Some remarks on the new role of consumers, firms and finance in energy and climate regulation

Journal title ECONOMIA PUBBLICA
Author/s Alberto Biancardi
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/3 Language Italian
Pages 30 P. 129-158 File size 351 KB
DOI 10.3280/EP2021-003006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This paper takes as starting point the role and the objectives that liberalizations, as well as economic regulation, have been playing since the eighties of last centu-ry to current times. The reason is that the current European normative framework of energy systems and of Green New Deal is still the reference model. The growing awareness about the consequences coming from the climate change, combined with the supply of new technologies for energy and contigu-ous sectors, among the various impulses to change, is challenging this reference model. Once outlined the reasons of this challenge and the main open issues of this de-bate, the paper aims to focus on the new role that consumers, firms and finance could have for fostering the actions against climate change as well as for the adoption of these new technologies.

Keywords: economic regulation, energy, environment, impact

Jel codes: A12, A13, B4, I51, Q4

  1. ACER, CEER (2019). The Bridge Beyond 2025 – Conclusion Paper. Ljubljana, Bruxelles. -- https://extranet.acer.europa.eu/Official_documents/Acts_of_the_ Agency/SD_The%20Bridge%20beyond%202025/The%20Bridge%20Beyond %202025_Conclusion%20Paper.pdf.
  2. ARERA (2019). Documento per la consultazione 322/2019/R/eel -- https://www.arera.it/it/docs/19/322-19.htm.
  3. ARERA (2020). Delibera 318/2020/R/eel -- https://www.arera.it/it/docs/20/318-20.htm.
  4. ARERA (2021). Delibera 130/2021/A -- https://www.arera.it/it/docs/21/130-21.htm.
  5. Banca d’Italia (2021). Carta degli investimenti sostenibili della Banca d’Italia -- https://www.bancaditalia.it/compiti/riserve-portafoglio-rischi/cis/index.html.
  6. Bandura A. (2016). Moral Disengagement. New York: Worth Publishers (trad. it. Disimpegno morale. Trento: Edizioni Centro Studi Erickson S.p.A. 2017).
  7. Borenstein S. (2012). The Private and Public Economics of Renewable Electricity Generation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(1): 67-92
  8. Campiglio E. (2016). Beyond Carbon Pricing. The Role of Banking and Monetary Policy in Financing the Transitionto a Low-carbon Economy. Ecological Economics, 121: 220-230.
  9. Cohen R. (2020). Impact: Reshaping capitalism to drive real change. New York: Guilford Press.
  10. Cretì A., Fontini F. (2019). Economics of Electricity: Markets, Competition and Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Freiberg D., Park D.G., Serafeim G., Zochowski T. R. (2021). Corporate Environment Impact: Measurement, Data and Information. Impact-Weighted Accounts Project Research Report. Working Paper 20-098. Harvard Business School -- https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=57938.
  12. Heald S. (2017). Climate Silence, Moral Disengagement, and Self-Efficacy: How Albert Bandura's Theories Inform Our Climate-Change Predicament. Environment: Science on Policy for Sustainable Development, 59(6): 4-15 DOI: 10.1080/00139157.2017.1374792.
  13. Kanhemann D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Ciroux (trad. it. Pensieri lenti e veloci. Milano: Mondadori, 2012).
  14. Pothitou M., Athanasios J.K., Varga L., Gu S. (2016). A framework for targeting household energy savings through habitual behavioural change. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 35(7): 686-700 DOI: 10.1080/14786451.2014.936867.
  15. Requate T. (2015). Green tradable certificates versus feed-in tariffs in the promotion of renewable energy shares. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 17: 211-239. DOI: 10.1007/s10018-014-0096-8.
  16. Sandel M. J. (2012). What money can’t buy: the moral limits of markets. New York: Farrar, Straus and Ciroux (trad. it. Quello che i soldi non possono comprare. I limiti morali del mercato. Milano: Feltrinelli, 2015).
  17. Serafeim G., Trinh K. (2020). A Framework for Product Impact-Weighted Accounts. Impact-Weighted Accounts Project Research Report. Working Paper 20-076. Harvard Business School -- https://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=57580.
  18. Thaler R. H., Sunstein C. R. (2008). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Yale University Press (trad. it. Nudge. La spinta gentile. La nuova strategia per migliorare le nostre decisioni su denaro, salute, felicità. Milano: Feltrinelli 2009).
  19. United Nations Environment Programme (2017). On the Role of Central Bank in Enhancing Green Finance. Inquiry Working Paper 17/01, Feb 2017.
  20. Venugopal A., Shukla D. (2019). Identifying consumers' engagement with renewable energy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(1): 53-63 DOI: 10.1002/bse.2185.

Alberto Biancardi, Un nuovo ruolo per consumatori, imprese e finanza nella regolazione dei settori energia-clima in "ECONOMIA PUBBLICA " 3/2021, pp 129-158, DOI: 10.3280/EP2021-003006