The right to be forgotten between substantive definition and judicial remedies. Reflections starting from the most recent jurisprudence of the Court of Cassation and the Court of Justice of the European Union on de-listing.
Journal title DIRITTO COSTITUZIONALE
Author/s Ornella Spataro
Publishing Year 2023 Issue 2023/1
Language Italian Pages 27 P. 113-139 File size 254 KB
DOI 10.3280/DC2023-001006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The most recent judgements of the Court of Cassation and the Court of Justice of the European Union offer food for thought, to outline the different attitude of the balance between the protection of personal data and the right to information in the digital environment. These rulings in particular point out the reference to de-indexing as a useful remedy for the purpose of balancing opposing interests that does not disproportionately penalize the right to information, according to methods which, after some uncertainties, seem to highlight elements of convergence in the relative protection between the State level and the European level.
Keywords: Right to be forgotten, Digital identity, Deletion of data, Delisting, Right to information, Balancing
Ornella Spataro, Il diritto all’oblio tra definizione sostanziale e rimedi di tutela. Riflessioni alla luce della giurisprudenza più recente della Corte di Cassazione e della Corte di Giustizia dell’Unione Europea in materia di deindicizzazione in "DIRITTO COSTITUZIONALE" 1/2023, pp 113-139, DOI: 10.3280/DC2023-001006