Accessibility by proximity in a mountain area

Journal title ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI
Author/s Paola Pucci, Luigi Carboni, Giovanni Lanza
Publishing Year 2023 Issue 2022/135 Language Italian
Pages 22 P. 5-26 File size 284 KB
DOI 10.3280/ASUR2022-135001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The paper introduces the outcomes of a research on the accessibility to the main daily services in the Apennine municipalities in Val Trebbia and Nure. Experiencing two accessibility indices for measuring the access to territorial and local services, the paper deals with the concept of accessibility by proximity in a mountain context, characterized by a low settlement density, in order to guarantee inclusiveness, and coping with the depopulation processes affecting these territories.

Keywords: accessibility by proximity; inner areas; daily services; Trebbia valley; Nure valley.

  1. Ascher F. (2004). Les sens du mouvement: modernité et mobilités dans les sociétés urbaines contemporaines. In: Allemand S., Ascher F. et Lévy J., sous la direction de, Les sens du movement. Paris: Belin: 21-34.
  2. Barca F. e Carrosio G. (2020). Un modello di policy place-based: la Strategia Nazionale per le Aree Interne. In: Osti G. e Jachia E., Attivare. Un disegno di rinascita delle aree interne. Bologna: il Mulino.
  3. Carrosio G. e Faccini A. (2018). Le mappe della cittadinanza nelle aree interne. In: De Rossi A., a cura di, Riabitare l’Italia. Le aree interne tra abbandoni e riconquiste. Roma: Donzelli.
  4. Cotella G. and Vitale Bovarone E. (2020). Improving Rural Accessibility: A Multilayer Approach. Sustainability, 12: 2876.
  5. Currie G. and Delbosc A. (2010). Modelling the social and psychological impacts of transport disadvantage. Transportation, 37(6): 953-966.
  6. Cresswell T. (2006). On the Move: Mobility in the Modern Western World.
  7. London: Routledge.
  8. Farrington J.H. (2007). The new narrative of accessibility: its potential contribution to discourses in transport geography. Journal of Transport Geography, 15(5): 319-330.
  9. Farrington J. and Farrington C. (2005). Rural accessibility, social inclusion and social justice: towards conceptualisation. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1): 1-12.
  10. Geurs K.T. and van Wee B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12: 127-140.
  11. Geurs K.T., Boon W. and van Wee B. (2009). Social impacts of transport: literature review and state-of-the-practice transport appraisal in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Transport reviews, 29(1): 69-90.
  12. Kaufmann V., Bergmann M.M. and Joye D. (2004). Motility: Mobility as Capital.
  13. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(4): 745-756.
  14. Kenyon S., Lyons G. and Rafferty J. (2002). Transport and social exclusion: Investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, 10(3): 207-219. DOI: 10.1016/S0966-6923(02)00012-
  15. Lucas K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20: 105-113.
  16. Lucas K., van Wee B. and Maat K. (2016). A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches. Transportation, 43(3): 473-490.
  17. Martens K. (2006). Basing Transport Planning on Principles of Social Justice. Berkeley Planning Journal, 19: 1-17.
  18. Martens K. (2017). Transport Justice: Designing Fair Transportation Systems. New York-London: Routledge.
  19. Moreno C. (2016). La ville du quart d’heure: pour un nouveau chrono-urbanisme. -- Testo disponibile al sito: www.latribune.fr/regions/smart-cities/la-tribune- de-carlos-moreno/ la-ville-du-quart-d-heure-pour-un-nouveau-chrono- urbanisme-604358.html (ultimo accesso: 27/09/2021).
  20. Partenariato Istituzionale Area Interna Appennino Piacentino Parmense (2020). Strategia d’area Appennino Smart. Allegato all’Accordo Quadro per l’area strategica di progetto. Piacenza. -- Testo disponibile al sito: www. agenziacoesione.gov.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/apq-piacentino-parmense. pdf (ultimo accesso: 28/01/2022).
  21. Pucci P. (2019). Dialogando sui movimenti. La mobilità come capitale spaziale. In: Perrone C. e Paba G., a cura di, Confini, movimenti, luoghi. Politiche e progetti per città e territori in transizione. Roma: Donzelli, 59-68
  22. Pucci P., Vecchio G., Bocchimuzzi L. and Lanza G. (2019). Inequalities in job- related accessibility: testing an evaluative approach and its policy relevance in Buenos Aires. Applied Geograph, 107: 1-11.
  23. Pucci P., Colleoni M., Daconto L. e Vendemmia B. (2021). Accessibilità di prossimità in contesti a bassa densità: reti e servizi di mobilità per territori inclusivi. In: Coppola A. et al., a cura di, Politiche e progetti territoriali contro le disuguaglianze e per la transizione ecologica. Bologna: il Mulino.
  24. van Wee B. and Geurs K. (2011). Discussing equity and social exclusion in accessibility evaluations. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 11(4): 350-367.

Paola Pucci, Luigi Carboni, Giovanni Lanza, Accessibilità di prossimità in un territorio montano in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 135/2022, pp 5-26, DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2022-135001