Problems of legal provision of sanitary and epidemiological sustainability and well-being of the population in the context of modern challenges

Journal title RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'
Author/s Gulnar Aigarinova, Maksat Yelikbai, Saltanat Beisebaeva, Auyelkhan Sabirov, Adema Suttibayeva
Publishing Year 2023 Issue 2023/1 T.
Language English Pages 17 P. 29-45 File size 124 KB
DOI 10.3280/RISS2023-001-S1003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The relevance is conditioned by the need for a substantive investigation of the current state of the problems of legal provision of epidemiological safety of the population in the context of modern challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose is a qualitative investigation of the problems of legal provision of sanitary safety of the population in the context of modern challenges, and the search for effective opportunities to ensure legal protection of measures for the qualitative solution of problematic issues related to solving the problems of epidemiological safety of the main segments of the population. The results indicate significant successes achieved to date in the Republic of Kazakhstan in matters of legal regulation of sanitary and epidemiological safety of the population.

Keywords: legal support; sanitary and epidemiological safety; COVID-19 pandemic; globalisation; public safety; epidemiological situation.

  1. Chatterjee S. (2021). COVID-19: Tackling global pandemics through scientific and social tools. London: Academic Press.
  2. Choi S., Kang D., Park D., Lee H. and Choi B. (2017). Developing asbestos job exposure matrix using occupation and industry specific exposure data (1984- 2008) in Republic of Korea. Safety and Health at Work, 8(1): 105-115.
  3. Grumezescu A., Holban A.M. (2018). Food safety and preservation. Oxford: Elsevier.
  4. Hassauer C., Roosen J. (2020). Toward a conceptual framework for food safety criteria: Analyzing evidence practices using the case of plant protection products. Safety Science, 127, 104683.
  5. Hidalgo J., Rodríguez-Vega G. and Pérez-Fernández J. (2021). COVID-19 Pandemic. London: Academic Press.
  6. Horislavska I. and Patratii, O. (2022). Public associations in the field of medical tourism: Role and international experience. Law. Human. Environment, 13(1): 26-33.
  7. Hull M., Bowman D. (2018). Nanotechnology environmental health and safety. London: Academic Press.
  8. Kalinichenko A. and Havrysh V. (2019). Feasibility study of biogas project development: Technology maturity, feedstock, and utilization pathway. Archives of Environmental Protection, 45(1): 68-83.
  9. Kang D., Jung S., Kim Y.J., Kim J., Choi S., Yeong S. and Kim, Y. (2021). Reconstruction of the Korean asbestos job exposure matrix. Safety and Health at Work, 12(1): 74-95.
  10. Kaplina O. and Sharenko S. (2020). Access to justice in Ukrainian criminal proceedings during the covid-19 outbreak. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 3(2-3): 115-133.
  11. Karbivska U., Kurgak V., Gamayunova V., Butenko A, Malynka L., Kovalenko I., Onychko V., Masyk I., Chyrva A., Zakharchenko E., Tkachenko O. and Pshychenko O. (2020). Productivity and quality of diverse ripe pasture grass fodder depends on the method of soil cultivation. Acta Agrobotanica, 73(3), 7334.
  12. Kassich V., Kasianenko O., Klishchova Z., Kasianenko S. and Mozghovyi M. (2023). Immunological reactivity of animals with tuberculosis under the influence of ionising radiation. Scientific Horizons, 26(3): 24-35.
  13. Killewo J., Heggenhougen K. and Quah S. (2020). Epidemiology and demography in public health. Oxford: Woodhead Publishing.
  14. Kim E.A. (2020). Social distancing and public health guidelines at workplaces in Korea: Responses to COVID-19. Safety and Health at Work, 11(3): 275-283.
  15. Konev I.K. (2020). Sanitary and epidemiological welfare of citizens and restrictive regimes in administrative law. Bulletin of Economic Security, 3: 225-231.
  16. Koval N. and Luchenko D. (2020). Non-tariff barriers: Ukrainian practice under conflict with russia and covid-19. Lex Portus, 4(24): 56-76.
  17. Li L., Wang F., Zhang J., Wang K., De X., Li L. and Zhang Y. (2021). Typical phthalic acid esters induce apoptosis by regulating the PI3K/Akt/Bcl-2 signaling pathway in rat insulinoma cells. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 208, 111461.
  18. Luchenko D. and Georgiievskyi I. (2021). Administrative restrictions in ports: Practice of crew rotations during covid-19 pandemic. Lex Portus, 7(3): 7-31.
  19. Martinovic A., Oh S. and Lelieveld H. (2021). Ensuring global food safety. Oxford: Elsevier.
  20. Mernyk A., Yaroshenko O., Inshyn M., Lukianov D. and Hyliaka O. (2021). Vaccination: Human right or duty. Georgian medical news, (315): 135-140.
  21. Nematov A.R., Sobitdukht N.P. (2020). Legal support of environmental safety in the context of globalization, global threats and challenges on the example of a pandemic. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, 33(24): 513- 529.
  22. Nesterenko V. and Rosokhata A. (2023). Marketing communication in the context of the optimal model of the national pattern system of waste management in Ukraine. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 27(2): 63-77.
  23. Nowacki K., Grabowska S. and Lakomy K. (2020). Activities of employers and OHS services during the developing COVID-19 epidemic in Poland. Safety Science, 131, 104935.
  24. Peace C., Lamm F., Dearsly G. and Parkes H. (2019). The evolution of the OHS profession in New Zealand. Safety Science, 120: 254-262.
  25. Pelton J., Jakhu R. (2020). Space safety regulations and standards. Amsterdam: North Holland.
  26. Raposo V.L. (2023). Eugenics in Europe – the history of development and reasons for abandoning the doctrine of human selection on the European continent. European Chronicle, 8(1): 5-15.
  27. Rose K. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic. London: Academic Press.
  28. Roughton J., Crutchfield N. and Waite M. (2019). Safety culture. London: Academic Press.
  29. Seredyuk V. (2022). Interpretation of euthanasia in conditions of conflict of bioethical principles. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 12(1): 68-76.
  30. Shahini E., Misiuk M., Zakhodym M., Borkovska V. and Koval N. (2023). Analysis of the economic efficiency of growing pigs for meat and its improvement. Scientific Horizons, 26(6): 110-120.
  31. Shebanina O., Burkovska A., Lunkina T. and Burkovska A. (2022). The aspects of food security formation in the context of epidemiological restrictions in the USA. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 26(1): 19-29.
  32. Sun M., Liang Q., Ma Y., Wang F., Lin L., Li T., Sun Z. and Duan J. (2020). Particulate matter exposure and biomarkers associated with blood coagulation: A meta-analysis. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 206, 111417.
  33. Svitlychnyi O. (2022). Counterfeit and falsified medicines: Today’s challenges and smart solutions. Law. Human. Environment, 13(3): 59-64.
  34. Terkenli T.S., Goulimaris D. and Latinopoulos D. (2022). The Competition for Demand for Tourism Products in the Mediterranean Region of the European Union in the Context of Coronavirus Infection (2020-2021). European Chronicle, 7(4): 14-22.
  35. Torres L.D., Jain A. (2017). Employer’s civil liability for work-related accidents: A comparison of non-economic loss in Chile and England. Safety Science, 94: 197- 207.
  36. Uvarova O. (2020). Business and human rights in times of global emergencies: A comparative perspective. Comparative Law Review, 26: 199-224.
  37. Vovk М. and Yurkevych Y. (2022). Legal status of the business entities in Ukraine in the context of changes in current legislation. Law Journal of the National Academy of Internal Affairs, 12(2): 9-15.
  38. Yaroshenko O.M., Steshenko V.M., Anisimova H.V., Yakovleva G.O. and Nabrusko M.S. (2021). The impact of the European court of human rights on the development of rights in health care. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare. DOI: 10.1108/IJHRH-03-2021-0078
  39. Yaroshenko O.M., Vapnyarchuk N.M., Lozovoi S.V., Yakovleva G.O. and Yakovlyev O.A. (2018). General-compulsory medical insurance: World experience. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(5): 1829- 1838.
  40. Zhuravlova L., Lytvynchuk A., Mozharovska T. and Bedny I. (2022). Environmental Sustainability and Perception of Safety of Vaccine in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Scientific Horizons, 25(4): 67-74.

Gulnar Aigarinova, Maksat Yelikbai, Saltanat Beisebaeva, Auyelkhan Sabirov, Adema Suttibayeva, Problems of legal provision of sanitary and epidemiological sustainability and well-being of the population in the context of modern challenges in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 1 T./2023, pp 29-45, DOI: 10.3280/RISS2023-001-S1003