Historical learning processes of primary school children in museum collections: Results of an Italian-German research project

Journal title EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY
Author/s Sandra Chistolini, Bernd Wagner
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2025/1
Language English Pages 18 P. 132-149 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/ess1-2025oa20283
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Dealing with multiple crises and unavoidable disasters is a current educational challenge because children are affected by environmental and climate change and economic uncertainties in the long term. Crisis-related content is usually addressed in the context of social science education in schools. In Germany, the cross-disciplinary tasks of civic education and education for sustainable development as well as multi-perspectivity in science lessons are relevant (Pech, 2009), while in Italy active citizenship is more stressed (Corradini, 2019). It remains questionable whether institutional teaching contents contribute to overcoming crises, or whether they are rather linked to social reassurance measures that conceal the fact that little is being done to change the causes. This article addresses the fact that actively dealing with crises and unavoidable disasters requires visions for the future. These can be developed in the context of historical factual learning, in which historical change is made tangible. The article presents an empirically based pedagogical approach about how these visions of the future can be developed with children and their interaction with collection objects.

Keywords: ; pedagogical anthropology; didactics of material culture; historical-political factual learning processes; ideas of the future; intergenerational mediation

  1. Barthes R. (1985). The language of fashion. Frankfurt, Main: Suhrkamp.
  2. Benjamin W. (2020). On the concept of history. Newly edited edition, Norderstedt: OFD.
  3. Chistolini S. (2013). Solidarity and active citizenship learned from a natural disaster: the school experience after the May 2012 earthquake in Italy. In: Cunningham P. and Kamara A., editors, Identities and citizenship education: controversy, crisis and challenges. Lisbon: CiCe Institute for Policy Studies in Education. London Metropolitan University.
  4. Chistolini S. (2015). Kindererziehung nach Giuseppina Pizzigoni. Gegenspielerin Maria Montessoris und Begründerin einer femininen Pädagogik. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
  5. Chistolini S. (2021). The Pizzigoni Experimental Method in Sara Bertuzzi’s Diaries. Fundaments of Childhood Education. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  6. Clifford J. (1997). Routes: travel and translation in the late twentieth century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  7. Corradini L., Mari G. (2019). Educazione alla cittadinanza e insegnamento della Costituzione. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  8. Dixson-Declève S., Gaffney O., Ghosh J., Randers J., Rockström J., Stoknes P. E., Hrsg. (2022). Earth for All. A Survival Guide for Humanity. Club of Rome. New Society Publishers: Gabriola Island.
  9. Duncker L., Kremling C. (2010). Collecting as a form of early childhood world appropriation - explorative observations and interviews with preschool children. In: Fischer H.-J., Gansen P., Michalik K., editors, Sachunterricht und frühe Bildung. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
  10. GDSU Gesellschaft für Didaktik des Sachunterrichts, editor (2013) Perspektivrahmen Sachunterricht. Completely revised and expanded edition. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
  11. German UNESCO Commission (2023). Intangible Cultural Heritage in Germany, -- text available at the website https://www.unesco.de/orte/immaterielles-kulturerbe/.
  12. Götz G. (2018). History teaching as criticism? The dispute about critical history didactics and its consequences. Journal for Didactics of the Social Sciences, 9: 61-78.
  13. Hahn H. P. (2016). The invisibility of things. On two perspectives on material culture in the humanities. In: Kalthoff H., Cress T., Röhl T., editors, Materiality. Challenges for Social and Cultural Sciences. Paderborn: Fink.
  14. Hahn H. P. (2020). The stubbornness of things – Introduction. In: Ders, editor, On the stubbornness of things. For a new perspective on the material world. 5th edition. Berlin: Neofelis.
  15. Heinzel F. (2011). Intergenerational mediation in primary school. The end of child-centredness. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.
  16. Keidel K., Wagner B., Zehbe K-Chr. (2023a-h.). Videography [Unpublished video data]. Leipzig: University of Leipzig.
  17. König P., Wagner B. (2023). Educational potentials of material culture in learning processes. Widerstreit Sachunterricht, 27. DOI: 10.25673/101598.
  18. Krösche H. (2020). The importance of things of material culture for early historical learning. In: Barsch S. and van Norden J., editors, Historical learning and material culture. Of things and objects in historical didactics. Bielefeld: Transcript.
  19. Pandel H.-J. (1987). Dimensions of historical consciousness. An attempt to make its structure discussable for empiricism and pragmatics. History Didactics. Problems, Projects, Perspectives, 2: 130-142.
  20. Pech D. (2009). Sachunterricht - didactics and discipline. Approaches to an understanding of subject learning in the context of the development of subject teaching and its didactics. Widerstreit Sachunterricht, 13. DOI: 10.25673/92413.
  21. Pech D., Rauterberg M. (2013). It depends on the handling. “Ways of dealing” as a starting point for structuring subject teaching. Widerstreit Sachunterricht, 5th supplement. 2nd edition. DOI: 10.25673/92556.
  22. Pratt M. L. (1999). Arts of the Contact Zone. In: Bartholomae D. and Petroksky A., editors, Ways of Reading. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
  23. Schede F., Dietze H. (1926). Gymnastics in the classroom. Combating sitting injuries at school. Leipzig: Quelle and Meyer.
  24. Star S., Griesemer J. (1989). Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 4: 387-420, -- text available at the website https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001.
  25. Strauss A. L., Corbin J. M. (1996). Grounded Theory: Fundamentals of Qualitative Social Research. Weinheim: Beltz.
  26. Von Reeken D. (2018). Materiall sources in the classroom – criminally ignored and underestimated? Learning from history, -- text available at the website http://lernen-aus-der-geschichte.de/Lernen-und-Lehren/content/13863.
  27. Wagner B. (2010). Contact zones in the museum. Children’s groups in the exhibition North American Indians. Paragrana, 2: 192-203.
  28. Wagner B. (2021). Cultural education in museums: Language action in learning environments for collection objects. In: Scheunpflug A., Wulf C., Züchner I., editors, Cultural education. Edition ZfE 12., Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
  29. Wagner B. (2025). Affordance and stubbornness in material culture learning processes. In: Nießeler A., Wagner B., Zehbe K.-Chr., editors, Pedagogy of material culture. Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.

Sandra Chistolini, Bernd Wagner, Historical learning processes of primary school children in museum collections: Results of an Italian-German research project in "EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY" 1/2025, pp 132-149, DOI: 10.3280/ess1-2025oa20283