The “Control Paradox” in High-Crime Environments: Empirical Evidence from a Large-Scale Analysis on Italian SMEs

Journal title MANAGEMENT CONTROL
Author/s Salvatore Loprevite, Roberto Mavilla, Marco Spadaro
Publishing Year 2026 Issue 2026/1
Language English Pages 30 P. 167-196 File size 276 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2026-001008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This study examines a “control paradox” through the lens of institutionalized agency theory: under severe institutional decay, firms may rationally weaken, rather than strengthen, governance as a strategic adaptation. Using firm-level data on 13,084 Italian SMEs matched with a provincial organized crime index, we run robust regressions linking criminal exposure to a composite measure of the size of SMEs’ two key internal boards (Board of Directors and Board of Statutory Auditors). We find that higher organized crime intensity is associated with smaller administrative and control boards, even after accounting for firm and environmental determinants. Our findings contribute to theory by demonstrating the boundary conditions of traditional agency and risk-based governance models, showing how institutional decay systematically reshapes agents’ incentives and thereby the role of internal governance as an adaptive, agentic response.

Keywords: Organized Crime, Internal Control Systems, Corporate Governance, Control paradox, Institutionalized Agency Theory, Italian SMEs

  1. Aguilera, R. V., Jackson, G. (2003), The Cross-National Diversity of Corporate Governance: Dimensions and Determinants, Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 447-465.
  2. Agus Budiyanto, R. S., Hudiwinarsih, G. (2016), The effect of corporate governance and firm size on company’s financial performance, The Indonesian Accounting Review, 5(1), 63-76.
  3. Ahrens, F. K., Veltrop, D. B., Mulder, L. B., Rink, F. (2025), Board Size in Context: A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Board Size and Firm Performance, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 0, 1-20.
  4. Airoldi, G., Brunetti, G., Coda, V. (1994). Economia aziendale, Bologna, il Mulino.
  5. Ajala, T. O., Ololade, B. M., Olaleye, J. O., Abass, K. B. (2023), Internal control systems and organizational performance in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Nigeria, African Journal of Business Management, 17(4), 65-73. DOI: 10.5897/AJBM2023.9445
  6. Alessandri, A., Fiandaca, G., Masciandaro, D., Vigna, P. L. (2008), Business, Finance and Organized Crime: Proposing a Risk-Based Approach for Governance in a Law and Economics Perspective (the’Vigna Code’), Paolo Baffi Centre Research Paper, (2008-26).
  7. Assunção, R. R., Luca, M. M. M. D., Vasconcelos, A. C. D. (2017), Complexity and corporate governance: an analysis of companies listed on the BM&FBOVESPA. Revista Contabilidade & Finanças, 28(74), 213-228.
  8. Bennett, R. J., Robson, P. J. A. (2004), The role of boards of directors in small and medium-sized firms, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(1), 95-113. DOI: 10.1108/14626000410519137
  9. Bianchi, P. A., Marra, A., Masciandaro, D., Pecchiari, N. (2022), Organized crime and firms’ financial statements: Evidence from criminal investigations in Italy, The Accounting Review, 97(3), 77-106. DOI: 10.2308/TAR-2019-0079
  10. Boone, A. L., Casares Field, L., Karpoff, J. M., Raheja, C. G. (2007), The determinants of corporate board size and composition: An empirical analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 85(1), 66-101.
  11. Buchetti, B., Fabrizi, M., Ipino, E., Miquel-Flores, I., Parbonetti, A. (2025), Organized crime and banks: assessing the effects of anti-mafia police actions on lending, ECB Working Paper No. 2025/3060.
  12. Calamunci, F., Drago, F. (2020), The Economic Impact of Organized Crime Infiltration in the Legal Economy: Evidence from the Judicial Administration of Organized Crime Firms, Italian Economic Journal, 6(2), 275-297.
  13. Certo, S., Trevis, Daily, C. M, Dalton, D. R. (2001), Signaling Firm Value through Board Structure: An Investigation of Initial Public Offerings, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(2), 33-50. DOI: 10.1177/104225870102600202
  14. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Puyenbroeck, T. V., (2007), An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators, Social Indicators Research, 82(1), 111-145.
  15. Lehn, K. M., Patro, S., Zhao, M. (2009), Determinants of the Size and Composition of US Corporate Boards: 1935-2000, Financial Management, 38(4), 747-780.
  16. Li, C., Lim, J. H., Wang, Q. (2007), Internal and external influences on IT control governance, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 8(4), 225-239.
  17. Cincimino, S., La Rosa, F., Paternostro, S. (2025), Corporate Governance, Stakeholder Involvement, and Government Interventions as Corporate Prevention Strategies Against Organized Crime, In H. Y. Somé, N. Boubakri, O. Guedhami (Eds.), Corporate Governance, Organizational Ethics, and Prevention Strategies Against Financial Crime (pp. 407-423), Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-74523-2_19
  18. Coles, J. L., Daniel, N. D., Naveen, L. (2008), Boards: Does one size fit all?, Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 329-356.
  19. Cortesi, A., Tettamanzi, P., Corno, F. (2009), Empirical evidence on internal control systems and corporate governance in Italy, Journal of Management & Governance, 13(1), 75-100.
  20. Dak-Adzaklo, C. S. P., Wong, R. M. K. (2024), Corporate governance reforms, societal trust, and corporate financial policies, Journal of Corporate Finance, 84, 102507, 1-23.
  21. De Simoni, M. (2022), The financial profile of firms infiltrated by organised crime in Italy.
  22. Roma, Banca d’Italia - Unità di Informazione Finanziaria per l’Italia.
  23. Dixit, A. K., Pindyck, R. S. (1994), Investment under uncertainty, Princeton, NJ, Princeton university press. DOI: 10.1515/9781400830176
  24. Fabrizi, M., Malaspina, P., Parbonetti, A. (2017), Caratteristiche e modalità di gestione delle aziende criminali, Rivista di Studi e Ricerche sulla criminalità organizzata, 3(1), 47-66.
  25. Forgione, A. F., Migliardo, C. (2025), The Mafia’s Economic Grip: Firm Efficiency and a Composite Indicator of Organized Crime, Journal of Regional Science, 65(3), 759-779.
  26. Forgione, A. F., Migliardo, C., Mustica, P. (2024), From News to knowledge: Decoding Organized Crime’s Footprint in Italy Through Text mining, Working Paper. --https://sites.google.com/view/mafiaindex/home-page (last accessed 18 September 2025). Fratini, F., Tettamanzi, P. (2015), Corporate governance and performance: Evidence from Italian companies, Open journal of business and management, 3(2), 199-218. DOI: 10.4236/ojbm.2015.32020.
  27. Fusco, E. (2023), Potential improvements approach in composite indicators construction: The Multi-directional Benefit of the Doubt model, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 85.
  28. Gambetta, D. (1996), The Sicilian Mafia: the business of private protection, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
  29. Hall, B. H., Ziedonis, R. H. (2001), The patent paradox revisited: an empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979-1995, rand Journal of Economics, 32(1), 101-128. DOI: 10.2307/2696400
  30. Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., Collins, B. J. (2009), Resource Dependence Theory: A Review, Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404-1427. DOI: 10.1177/0149206309343469
  31. Huang, Q., Yuan, T. (2021), Does Political Corruption Impede Firm Innovation? Evidence from the United States, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(1), 213-248. DOI: 10.1017/S0022109019000966
  32. Ilaboya, O. J., Ohiokha, G., Izevbekhai, M. O. (2016), Determinants of board size and composition: a comparative study of Nigerian and Malaysian quoted companies, Ekonomska misao i praksa, 25(2), 423-444.
  33. Jensen, M. C. (1986), Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers, The American economic review, 76(2), 323-329.
  34. John, K., Litov, L., Yeung, B. (2008), Corporate Governance and Risk-Taking, The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1679-1728.
  35. Jones, M. J., Melis, A. (2021), The Continuity of the Board of Statutory Auditors Across Social, Economic and Political Institutional Changes, European Accounting Review, 30(2), 349-380. DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2020.1761850
  36. Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., Yang, T. (2008), The determinants of board structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 87(2), 308-328.
  37. Llarena, Z. (2022), Organized Corporate Crimes using Model Law Development for Health Regulation and Policy, Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 2(1), 33-46. DOI: 10.37535/105002120234
  38. Mariani, L., Tettamanzi, P., Corno, F. (2010), External Auditing vs Statutory Committee Auditing: The Italian Evidence, International Journal of Auditing, 14(1), 25-40.
  39. Melnychuk, T. (2023), The Concept of Organized Crime as an Institutional Cluster, in T. Melnychuk (Ed.), Organized Crime as Institutional Cluster: Transition from Traditional to Informational Model in Ukraine, (pp. 21-40), Springer Nature Switzerland. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-39532-1_3
  40. Migliardo, C., Nicolò, D. (2025), Mutual Spatial Proximity, Organized Crime, and the Profitability of High-Growth Startups: The Case of Italian Gazelle Enterprises, Management Control, (1), 237-259. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2025-001011
  41. Mirenda, L., Mocetti, S., Rizzica, L. (2022), The Economic Effects of Mafia: Firm Level Evidence, American Economic Review, 112(8), 2748-2773.
  42. Mocetti, S., Rizzica, L. (2024), Organized crime in Italy: An economic analysis, Italian Economic Journal, 10(3), 1339-1360.
  43. Nestor, S. (2004), The impact of changing corporate governance norms on economic crime,
  44. Journal of Financial Crime, 11(4), 347-352. DOI: 10.1108/13590790410809293
  45. Piot, C. (2004), The existence and independence of audit committees in France, Accounting and Business Research, 34(3), 223-246. DOI: 10.1080/00014788.2004.9729966
  46. Porta, R. L., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W. (1998), Law and finance, Journal of political economy, 106(6), 1113-1155. DOI: 10.1086/250042
  47. Raheja, C. G. (2005), Determinants of Board Size and Composition: A Theory of Corporate Boards, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40(2), 283-306. DOI: 10.1017/S0022109000002313
  48. Ravenda, D., Giuranno, M. G., Valencia-Silva, M. M., Argiles-Bosch, J. M., García-Blandón,
  49. J. (2020), The effects of mafia infiltration on public procurement performance, European Journal of Political Economy, 64, 1-23.
  50. Ravenda, D., Valencia-Silva, M. M., Argiles-Bosch, J. M., Garcia-Blandon, J. (2018), Accrual management as an indication of money laundering through legally registered Mafia firms in Italy, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 286-317. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2329
  51. Riccardi, M., Soriani, C., Giampietri, V. (2016), Mafia infiltration in legitimate companies in Italy: From traditional sectors to emerging businesses, in E. Savona, M. Riccardi, G. Berlusconi (Eds.), Organised crime in European businesses (pp. 119-140), Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315640617
  52. Ruiz, C. V. (2016), Literature review of earnings management: Who, why, when, how and what for?, Finnish business review, 11, 1-13.
  53. Saridakis, G., Mohammed, A.-M., Sookram, S. (2015), Does crime affect firm innovation?
  54. Evidence from Trinidad and Tobago, Economics Bulletin, 35(2), 1205-1215.
  55. Seal, W. (2006), Management accounting and corporate governance: An institutional interpretation of the agency problem, Management Accounting Research, 17(4), 389-408.
  56. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W. (1997), A Survey of Corporate Governance, The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
  57. Simamora, A. J. (2022), Crime rate, real earnings management and managerial ability, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(2), 405-423. DOI: 10.1108/CG-02-2021-0079
  58. Waddock S. A., Graves S. B. (1997), The corporate social performance-financial performance link, Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.

Salvatore Loprevite, Roberto Mavilla, Marco Spadaro, The “Control Paradox” in High-Crime Environments: Empirical Evidence from a Large-Scale Analysis on Italian SMEs in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 1/2026, pp 167-196, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2026-001008