Assessment to promote lifelong learning: The relation between formative assessment and self-regulated learning

Journal title EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY
Author/s Irene Dora Maria Scierri, Davide Capperucci
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/2
Language Italian Pages 14 P. 62-75 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/ess2-2021oa12396
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Current educational policies focus on the need to transform teaching and assessment practices to support the acquisition of transversal competences necessary for a sustainable development vision and lifelong learning capacity. This article examines the role that formative assessment plays in promoting one of these key competences: learning to learn. After examining the construct of self-regulated learning as a component of learning to learn competence, the main connections between formative assessment and self-regulated learning are discussed. It is pointed out that the central role of feedback, the definition of objectives and strategies and the articulation in iterative phases are aspects of the two processes linked and in strong interaction. The emerging overview suggests that formative assessment practices should be implemented as self-regulating learning strategies. Future research in this field is potentially fruitful for a redefinition of assessment practices that can offer students better opportunities to develop the ability to manage their own learning.

Keywords: ; formative assessment; assessment for learning; self-regulated learning; lifelong learning; learning to learn

  1. Andrade H., Brookhart, S.M. (2016). The role of classroom assessment in supporting self-regulated learning. In: Allal L., Laveault D., a cura di, Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (pp. 293-309). Cham: Springer.
  2. Black P., Wiliam D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice. 5(1): 7-73. DOI: 10.1080/0969595980050102.
  3. Butler D.L., Winne P.H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: a theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3): 245-281. DOI: 10.3102/00346543065003245.
  4. Capperucci D. (2020). Strumenti per valutare l’apprendere ad apprendere: un percor-so di ricerca-formazione realizzato con gli insegnanti del primo ciclo. Ricerche Pedagogiche, 54(214): 121-144.
  5. Chen P.P., Bonner S.M. (2020). A framework for classroom assessment, learning, and self-regulation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4): 373-393. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2019.1619515.
  6. Chiappetta Cajola L., Ciraci A.M. (2019). La promozione delle competenze chiave per l’apprendimento permanente nel sistema scolastico italiano. Il ruolo degli insegnanti. In: Aleandri G., a cura di, Lifelong and lifewide learning and education: Spagna e Italia a confronto (pp. 81-97). Roma: Roma Tre-Press.
  7. Clark I. (2012). Formative assessment: Assessment is for self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24(2): 205-249. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-011-9191-6.
  8. Consiglio dell’Unione europea (2018). Raccomandazione del Consiglio relativa alle competenze chiave per l’apprendimento permanente. Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea, IT 4.6.2018 (2018/C 189/1). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01).
  9. Corsini C. (2018). Una valutazione per il successo formativo. In: Scierri I.D.M., Bartolucci M., Salvato R., a cura di, Lettura e dispersione (pp. 193-209). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  10. Deakin Crick R. (2007). Learning how to learn: the dynamic assessment of learning power. The Curriculum Journal, 18(2): 135-153. DOI: 10.1080/09585170701445947.
  11. Domenici G. (2019). Qualità dell’insegnamento e apprendimento scolastico: il quadro attuale. In: Domenici G., Biasi V., (a cura di), Atteggiamento scientifico e formazione dei docenti (pp. 15-26). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  12. Ferretti F., Bolondi G., Vannini I., Ciani A. (2019). Analisi dei bisogni formativi degli insegnanti nel campo della valutazione. Triangolazione di risultati di indagini osservative su convinzioni e pratiche. In: Lucisano P., Notti A.M., (a cura di), Training actions and evaluation processes. Atti del Convegno Internazionale SIRD (pp. 345-362). Lecce-Rovato: Pensa Multimedia.
  13. Hattie J., Timperley H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Re-search, 77(1): 81-112. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4624888.
  14. Hautamäki J., Arinen P., Eronen S., Hautamäki A., Kupiainen S., Lindblom B. Niemivirta M., Pakaslahti L., Rantanen P., Scheinin P. (2002). Assessing learning-to-learn: a framework. Helsinki: Opetushallitus.
  15. Li L., Grion V. (2019). The power of giving feedback and receiving feedback in peer assessment. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 11(2): 1-17. https://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/413.
  16. Lucisano P., De Luca A.M., Zanazzi S. (2021). Le risposte degli insegnanti all’emergenza COVID-19. In: AA.VV., La DaD in emergenza: vissuti e valutazioni degli insegnanti italiani. Scelte metodologiche e primi risultati nazionali (pp. 13-51). Lecce-Rovato: Pensa Multimedia.
  17. Martini S., Restiglian E. (2019). From system evaluation to teaching. A case study. Form@re - Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 19(1): 339-353. DOI: 10.13128/formare-24604.
  18. McMichael P. (2017). The Shared Humanity of Global Development: Biopolitics and the SDGs. Globalizations, 14(3): 335-336. DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2017.1281627.
  19. Nazioni Unite (2015). Risoluzione adottata dall’Assemblea generale del 25 settem-bre 2015. Trasformare il nostro mondo: l’Agenda 2030 per lo sviluppo sostenibile. https://unric.org/it/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/11/Agenda-2030-Onu-italia.pdf.
  20. Nicol D.J, Macfarlane‐Dick D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2): 199-218. DOI: 10.1080/03075070600572090.
  21. OECD (2020). What Students Learn Matters: Towards a 21st Century Curriculum. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/d86d4d9a-en.
  22. Orsmond P., Merry S., Reiling K. (2002). The use of formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(4): 309-323. DOI: 10.1080/0260293022000001337.
  23. Panadero E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in psychology, 8, Article 422. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422.
  24. Panadero E., Andrade H., Brookhart S. (2018). Fusing self-regulated learning and formative assessment: a roadmap of where we are, how we got here, and where we are going. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1): 13-31. DOI: 10.1007/s13384-018-0258-y.
  25. Pastore S. (2017). What teachers need for a sound assessment. Form@re - Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 17(3): 38-51. DOI: 10.13128/formare-21256.
  26. Pintrich P.R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In: Boeka-erts M., Pintrich P., Zeidner M., a cura di, Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego: Academic Press.
  27. Puustinen M., Pulkkinen L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45(3): 269-286. DOI: 10.1080/00313830120074206.
  28. Robasto R. (2017). The challenge of improvement. Between models and outcomes of self-assessment processes. Form@re - Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 17(3): 205-215. DOI: 10.13128/formare-21273.
  29. Sachs J., Kroll C., Lafortune G., Fuller G., Woelm F. (2021). Sustainable Development Report 2021. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781009106559.
  30. Sala A., Punie Y., Garkov V., Cabrera Giraldez M. (2020). LifeComp: The European Framework for Personal, Social and Learning to Learn Key Competence, EUR 30246 EN. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2760/302967.
  31. Scierri I.D.M. (in press). Strategie e strumenti di valutazione formativa per promuovere l’apprendimento autoregolato: una rassegna ragionata delle ricerche empiriche. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies. DOI: 10.7358/ecps-2021-024-scie.
  32. Scierri I.D.M., Batini F. (2018). La valutazione per favorire l’apprendimento: il caso di un corso di studi universitario. Lifelong, Lifewide Learning, 14(31): 110-123. DOI: 10.19241/lll.v14i31.109.
  33. Scierri I.D.M., Toti G., Barbisoni G., Pera E., Salvadori I., Capperucci D., Batini F. (2021). Modalità didattiche e valutative utilizzate nella didattica a distanza durante l’emergenza Covid-19: focus sui dati di Toscana e Umbria e approfondimenti sull’indagine nazionale SIRD. In: Lucisano P., a cura di, RICERCA e DIDATTICA per promuovere intelligenza comprensione e partecipazione. Atti del X Convegno della SIRD. I Tomo (pp. 158-176). Lecce-Rovato: Pensa Multimedia.
  34. Tessaro F. (2015). La valutazione di sistema e le politiche educative tra accountability e improvement. In: Galliani L., a cura di, L’agire valutativo. Manuale per docenti e formatori (pp. 265-279). Brescia: La Scuola.
  35. Trinchero R. (2014). Il Servizio Nazionale di Valutazione e le prove Invalsi. Stato dell’arte e proposte per una valutazione come agente di cambiamento. Form@re - Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 4(14): 34-49. DOI: 10.13128/formare-15794.
  36. Trinchero R. (2017). Attivare cognitivamente con la valutazione formante. In: Notti A.M., a cura di, La funzione educativa della valutazione. Teorie e pratiche della valutazione educativa (pp. 73-90). Lecce-Rovato: Pensa MultiMedia.
  37. Wiliam D., Thompson M. (2008). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In: Dwyer C.A., a cura di, The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53-82). New York: Erlbaum.
  38. Wirth J., Leutner D. (2008). Self-Regulated learning as a competence. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216(2): 102-110. DOI: 10.1027/0044-3409.216.2.102.
  39. Zimmerman B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In: Boekaerts M., Pintrich P.R., Zeidner M., a cura di, Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-40). San Diego: Academic Press.

  • Narrare la valutazione: il taccuino nella formazione dei futuri docenti Philipp Botes, Carlotta Ricci, Gianluca Angelini, in IUL Research 3/2024 pp.360
    DOI: 10.57568/iulresearch.v5i9.518

Irene Dora Maria Scierri, Davide Capperucci, La valutazione per promuovere l’apprendimento permanente: il rapporto tra formative assessment e self-regulated learning in "EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY" 2/2021, pp 62-75, DOI: 10.3280/ess2-2021oa12396