"Appropriative constitution" and professional practices: Legal field actors facing mediation.

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO
Author/s Annalisa Tonarelli
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2020/3 Language Italian
Pages 22 P. 69-90 File size 250 KB
DOI 10.3280/SD2020-003004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In some respects, Italy’s Legislative decree 28/2010, as amended by the Legisla-tive decree 69/2013, converted into Law 89/2013, can be interpreted as a process of "appropriative constitution" of ADR by the agents of the legal field. The present contribution aims to apply some analytical tools proposed by Bourdieu with the aim of understanding the way in which the process of "forced annexation" of me-diation to the legal field has impacted on the paths of signification and practices adopted by the actors who have been most directly involved. It is based on the da-ta collected during a research conducted at the Court of Florence in the context of a broader experimental project aimed at promoting the use of mediation in the civil and commercial field

Keywords: Mediation - Legal field - Bourdieu - Legal professions

  1. Appiah, Kwame Anthony, 2010. The Honor Code. How Moral Revolutions Happen. New York-London: W. W. Norton & Co.
  2. Birks, Peter, 1997. Harassment and Hubris: The Right to an Equality of Respect. Irish Jurist, 10, 1: 1-46.
  3. Bourdieu, Pierre, 1980. Le sense pratique. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
  4. Brunner, Otto, [1939]1983. Land und Herrschaft. Grundfragen der territorialen Verfassungsgeschichte Osterreichs im Mittelalter. Wien: Rohrer. Traduzione italiana Terra e potere: Strutture pre-statuali e pre-moderne nella storia dell’Austria medievale. Milano: Giuffrè.
  5. Darwall, Steven, 1977. Two Kinds of Respect. Ethics, 88, 1: 36-49.
  6. Diamond, Arthur Sigismund, 1971. Primitive Law: Past and Present. London: Methuen.
  7. Doñate Sastre, Miguel, 2011. Derecho vindicatorio corso y derecho positivo francés: dos formas diferentes de concebir la responsabilidad. In Ignasi Terradas Saborit (cur.), Antropología jurídica de la responsabilidad. Santiago de Compostela: Andavira.
  8. Di Lucia, Paolo, & Riccardo Mazzola, 2019. Introduzione. Diritto e vendetta. In Paolo Di Lucia & Riccardo Mazzola (a cura di), Vindicta. Studi e testi sulla giustizia vendicatoria. Milano: LED.
  9. Di Lucia, Paolo, & Lorenzo Passerini Glazel, in print. Hans Kelsen’s Philosophy of Revenge. In Raúl Márquez Porras, Riccardo Mazzola & Ignasi Terradas Saborit (eds.), Vindicatory Justice. Beyond Law and Revenge. Dordrecht: Springer.
  10. Fittipaldi, Edoardo, 2012. Everyday Legal Ontology. A Psychological and Linguistic Investigation within the Framework of Leon Petrażycki’s Theory of Law. Milano: LED.
  11. —, 2013. Per una definizione interdisciplinare di ‘norma’. Sociologia del diritto, 40, 2: 7-35.
  12. —, 2015. Vendetta della vittima vs. vendetta di vergogna. In Giuseppe Lorini & Michelina Masia (a cura di), Antropologia della vendetta. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
  13. —, in print. On Revenge and Punishment: Arguments for a Crucial Distinction. In Raúl Márquez Porras, Riccardo Mazzola & Ignasi Terradas Saborit (eds.), Vindicatory Justice. Beyond Law and Revenge. Dordrecht: Springer.
  14. Hénaff, Marcel, 2002. Le Prix de la Vérité. Le don, l’argent, la philosophie. Paris: Seuil.
  15. Hobbes, Thomas, 1651. Leviathan, 2 voll. London: Crooke.
  16. Holmes, Oliver Wendell, 1881. The Common Law. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
  17. Kazemi-Rached, Ali, 1990. L’Islam et la réparation du préjudice moral. Genève: Droz.
  18. Kelsen, Hans, 1943. Society and Nature. A Sociological Inquiry. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  19. —, [1949]2015. Elementi di teoria pura del diritto. I dattiloscritti della Bancroft Library. In Hans Kelsen, Che cos’è la giustizia? Lezioni americane (a cura di Paolo Di Lucia & Lorenzo Passerini Glazel). Macerata: Quodlibet.
  20. Lorini, Giuseppe, & Wojciech Żełaniec, 2018. The Background of Constitutive Rules. Introduction. Argumenta, 4, 1: 9-19.
  21. Mader, Elke. 1999. Metamorfosis del poder. Persona, mito y visión en la sociedad de Shuar y Achuar (Ecuador, Perú). Quito: Abya-Yala.
  22. Maitland, Frederic William, 1910. The Forms of Action at Common Law: Two Courses of Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Márquez Porras, Raúl, 2018. Afirmando su justicia. El sistema vindicatorio shuar y el desarrollo de la justicia indígena. Disparidades. Revista de Antropología, 73, 1: 177-195.
  24. —, & Riccardo Mazzola, 2019. Vindicatory Justice and the State: Accounts from Yolngu and Shuar Ethnographies. Sociologia del diritto, 45, 3: 71-94.
  25. Mazzola, Riccardo, 2020. Componere. Offesa e riconciliazione nell’ordinamento vendicatorio. Milano: Giuffrè Francis Lefebvre.
  26. Miller, William Ian, 2005[2008]. An Eye for an Eye. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Traduzione italiana Occhio per occhio. Torino: UTET.
  27. Owen, John, [1652]1770. A Dissertation on Divine Justice. London: Hingham-Murgatroyd.
  28. Paliero, Carlo Enrico, 2018. Il sogno di Clitennestra: mitologie della pena. In Carlo Enrico Paliero, Francesco Viganò, Fabio Basile & Gian Luigi Gatta (a cura di), La pena, ancora: fra attualità e tradizione. Studi in onore di Emilio Dolcini. Milano: Giuffrè.
  29. Petrażycki, Leon, 1909-1910. Teorija prava i gosudarstva v svjazi s teoriej nravstvennosti. Sankt Petersburg: Ekateringofskoe Pečatnoe Delo.
  30. Pitt-Rivers, Julian, 1966. Honour and Social Status. In John G. Peristiany (ed.), Honour and Shame: The Values of Mediterranean Society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  31. Riccardo, Gaetano, 2015. Oltre la giuridicità: la vendetta come fatto sociale totale. In Giuseppe Lorini & Michelina Masia (a cura di), Antropologia della vendetta. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
  32. Rosés Tubau, Mariona, 2011. La responsabilidad de la justicia consuetudinaria en Madagascar: el ejemplo de la regulación de los robos de cebúes en la Región de la Haute Matsiatra. In Ignasi Terradas Saborit (cur.), Antropología jurídica de la responsabilidad. Santiago de Compostela: Andavira.
  33. Scovazzi, Marco, 1960[1975]. Aspetti del diritto penale germanico. Studi nelle scienze giuridiche e sociali, 38: 3-29. Riedizione in Marco Scovazzi, Scritti di storia del diritto germanico. Milano: Giuffrè.
  34. Slyomovics, Susan, 2014. How to Accept German Reparations. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  35. Spierenburg, Pieter C., 1998. Masculinity, Violence, and Honor: An Introduction. In Pieter C. Spierenburg (ed.), Men and Violence: Gender, Honor, and Rituals in Modern Europe and America. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
  36. Stewart, Frank Henderson, 1992. Honor. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press.
  37. Terradas Saborit, Ignasi, 2002. La reciprocidad superada por la equidad, el amor y la amistad. Endoxa: Series Filosόficas, 15: 205-249.
  38. —, 2008. Justicia vindicatoria. De la ofensa e indefensión a la imprecación y el oráculo, la vindicta y el talión, la ordalía y el juramento, la composición y la reconciliación. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
  39. —, 2010. Limits and Possibilities of Restorative Justice. Presented at the 6th Biennial Conference, European Forum for Restorative Justice, Bilbao, June 17-19 (unpublished).
  40. —, 2012. Què és la justícia vindicatòria? (Definició i característiques fonamentals). Recerques, 64: 13-30.
  41. —, 2014. Giovanni (Nino) Tamassia y la jurisprudencia vindicatoria. Sociologia del diritto, 41, 1: 57-94.
  42. —, 2015. La vendetta nell’ordinamento vendicatorio. In Paolo Di Lucia & Letizia Mancini (a cura di), La giustizia vendicatoria. Pisa: ETS.
  43. —, 2017. Sir Wilfrid Grigson (1896-1948) juez y etnόlogo. Casos juzgados, justicia vindicatoria y cόdigo penal de la India colonial. Ius fugit, 20: 265-299.
  44. —, 2019. La justicia más antigua: teoría y cultura del ordenamiento vindicatorio. Madrid: Consejo Superior Investigaciones Científicas.
  45. —, in print. Introduction. Understanding Vindicatory Systems. In Raúl Márquez Porras, Riccardo Mazzola & Ignasi Terradas Saborit (eds.), Vindicatory Justice. Beyond Law and Revenge. Dordrecht: Springer.
  46. Tylor, Edward Burnett, [1871]1920. Primitive Culture. Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Language, Art, and Custom. London: Murray.
  47. Verdier, Raymond (dir.), 1980-1984. La vengeance: études d’ethnologie, d’histoire et de philosophie, 4 voll. Paris: Cujas.
  48. —, 2004. La justice vindicatoire: une justice citoyenne. In Raymond Verdier (dir.), Vengeance. Le face-à-face victime/agresseur, Paris: Autrement.
  49. Webster, Timothy, 2019. The Price of Settlement. World War II Reparations in China, Japan and Korea. Journal of International Law and Politics, 51, 3: 301-384.
  50. Wilda, Wilhelm Eduard, 1842. Geschichte des deutschen Strafrechts. Halle: Schwetschke.
  51. Żełaniec, Wojciech, 2015. La vendetta nei paesi nordici all’epoca dei vichinghi. In Giuseppe Lorini & Michelina Masia (a cura di), Antropologia della vendetta. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane.
  52. Znamierowski, Czesław, 1924. Podstawowe pojęcia teorji prawa. Część pierwsza: Układ prawny i norma prawna. Poznań: Fiszer i Majewski.

Annalisa Tonarelli, "Costituzione appropriativa" e pratiche professionali. Gli agenti del campo giuridico di fronte alla mediazione in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO " 3/2020, pp 69-90, DOI: 10.3280/SD2020-003004