out of spatial fixity: the secondary circuit of capital and the subprime mortgage crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33: 355-371.
  33. Haila A. (1988). Land as a financial asset: the theory of urban rent as a mirror of economic transformation. Antipode, 20(2): 79-101.
  34. Haila A. (1990). The theory of land rent at the crossroads. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 8(3): 275-296.
  35. Haila A. (1991). Four types of investment in land and property. International journal of urban and regional research, 15(3): 343-365.
  36. Haila A. (2000). Real estate in global cities: Singapore and Hong Kong as property states. Urban studies, 37(12): 2241-2256. DOI: 10.1080/0042098002000279
  37. Halbert L. and Attuyer K. (2016) (eds.). Financialization and the production of urban space. Urban Studies, 53(7), Special Issue. DOI: 10.1177/004209801663542
  38. Harvey D. (1974). Class-monopoly rent, finance capital and the urban revolution. Regional Studies, 8(3-4): 239-255. DOI: 10.1080/0959523740018525
  39. Harvey D. (1985). The urbanization of capital: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. Oxford: Blackwell.
  40. Harvey D. and Chatterjee L. (1974). Absolute rent and the structuring of space by governmental and financial institutions. Antipode, 6(1): 22-36.
  41. Insolera I. (1962). Roma Moderna: da Napoleone I al XXI secolo. Torino: Einaudi.
  42. Insolera I. (1980). Le Città nella Storia d’Italia. Roma. Immagini e realtà dal X al XX Secolo. Bari: Laterza.
  43. ISPRA (2018). Qualità dell’ambiente urbano – XIV Rapporto sullo Stato dell’Ambiente, 82/18 (cap. 2: Suolo e territorio).
  44. Jessop B., Peck J.A. and Tickell A. (1999). Retooling the machine: state restructuring, uneven development, and urban politics. In: Jonas A.E.G and Wilson D., eds., The urban growth machine: critical perspectives two decades later. New York: State University of New York Press, 141-159.
  45. Krätke S. (2014). Cities in contemporary capitalism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5): 1660-1677. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.1216
  46. Lefebvre H. (1974). La production de l’espace. Paris: Anthropos.
  47. Marcelloni M. (2003). Ripensare la città contemporanea, Il nuovo piano regolatore di Roma. Bari-Roma: Laterza.
  48. Moini G. and Pizzo B. (2017). Riding roughshod over People. Reading Politics, Economy and Civil Society in Metropolization. A case study in Rome. In: Reilly T., ed., The governance of Local Communities. Global perspectives and Challenges. New York: Nova Publ.
  49. Moini G., Pizzo B. e Vicari Haddock S. (2019). Business immobiliare e governance urbana: i casi di Porta Nuova a Milano e dell’headquarter BNP Paribas a Roma. In: Quarto rapporto sulle città. Il governo debole delle economie urbane. Bologna: il Mulino, 201-212.
  50. Moulaert F., Rodriguez A. and Swyngedouw E. (2003). The globalized city: Economic restructuring and social polarization in European cities. Oxford University Press.
  51. Natoli A. (1954). Il sacco di Roma. La speculazione edilizia all’ombra del Campidoglio. Roma: Quaderno dell’attivista.
  52. Pacewicz J. (2013). Tax increment financing, economic development professionals and the financialization of urban politics. Socio-Economic Review, 11: 413-440.
  53. Palley T. (2007). Financialization: what it is and why it matters. The Levy Economics Institute. Working Paper, n. 525.
  54. Pagnotta G. (2009). Roma industriale: tra dopoguerra e miracolo economico. Roma: Editori Riuniti University Press.
  55. Park J. (2014). Land rent theory revisited. Science and Society, 78: 8-109.
  56. Piketty T. (2014). Il capitale nel XXI secolo. Milano: Bompiani.
  57. Pizzo B. (2014). (La costruzione di) Una dimensione metropolitana per le città: attori, rappresentazioni, istituzioni. Il caso di Roma in prospettiva comparativa. In: Atti della XVII Conferenza SIU. Roma-Milano: Planum Publisher, 561-570. -- Testo ora disponibile al sito: www.planum.net/xvii-conferenza-nazionale-siu-atelier-4.
  58. Pizzo B. and Altavilla E. (2017). Embedding illegality. Embedding illegality, or when the illegal becomes licit: Planning cases and urban transformations in Rome. In: Chiodelli F., Hall T. and Hudson R., eds., The Illicit and Illegal in Regional and Urban Governance and Development: Corrupt Places. London: Routledge – Regional Studies Association, 164‐180.
  59. Pizzo B. e Di Salvo G. (2015). Il nodo della rendita immobiliare. In: d’Albergo E., Moini G., a cura di, Il regime dell’Urbe. Politica, economia e potere a Roma. Roma: Carocci, 82-95.
  60. Provincia di Roma (2013). Definizioni e determinanti della rendita urbana: metodologia di calcolo e applicazioni all’area metropolitana di Roma. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://lazio.inu.it/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Rendita.pdf.
  61. Salzano E. (2004). Fondamenti di urbanistica. La storia e la norma, Bari-Roma Laterza.
  62. Sanfilippo M. (2005). Il “Generone” nella società romana dei secoli XVII-XX. Roma: Edilazio.
  63. Stoker G. and Mossberger K. (2001). The evolution of urban regime theory: The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review, 36(6): 810-835. DOI: 10.1177/1078087012218510
  64. Stone C.N. (1989). Regime politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence, KA: University Press of Kansas.
  65. Stone C.N. (1993). Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15(1): 1-2.
  66. Tocci W. (2009). L’insostenibile ascesa della rendita urbana, in Il trionfo della rendita urbana. Democrazia e Diritto, 1/2009. DOI: 10.3280/DED2009-00100
  67. van Loon J. (2016). Patient versus impatient capital: the (non-) financialization of real estate developers in the Low Countries. Socio-Economic Review, 14(4): 709-72.
  68. Vercellone C. (2006). Il ritorno del rentier. Salario, rendita, profitto nel capitalismo cognitivo. Posse, 97-111. -- Testo disponibile al sito: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00264034/document.
  69. Vicari P. e Violante A. (2018). Ancora un’eccezione? La crisi fiscale della capitale tra neoliberismo e presunto declino. In: Coppola A. e Punziano G., a cura di, Roma in Transizione. Governo, strategie, metabolismi e quadri di vita di una metropoli. Milano: Planum Publisher, 166-180.
  70. Violante A. and Annunziata S. (2011). Rome-Model: rising and fall of a hybrid neo-liberal paradigm in Southern Europe. In: Annual RC21 Conference, Amsterdam, 7-9.
  71. Ward C. and Aalbers M.B. (2016). Virtual special issue editorial essay: “The shitty rent business”: What’s the point of land rent theory? Urban Studies, 53(9): 1760-1783. DOI: 10.1177/004209801663897

  • Promoting Rental Housing Affordability in European Cities Marco Peverini, pp.81 (ISBN:978-3-031-43691-8)

Barbara Pizzo, Rendita e metropolizzazione. Il caso di Roma in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" suppl. 129/2020, pp 64-85, DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2020-129-S1004