Time-Space Patterns in Work and Organizing: Setting the Scene, Taking Stock and Moving Forward

Journal title STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
Author/s Sonia Bertolini, Anna Carreri, Dawn Lyon, Lia Tirabeni
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2025/2
Language English Pages 24 P. 7-30 File size 194 KB
DOI 10.3280/SO2025-002001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In the face of an increasing variety of spatio-temporal patterns of work and organisations, we seek to draw attention to time and space in this issue. In our introduction, we argue that they have become constitutive of the ongoing transformations of work in its entanglements with social reproduction, and of the evolving nature of organisations themselves – practices, structures, and organisational cultures. After presenting the framework underpinning this special issue and providing an overview of the contributions it comprises – five articles, three invited contributions from leading international scholars and two book reviews – we propose our own analysis of four interrelated tensions that run through the contributions to the special issue. These tensions concern the autonomy–control dialectic, the ambivalent role of technologies, subjectivities and the reconfiguration of agency, and the work–life tensions that unfold across spatio-temporal arrangements. We highlight how each tension simultaneously shapes and is shaped by contemporary spatio-temporal patterns of work and organisation. Finally, we outline possible avenues for future research that may foster novel theoretical and methodological frameworks capable of better grasping the ongoing metamorphoses of work, organisation, space, and temporality, along with the key tensions that underpin them.

Keywords: Control; New ways of working; Subjectivity; Technology; Time-space patterns; Work–life dynamics

  1. Adam B. (1998). Timescapes of Modernity, The Environment and Invisible Hazards. London: Routledge.
  2. Albano R., Bertolini S., Curzi Y., Fabbri T. M., Parisi T. (2017). “DigitAgile: l’ufficio nel dispositivo mobile. Opportunità e rischi per lavoratori e aziende”, Osservatorio sul Mutamento Sociale e l’Innovazione Culturale, 3, WP Series, Torino, Dipartimento CPS.
  3. Albano R., Curzi Y., Parisi T., Tirabeni L. (2018). “Perceived autonomy and discretion of mobile workers”, Studi Organizzativi, 2: 31–61. DOI: 10.3280/SO2018-002002
  4. Alberti G., Sacchetto D., Vianello F.A. (2017). “Spazio e tempo nei processi produttivi e riproduttivi”, Sociologia del lavoro, 146: 7-23. DOI: 10.3280/SL2017-146001
  5. Aroles J., Granter E., de Vaujany F. X. (2020). “‘Becoming mainstream’: the professionalisation and corporatisation of digital nomadism”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(1): 114-129.
  6. Aroles J., Leclercq-Vandelannoitte A., Hassard J., Foster W. M., Granter E. (2025). “Won’t Get Fooled Again? Theorizing Discursive Constructions of Novelty in the ‘New’ World of Work”, Work, Employment and Society, 39(4): 882-903. DOI: 10.1177/09500170241300948.
  7. Azaïs C. (2019). Hybridation. In: Bureau M-C., Corsani A., Giraud O., Rey F. (Ed.), Les Zones grises des relations de travail et d’emploi: un dictionnaire sociologique. Buenos Aires: Teseo.
  8. Bailey C., Suddaby R. (2023). “When time falls apart: Re-centring human time in organisations through the lived experience of waiting”, Organization Studies, 44(7): 1033-1053. DOI: 10.1177/01708406231166807.
  9. Bastian M., Baraitser L., Flexer M. J., Hom A. R., Salisbury L. (2020). “Introduction: The Social Life of Time”, Time and Society, 29(2): 289–96. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X20921674
  10. Bertolini S., Fullin G., Pacetti V. (2022). “Il lavoro da remoto tra terziarizzazione, digitalizzazione e trasformazioni delle relazioni di impiego”, Meridiana, 104: 9-28.
  11. Bertolini S., Vercelli M., (2024). “Work (re)-organization in the companies at the time of COVID-19: remote working and the hybridisation of work relations”, Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 1: 127-152. DOI: 10.1423/109017
  12. Beyes T., Holt R. (2020). “The topographical imagination: Space and organization theory”, Organization Theory, 1(2): 1-26. DOI: 10.1177/2631787720913880.
  13. Bloom P. (2016). “Work as the contemporary limit of life: Capitalism, the death drive, and the lethal fantasy of ‘work–life balance”, Organization, 23(4): 588–606. DOI: 10.1177/1350508415596604
  14. Butera F. (2020). “Valorizzare il lavoro attraverso la progettazione partecipata”, Studi Organizzativi, suppl. 1/2020: 156-178.  DOI: 10.3280/SO2020-001-S1010
  15. Carabelli G., Lyon D. (2025). “Time with houseplants: A sociological analysis of temporalities, affective entanglements and practices of care”, The Sociological Review 0(0). DOI: 10.1177/00380261251335747.
  16. Carreri A. (2025). Hybrid Ways of Working in the Digital Era in Italy: Key Questions for Moving Forward. In: Pulcher S., Basaglia S., Cuomo S., Simonella Z. (Ed.), Diversity and Inclusion in Italy: Societal and Organizational Perspectives. Cham: Springer.
  17. Carreri A., Dordoni A., Poggio B. (2022). Work-life balance and beyond: premises and challenges. In: Bertolini S., Poggio B. (Ed.), Research Handbook on Work-Life Balance. USA-UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  18. Carreri A., Gosetti G., Mattei A. (2024). “Il "caso" Lamborghini: contrattazione continua e tempi di lavoro”, Lavoro e Diritto, 4: 663-689. DOI: 10.1441/115069.
  19. Carreri A., Gosetti G., Poggio B., Zanoni P. (2020). “Lavoro e digitalizzazione: soggettività, controllo e qualità del lavoro nella quarta rivoluzione industriale”, Sociologia del lavoro, 158: 51-73. DOI: 10.3280/SL2020-15800
  20. Chung H. (2022). The flexibility paradox: Why flexible working leads to (self)exploitation. Bristol: Policy Press.
  21. Dafoe A. (2015). “On technological determinism: A typology, scope conditions, and a mechanism”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(6): 1047-1076.
  22. Dale K., Burrell G. (2014). “Being Occupied: An Embodied Re-reading of Organizational ‘Wellness’’’, Organization 21(2): 159–77. DOI: 10.1177/1350508412473865
  23. Dawson P. (2014). “Temporal practices: time and ethnographic research in changing organizations”, Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 3 (2): 130–151. DOI: 10.1108/JOE-05-2012-0025
  24. de Laat K. (2023). “Remote work and post-bureaucracy: Unintended consequences of work design for gender inequality”, ILR Review, 76(1): 135–159. DOI: 10.1177/00197939221076134.
  25. De Molli F. (2019). “An aesthetic account of space: A report on recent developments in organizational research”, Studi Organizzativi, 1: 38-63. DOI: 10.3280/SO2019-001002
  26. de Vaujany F., Holt R., Grandazzi A. (Ed.) (2023). Organization as Time: Technology, Power and Politics. Cambridge: University Press.
  27. de Vaujany F.-X., Leclercq-Vandelannoitte A., Munro I., Nama Y., Holt R. (2021). “Control and surveillance in work practice: Cultivating paradox in ‘new’ modes of organizing”, Organization Studies, 42(5): 675–695. DOI: 10.1177/01708406211010988.
  28. Doria S. (2021). “Trust, but Verify: Power Relations and Control Practices in a Smart Working Environment”, Studi Organizzativi, 1: 27-50. DOI: 10.3280/SO2021-001002
  29. Edensor T. (Ed.) (2010). Geographies of Rhythm. Farnham: Ashgate.
  30. Felstead A. (2022). Remote Working, A Research Overview. London: Routledge.
  31. Flaherty M.G, Meinert L., Dalsgård A.L. (Ed.) (2020). Time Work: Studies of Temporal Agency. Oxford: Berghahn.
  32. Fleming P., Spicer A. (2004). “You Can Check Out Any Time You Want, But You Can Never Leave: Spatial Boundaries in a High Commitment Organization”, Human Relations, 57(1): 75–94. DOI: 10.1177/0018726704042715
  33. Fogarty H., Scott P., Williams S. (2011). “The half-empty office: Dilemmas in managing locational flexibility”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 26 (3): 183-195.
  34. Fullin G., Pacetti V., (2020). Il lavoro da casa durante l’emergenza. Tecnologie, relazioni, controllo. In: Cigno L. (Ed.), Forza lavoro! Ripensare il lavoro ai tempi della pandemia. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  35. Gibson J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In: Shaw R., Bransford J. (Ed.), Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. New York: Routledge.
  36. Goglio V., Pacetti V. (2022). “Tecnologia e controllo nel lavoro da remoto: digitalizzazione, emergenza e cambiamento organizzativo”, Meridiana, 104: 47-73.
  37. Gold M., Mustafa M. (2013). ‘‘’Work Always Wins’: Client Colonisation, Time Management and the Anxieties of Connected Freelancers”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 28(3): 197–211.
  38. Gubitta P. (2018). “I lavori ibridi e la gestione del lavoro”, Economia e Società Regionale, 1(1):70-82. DOI: 10.3280/ES2018-001006
  39. Halford S. (2005). “Hybrid Workspace: Re-spatialisations of Work, Organisation and Management”, New Technology, Work and Employment 20(1): 19–33.
  40. Hochschild A. (1998). The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
  41. Hughes K.D., Silver, W.A. (2020). “Beyond time-binds: Rethinking work–family dynamics for a mobile world”, Human Relations, 73(7): 924–952. DOI: 10.1177/0018726719846264.
  42. Izak M., Shortt H., Case P. (2022). “Learning to inhabit the liquid liminal world of work: An auto-ethnographic visual study of work-life boundary transitions”, Management Learning, 54(2): 198-222. DOI: 10.1177/13505076211070359
  43. Jammaers E., De Coster M. Klinksiek I., van Amsterdam N. (2025). “Compassion, remote work and vulnerability: the case of employees with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic”, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal. DOI: 10.1108/EDI-10-2024-0500.
  44. Johnsen C.G., Sørensen, B.M. (2014). “‘It’s capitalism on coke!’: From temporary to permanent liminality in organization studies”, Culture and Organization, 21(4): 321–337. DOI: 10.1080/14759551.2014.901326.
  45. Kelliher C., Anderson D. (2010). “Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work”, Human Relations, 63(1): 83–106. DOI: 10.1177/0018726709349199
  46. Kurland N.B., Egan T.D. (1999). “Telecommuting: Justice and Control in the Virtual Organization”, Organization Science, 10(4): 500–513.
  47. Lautsch B.A., Kossek E.E., Eaton S.C. (2009). “Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation”, Human Relations, 62(6): 795-827. DOI: 10.1177/0018726709104543
  48. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte A. (2021). “The new paternalism? The workplace as a place to work—and to live”, Organization, 28(6): 949-975. DOI: 10.1177/13505084211015374
  49. Lee H., Sawyer S. (2010). “Conceptualizing time, space and computing for work and organizing”, Time & Society, 19(3): 293-317. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X10354429.
  50. Lefebvre H. (2004[1992]). Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life. London: Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.
  51. Lefebvre H. (2014[1947, 1961, 1981]). Critique of Everyday Life. London and New York: Verso.
  52. Leonardi P.M., Jackson, M.H. (2004). “Technological determinism and discursive closure in organizational mergers”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17(6): 615-631. DOI: 10.1108/09534810410564587
  53. Limburg D., Jackson P.J. (2007). “Teleworkflow: supporting remote control with Workflow Management Systems”, New Technology, Work and Employment, 22(2): 146-167.
  54. Lyon D. (2016). “Doing Audio-Visual Montage to Explore Time and Space: The Everyday Rhythms of Billingsgate Fish Market”, Sociological Research Online, 21(3): 57-68.
  55. Lyon D. (2020). Place-making at work: the role of rhythm in the production of 'thick' places. In: Edensor T., Kothari U., Kalindides A. (Ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Place. Abingdon: Routledge.
  56. Lyon, D. (Ed) (2022). Rhythmanalysis: Rhythmanalysis: Place, Mobility, Disruption and Performance. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
  57. Mayo M., Pastor J.C., Gomez-Mejia L., Cruz C. (2009). “Why some firms adopt telecommuting while others do not: A contingency perspective”, Human Resource Management, 48 (6): 917-939.
  58. Marchetti S., Cherubini D., Garofalo Geymont G. (2021). Global Domestic Workers. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
  59. Miele F., Tirabeni L. (2020). “Digital technologies and power dynamics in the organization: A conceptual review of remote working and wearable technologies at work”, Sociology Compass, 14(6), e12795.
  60. Morosanu R., Ringel F. (2016). “Time-Tricking, A General Introduction”, The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 34(1): 17–21.
  61. Moschera L., Pezzillo Iacono M., Lo Nigro G., Parolin L.L. (2018). “Rethinking Work: Pathways and Practices in Business and Society. Introduction to the Special Issue”, Studi organizzativi, 2: 9-27. DOI: 10.3280/SO2018-002001
  62. Murgia A., Bozzon R., Digennaro P., Mezihorák P., Mondon-Navazo M., Borghi P. (2020). “Hybrid areas of work between employment and self-employment: Emerging challenges and future research directions”, Frontiers in Sociology, 4:86.
  63. Nash L. (2022). The Lived Experience of Work and City Rhythms: A Rhythmanalysis of London's Square Mile. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
  64. Orlikowski W. J. (2007). “Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work”, Organization studies, 28(9): 1435-1448. DOI: 10.1177/0170840607081138.
  65. Orlikowski W. J., Scott S.V. (2008). “10 sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization”, Academy of Management annals, 2(1): 433-474. DOI: 10.1080/19416520802211644
  66. Parkes D., Thrift N. (1979). “Time Spacemakers and Entrainment”, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 4(3): 353–372. DOI: 10.2307/622056
  67. Paton K., Jackson E. (2025). “Introduction to Live Methods Revisited: The roots and conjuncture of Live Methods”, The Sociological Review, 73(5): 941-952. DOI: 10.1177/00380261251335432
  68. Pedersen M., Muhr S.L., Dunne S. (2024). “The Care of the Self and the Meaningful Four-Day Workweek”, Philosophy of Management, 23: 335–352.
  69. Perlow L. (1998). “Boundary Control: The Social Ordering of Work and Family Time in a High-Tech Corporation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(2): 328–57. DOI: 10.2307/2393855.
  70. Pink S. (2020). Doing visual ethnography. London: Sage.
  71. Plesner U., Husted E. (2019). Digital organizing: Revisiting themes in organization studies. Dublin: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  72. Ponzellini A.M. (2023). Lavoro, Tecnologia e Libertà. Tempo e spazio del lavoro nell’era dell’intelligenza artificiale. Milano: Guerini Next.
  73. Ponzellini A.M. (2024). “La ripresa delle politiche di riduzione dell’orario di lavoro. Qualità della vita, produttività e nuove forme di ricompensa”, Economia e società regionale, 3: 27-45. DOI: 10.3280/ES2024-003003
  74. Puranam P. (2018). The Microstructure of Organizations. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  75. Ratner H. (2020). “Topologies of organization: Space in continuous deformation”, Organization Studies, 41(11): 1513–1530. DOI: 10.1177/0170840619874464.
  76. Riach K., Warren S. (2014). “Smell organization: Bodies and corporeal porosity in office work”, Human Relations, 68(5): 789-809. DOI: 10.1177/0018726714545387
  77. Ropo A., De Paoli D., Salovaara P., Sauer E. (2015). Why does space need to be taken seriously in leadership and organization studies and practice? In: Ropo A., Salovaara P., Sauer E., De Paoli D. (Ed.) Leadership in spaces and places. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  78. Rose G. (2023, 5th edition). Visual Methodologies. London: Sage.
  79. Schreven S., Holck L., Dobusch L., Van Laer K., Islam G. (2023). “Toward a Critical Study of Boundaries in and around Organizations”, call for paper, Gender, Work and Organization.
  80. Schreyögg G., Sydow J. (2010). “Crossroads – organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms”, Organization Science, 21(6): 1251-1262.
  81. Segarra P., Longman R. (2025). “Editorial: Crafting a contribution: working with qualitative research across different formats”, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 20(1): 1–7. DOI: 10.1108/QROM-03-2025-007
  82. Sewell G., Taskin L. (2015). “Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework”, Organization studies, 36(11): 1507-1529. DOI: 10.1177/017084061559358
  83. Sharma S. (2014). In the Meantime: Temporality and Cultural Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
  84. Sheller M. (2017). “From spatial turn to mobile turn”, Current Sociology, 65(4): 623–639. DOI: 10.1177/0011392117697463.
  85. Snyder B. H. (2019). The Experience of Time in Organizations. In Brekhus W.H, Ignatow G. (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  86. Sorrentino M., Tirabeni L., Toraldo M. L. (2022). “Reintroducing technology to the coworking debate: prospects and problematics”, Studi Organizzativi, 2: 70-94. DOI: 10.3280/SO2022-002003
  87. Suchman L.A. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  88. Storti L., Dagnes J. (2025). “Escape from Work? Distinctions within the Realm of Anti-Work”, Sociologia del lavoro, 171(1): 9-32. DOI: 10.3280/SL2025-171001.
  89. Tirabeni L. (2024). “Bounded Well-Being: Designing Technologies for Workers’ Well-Being in Corporate Programmes”, Work, Employment and Society, 38(6): 1506-1527. DOI: 10.1177/09500170231203113.
  90. Tyler M., Cohen L. (2010). “Spaces that Matter: Gender Performativity and Organizational Space”, Organization Studies, 31(2): 175-198. DOI: 10.1177/0170840609357381.
  91. Vassiley A., Shafaei A., Nejati M., Onnis L., Bentley T. (2025). “The autonomy paradox, working from home and psychosocial hazards”, Journal of Industrial Relations, 67(2): 356-385. DOI: 10.1177/00221856251315859
  92. Wajcman J. (2014). Pressed for Time, The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  93. Watson D., Wallace J., Land C., Patey J. (2023). “Re-organising wellbeing: Contexts, critiques and contestations of dominant wellbeing narratives”, Organization, 30(3): 441-452. DOI: 10.1177/13505084231156267.
  94. Woodward S. (2019). Material Methods. London: Sage.
  95. Woodward S., Shortt H., Khoo S. (2025). “Cultivating connections, disrupting boundaries: introducing the Journal of Creative Research Methods”, Journal of Creative Research Methods, 1(1): 2-17. DOI: 10.1332/30502969Y2025D000000010

Sonia Bertolini, Anna Carreri, Dawn Lyon, Lia Tirabeni, Time-Space Patterns in Work and Organizing: Setting the Scene, Taking Stock and Moving Forward in "STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI " 2/2025, pp 7-30, DOI: 10.3280/SO2025-002001