The relationship between sounds and cities: evaluation of sound quality in the urban environment

Journal title RIVISTA ITALIANA DI ACUSTICA
Author/s Giulia Valentini, Samantha Di Loreto, Massimo Angrilli, Sergio Montelpare
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2025/1
Language Italian Pages 11 P. 59-69 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/ria1-2025oa19446
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This study analyzes the soundscape of the university district in Pescara, an urban area characterized by high-density activities and services. The research combines quantitative analysis of the acoustic environment with qualitative assessments of sound perception, focusing on four strategic areas: the Viale Pindaro university campus, the Via Falcone e Borsellino corridor, Piazza Ettore Troilo, and the former Di Cocco Barracks Park. Through acoustic measurements and user perception surveys, the study highlighted the complexity of the urban soundscape and its influence on quality of life. Special attention was given to the redevelopment project of the green corridor connecting the courthouse to the university, analysing its impact on acoustic comfort. The results suggest that integrating soundscape planning into urban design can significantly improve the experience of public spaces, providing practical guidelines for future sustainable urban development strategies.

Keywords: ; Sound landscape; Urban acoustic environment; Urban planning; Sound perception; Acoustic quality; Urban regeneration

  1. A. Radicchi, P. Cevikayak Yelmi, A. Chung, P. Jor-dan, S. Stewart, A. Tsaligopoulos, L. McCunn, M. Grant, Sound and the healthy city, Cities and Health 5 (2021) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2020.1821980.
  2. A. Tsaligopoulos, Y.G. Matsinos, Approaching Qui-etness as an Urban Sustainability Opportunity, Environments - MDPI 9 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/environments9020012.
  3. F. D’Alessandro, L. Evangelisti, C. Guattari, G. Gra-zieschi, F. Orsini, Influence of visual aspects and other fea-tures on the soundscape assessment of a university external area, Building Acoustics 25 (2018) 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X18778759.
  4. J. Liu, J. Kang, H. Behm, T. Luo, Effects of land-scape on soundscape perception: Soundwalks in city parks, Landscape and Urban Planning 123 (2014) 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.12.003.
  5. R.M. Rehan, The phonic identity of the city urban soundscape for sustainable spaces, HBRC Journal 12 (2016) 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.12.005.
  6. H. Booi, F. van den Berg, Quiet areas and the need for quietness in Amsterdam, International Journal of Envi-ronmental Research and Public Health 9 (2012) 1030–1050. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9041030.
  7. K. Vogiatzis, N. Rémy, Changing the urban sound environment in greece: a guide based on selected case stud-ies of strategic noise maps (Snm) and noise action plans (nap) in medium and large urban areas, Environments - MDPI 5 (2018) 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments5060064.
  8. J. Liu, Y. Wang, C. Zimmer, J. Kang, T. Yu, Factors associated with soundscape experiences in urban green spaces: A case study in Rostock, Germany, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 37 (2019) 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.11.003.
  9. A. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, E. Öhrström, Attractive “quiet” courtyards: A potential modifier of urban residents’ responses to road traffic noise?, International Journal of En-vironmental Research and Public Health 7 (2010) 3359–3375. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7093359.
  10. Murray Schafer R., The new soundscape, 1969.
  11. L. Cassina, L. Fredianelli, I. Menichini, C. Chiari, G. Licitra, Audio-visual preferences and tranquillity ratings in urban areas, Environments - MDPI 5 (2018) 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments5010001.
  12. F. Aletta, T. Oberman, A. Mitchell, H. Tong, J. Kang, Assessing the changing urban sound environment dur-ing the COVID-19 lockdown period using short-term acoustic measurements, Noise Mapping 7 (2020) 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2020-0011.
  13. M. Erfanian, A.J. Mitchell, J. Kang, F. Aletta, The Psychophysiological Implications of Soundscape: A System-atic Review of Empirical Literature and a Research Agenda, IJERPH 16 (2019) 3533. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193533.
  14. Adams M.,. Bruce, N.,. Davies, W.,. Cain, W.,. Jen-nings, P.,. Carlyle, P.,. Cusack, P.,. Hume, K.,. Plack, C., SOUNDWALKING AS METHODOLOGY FOR UNDERSTAND-ING SOUNDSCAPES, Acoustics Research Centre, University of Salford, Salford, UK 30 (2008) 131–35.
  15. Legge quadro sull’inquinamento acustico, 1995.
  16. DPCM14 novembre 1997-Determinazione dei valori limite delle sorgenti sonore., 1997.
  17. G. Cerwén, F. Mossberg, Implementation of quiet areas in Sweden, International Journal of Environmental Re-search and Public Health 16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010134.
  18. Z. Allam, S.E. Bibri, D. Chabaud, C. Moreno, The ‘15-Minute City’concept can shape a net-zero urban future, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 9 (2022) 1–5.
  19. S. Di Loreto, F. Serpilli, V. Lori, Soundscape Ap-proach in the Seaport of Ancona: A Case Study, Acoustics 4 (2022) 492–516. https://doi.org/10.3390/acoustics4020031.
  20. J.-Y. Hong, K.H. Chong, Designing Public Sound-scapes through Social Architecture and Soundscape Ap-proaches: Reflective Review of Architectural Design Studio, Sustainability 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612399.
  21. Y. Hasegawa, S.-K. Lau, C.K. Chau, Potential mutual efforts of landscape factors to improve residential sound-scapes in compact urban cities, Landscape and Urban Plan-ning 227 (2022) 104534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104534.
  22. International standard ISO, Acoustics — Sound-scape — Part 1: Definition and conceptual framework, Inter-national Organization for Standardization, 2014. https://www.iso.org/standard/52161.html.
  23. International standard ISO, Acoustics — Sound-scape — Part 2: Data collection and reporting requirements, International Organization for Standardization, 2018. https://www.iso.org/standard/75267.html.
  24. Q. Liang, S. Lin, L. Wang, F. Yang, Y. Yang, The Im-pact of Campus Soundscape on Enhancing Student Emotion-al Well-Being: A Case Study of Fuzhou University, Buildings 15 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15010079.
  25. X. Lu, G. Li, X. Song, L. Zhou, G. Lv, Concept, Framework, and Data Model for Geographical Soundscapes, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 14 (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi14010036.
  26. R.M. Alsina-Pagès, G.J. Ginovart-Panisello, M. Freixes, A. Radicchi, A soundwalk in the heart of poblenou superblock in barcelona: Preliminary study of the acoustic events, Noise Mapping 8 (2021) 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2021-0016.

Giulia Valentini, Samantha Di Loreto, Massimo Angrilli, Sergio Montelpare, Il rapporto tra i suoni e la città: valutazione della qualità sonora in ambito urbano in "RIVISTA ITALIANA DI ACUSTICA" 1/2025, pp 59-69, DOI: 10.3280/ria1-2025oa19446