A transdisciplinary scenario for health: a new paradigm for psychology and psychologists?

Journal title PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE
Author/s Albino Claudio Bosio, Guendalina Graffigna, Serena Barello
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/2 Language Italian
Pages 17 P. 17-33 File size 325 KB
DOI 10.3280/PDS2021-002003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

A new transdisciplinary approach to health (TDH) based on the participatory involvement of multiple disciplines and multiple actors (scientific and lay) in the construction of answers to social questions of health is affirmed in the scientific field. After describing the phenomenon of TDH in its main features (historical, theoretical, methodological) open questions and perspectives that this approach presents are here focused on. Finally, the reasons for a participatory involvement of psychology and psychologists in the TDH approach are argued.

Keywords: Transdisciplinarity; health; psychology; health psychology.

  1. AA.VV. (2008). Dieci anni di psicologia della salute. Psicologia della Salute, 3: 7-140.
  2. Aagaard‐Hansen J. (2007). The challenges of cross‐disciplinary research. Social Epistemology, 21 (4): 425-438. DOI: 10.1080/02691720701746540
  3. Assmuth T. and Lyytimäki J. (2015). Co-constructing inclusive knowledge within converging fields: environmental governance and health care. Environmental Science & Policy, 51: 338-350.
  4. Bernstein J.H. (2015). Transdisciplinarity: A review of its origins, development, and current issues. Journal of Research Practice, 11 (1): 1-20.
  5. Bosio A.C. (2021). Virus, narrazione sociale e ruolo della scienza. Vita e Pensiero, 1: 28-35.
  6. Bosio A.C. (2014). Pratiche di salute, pratiche di psicologia: per una professionalizzazione della Psicologia della Salute in Italia. Psicologia della Salute, 2: 9-25. DOI: 10.3280/PDS2014-00200
  7. Bosio A.C. e Lozza E. (2021). La costruzione sociale delle professioni psicologiche in Italia: percorsi e agenda building. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 2 (21) (in press).
  8. Bosio A.C. e Morelli L. (2015). Trans-disciplinarietà: prove di dialogo fra scienze. Vita e Pensiero, 5: 123-129.
  9. Calistri P., Iannetti S., Danzetta M.L., Narcisi V., Cito F., Di Sabatino D. and Giovannini A., a cura di (2013). The components of ‘One World–One Health’approach. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 60: 4-13.
  10. Candiani G., Colombo C., Daghini R., Magrini N., Mosconi P., Nonino F. and Satolli R. (2009). Come organizzare una conferenza di consenso. Manuale metodologico. ISS-SNLG, Roma.
  11. Choi B.C. and Pak A.W. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 29 (6): 351.
  12. Colpaert, J. (2018). Transdisciplinarity revisited. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31 (5-6): 483-489. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2018.1437111
  13. Gibbons M, editor (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: Sage Pub.
  14. Graffigna G. and Barello S., a cura di (2018). Engagement: un nuovo modello di partecipazione in sanità. Roma: Il Pensiero Scientifico.
  15. Graffigna G., Barello S., Riva G., Corbo M., Damiani G., Iannone P. and Ricciardi W. (2020). Italian consensus statement on patient engagement in chronic care: Process and outcomes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (11): 4167.
  16. Graffigna G., Barello S., Riva G., Savarese M., Menichetti J., Castelnuovo G. and Bosio A.C. (2017). Fertilizing a patient engagement ecosystem to innovate healthcare: Toward the first Italian Consensus conference on patient engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 8: 812.
  17. Grey M. and Connolly C.A. (2008). “Coming together, keeping together, working together”: Interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary research and nursing. Nursing Outlook, 56 (3): 102-107.
  18. Holmes E.A., O’Connor R.C., Perry V.H., Tracey I., Wessely S., Arseneault L. and Bullmore E. (2020). Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7 (6): 547-560 DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1
  19. Knapp C.N., Reid R.S., Fernández-Giménez M.E., Klein J.A. and Galvin K.A. (2019). Placing transdisciplinarity in context: a review of approaches to connect scholars, society and action. Sustainability, 11 (18): 4899.
  20. Laurance J., Henderson S., Howitt P.J., Matar M., Al Kuwari H., Edgman-Levitan S. and Darzi A. (2014). Patient engagement: four case studies that highlight the potential for improved health outcomes and reduced costs. Health Affairs, 33 (9): 1627-1634.
  21. Lawrence R.J. (2015). Advances in transdisciplinarity: Epistemologies, methodologies and processes. Futures, 65: 1-9.
  22. Llewellyn C., Ayers S., McManus I.C., Newman S.P., Petrie K., Revenson T. and Weinman J., editors (2019). Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Mahan J.L., editor (1970). Toward transdisciplinary inquiry in social sciences. San Diego (CA): Ph. D. Diss., International University.
  24. Mitchell P. (2005). What’s in a name? Multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary. Journal of Professional Nursing, 212 (6): 332-334.
  25. Montuori A. (2005). Gregory Bateson and the promise of transdisciplinarity. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 12 (1-2): 147-158.
  26. Nicolescu B. (2002). La transdisciplinaritè: manifeste. Monaco: Le Rocher.
  27. Nicolescu B., editor (2008). Transdisciplinary: theory and practice. New York: Hampton press.
  28. Piaget J., editor (1972). L’epistemologie des relation intyerdisciplinaires. In L’interdisciplinaritè: problemes d’einsegnement et de la recherche dans l’universitè. Paris: OCDE.
  29. Polk M. (2014). Achieving the promise of transdisciplinarity: a critical exploration of the relationship between transdisciplinary research and societal problem solving. Sustainability Science, 9 (4): 439-451.
  30. Revenson T.A. and Gurung R.A. (2018). Handbook of Health Psychology. New York: Routledge.
  31. Ricci Bitti P.E. (2017). La «liquidità» della professione di psicologo. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 44 (3): 655-662. DOI: 10.1421/88373
  32. Riva G., Marsan P.A. and Grassi C., editors. (2014). Active ageing and healthy living: a human centered approach in research and innovation as source of quality of life (Vol. 203). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS press.
  33. Romano D. (2008). Psicologia della salute e mestiere dello psicologo. Psicologia della Salute, 3: 33-46.
  34. Rosenfield P.L. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science & Medicine, 35 (11): 1343-1357. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90038-R
  35. Schmidt L. and Pröpper M. (2017). Transdisciplinarity as a real-world challenge: A case study on a North–South collaboration. Sustainability Science, 12 (3): 365-379.
  36. Scholz R.W. (2017). The normative dimension in transdisciplinarity, transition management, and transformation science. Sustinability, 9 (6): 991.
  37. Scholz R.W. (2020). Transdisciplinarity: science for and with society in light of the university’s roles and functions. Sustainability Science, 15 (4): 1033-1049.
  38. Scholz R.W. and Steiner G. (2015). The real type and ideal type of transdisciplinary processes: part I—theoretical foundations. Sustainability Science, 10 (4): 527-544.
  39. Shanley L.A., Parker A., Schade S. and Bonn A. (2019). Policy perspectives on citizen science and crowdsourcing. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4 (1): 30.
  40. Sixsmith A., Mihailidis A., Sixsmith J. and Fang M.L., editors (2021). Knowledge, Innovation, and Impact in Health: A Guide for the Engaged Researcher. Switzerland: Springer.
  41. Stilgoe J., ed. (2009). Citizen Scientists: reconnecting science with civil society. London: Demos.
  42. Takeuchi M.A., Sengupta P., Shanahan M.C., Adams J.D. and Hachem M. (2020). Transdisciplinarity in STEM education: a critical review. Studies in Science Education, 56 (2): 213-253. DOI: 10.1080/03057267.2020.1755802
  43. Van Bewer V. (2017). Transdisciplinarity in health care: a concept analysis. Nursing Forum, 52 (4): 339-347.
  44. Whitehouse P.J., Bodiford K., Standar P., Aarali A.N., Asiimwe S., Vegter V. and Torres-D P. (2021). Intergenerative Transdisciplinarity in “Glocal” Learning and Collaboration. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 12. DOI: 10.22545/2021/0015

  • Beauty Therapy to Support Psychosocial Recovery from Oncological Care: A Qualitative Research on the Lived Experience of Women with Breast Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy Denise Vagnini, Massimo Maria Grassi, Francesco Valenti, Emilio Bombardieri, Emanuela Saita, in Current Oncology /2024 pp.2527
    DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31050189
  • Valutazione e trattamento dei disturbi del neurosviluppo: dalle diagnosi nosografiche a quelle funzionali Santo Di Nuovo, in RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA 4/2023 pp.69
    DOI: 10.3280/rip2022oa15629
  • "E pluribus unum"? From colors to psychology Santo Di Nuovo, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 2/2023 pp.77
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc2-2022oa14836
  • Generating a beneficial creative chaos to manage compartmentalization in psychology: A trans-disciplinary approach to intertwine plurality and unity A. Claudio Bosio, in RIVISTA DI PSICOLOGIA CLINICA 2/2023 pp.63
    DOI: 10.3280/rpc2-2022oa14879

Albino Claudio Bosio, Guendalina Graffigna, Serena Barello, Uno scenario transdisciplinare per la salute: nuovo paradigma per la psicologia e gli psicologi? in "PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE" 2/2021, pp 17-33, DOI: 10.3280/PDS2021-002003