Self-control apps as training tools for a digital wellness model in the workplace

Journal title EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING
Author/s Corrado Petrucco, Luca Lorenzon
Publishing Year 2026 Issue 2026/1
Language Italian Pages 17 P. 43-59 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/exioa1-2026oa23216
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Intensive smartphone use in the workplace leads to well-documented phenomena: distraction from notifications, reliance on the device as a strategy for emotional regulation, and difficulty maintaining clear boundaries between professional and personal life. When these behaviors become entrenched, they constitute what the literature refers to as Problematic Smartphone Use (PSU), a widespread problem that manifests with varying intensity depending on the context and the individual’s situation. The most common organizational responses ‒ such as bans or policies on device use ‒ address the symptoms without addressing the underlying mechanisms or helping employees develop lasting self-regulation skills. This exploratory mixed-methods study involved 20 employees of a social cooperative in Northern Italy (10 educators, 10 administrative staff), who voluntarily used one of two proposed self-control apps for one week: Forest, based on gamification, and AppBlock, based on scheduled restrictions. Data were collected via a post-intervention questionnaire (37 items, Likert scale) and eight semi-structured interviews. Emotional coping emerged as the most significant PSU dimension in the sample, with higher scores among administrative staff than among educators. The two apps showed essentially equivalent perceived effectiveness, which suggests that the interpretation should focus on the reflective process they trigger rather than on the specific technical function of the tool. From the perspective of the reflective practitioner (Schön, 1983), Forest and AppBlock function as mediators of reflection-in-action, making previously automatic behaviors observable. The study proposes an app-based training model and discusses the role of the corporate trainer as a facilitator of digital awareness rather than a purveyor of technological solutions.

Keywords: problematic smartphone use;digital wellness;reflective practice;self-control apps;corporate training

  1. Greenhaus J. H., & Beutell N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1): 76-88. Doi: 10.2307/258214.
  2. Al-Mansoori R., Al-Thani D., & Ali R. (2023). Designing for digital wellbeing: From theory to practice, a scoping review. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(3): 1-35. Doi: 10.1145/3571730.
  3. Amirabdolahian S., Morin C., Saad N., & Gagnon M. P. (2025). Digital wellness programs in the workplace: A meta-review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e70982. Doi: 10.2196/70982.
  4. Billieux J., Van der Linden M., & Rochat L. (2008). The role of impulsivity in actual and problematic use of the mobile phone. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(9): 1195-1210. Doi: 10.1002/acp.1429.
  5. Blake H., Hassard J., Singh J., & Teoh K. (2024). Work-related smartphone use during off-job hours and work-life conflict: A scoping review. PLOS Digital Health, 3(7): e0000554. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000554.
  6. Bottaro R., De Giovanni K., & Faraci P. (2024). The extent to which technostress is related to employees’ work-life fit: A multilevel meta-analysis. Workplace Health & Safety, 72(8): 501-512. Doi: 10.1177/21650799241264317.
  7. Brailovskaia J., Siegel J., Precht L.-M., Friedrichs S., Schillack H., & Margraf J. (2024). Less smartphone and more physical activity for a better work satisfaction, motivation, work-life balance, and mental health: An experimental intervention study. Acta Psychologica, 250, 104494. Doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104494.
  8. Brand M., Wegmann E., Stark R., Müller A., Wölfling K., Robbins T. W., & Potenza M. N. (2019). The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 104: 1-10. Doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032.
  9. Braun V., & Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77-101. Doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  10. Büchi M. (2024). Digital well-being theory and research. New Media & Society, 26(1): 172-189. Doi: 10.1177/14614448211056851.
  11. Busch P. A., & McCarthy S. (2021). Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: A systematic literature review of an emerging research area. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106414. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106414.
  12. Chin B., Slutsky J., Raye J., & Creswell J. D. (2018). Mindfulness training reduces stress at work: A randomized controlled trial. Mindfulness, 10: 627-638. Doi: 10.1007/s12671-018-1022-0.
  13. Christodoulou V., Flaxman P., Morris E., & Oliver J. E. (2024). Comparison of mindfulness training and acceptance and commitment therapy in a workplace setting: Results from a randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 33: 368-384. Doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2024.2314934.
  14. Citton Y. (2017). The ecology of attention (B. O’Keeffe, Trans.). Polity Press.
  15. Collins D., Harvey S. B., Lavender I., Glozier N., Christensen H., & Deady M. (2020). A pilot evaluation of a smartphone application for workplace depression. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17. Doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186753.
  16. Creswell J. W., & Plano Clark V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  17. Deci E. L., & Ryan R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4): 227-268. Doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
  18. Dongre A., Deshmukh P., & Pandya H. (2025). Integrating reflective practice into public health postgraduate programs to develop professional capabilities. Education for Health, 38(2): 176-183. Doi: 10.62694/efh.2025.273.
  19. Duke É., & Montag C. (2017). Smartphone addiction, daily interruptions and self-reported productivity. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 6: 90-95. Doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2017.07.002.
  20. Kurosawa T., Adachi K., & Takizawa R. (2023). Mindful self-compassion smartphone intervention for worker mental health in Japan: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 13. Doi: 10.2196/53541.
  21. Lin Y., & Zhou X. (2025). Unravelling the dynamics between smartphone use and psychological well-being: A two-wave panel study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(16): 3935-3961. Doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2025.2455399.
  22. Mascaro J. S., Wehrmeyer K., Mahathre V., & Darcher A. (2020). A longitudinal, randomized and controlled study of App-delivered mindfulness in the workplace. Journal of Wellness. Doi: 10.18297/jwellness/vol2/iss1/4.
  23. Mertens L., Brockmeier L. C., Roitzheim C., Radtke T., Dingler T., & Keller J. (2026). Promoting self-regulated social media use on smartphones with a mobile intervention App (Wellspent): Randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 14, e56824. Doi: 10.2196/56824.
  24. Ng B., Siacor K. H., Abbas D., Yeoh C., & Goh D. (2024). Exploring an online metacognitive intervention on young and mature employees: A preliminary study. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 7(2): 287-295.
  25. Parry D. A., & Coetzee B. J. (2025). Do mindsets really matter? A second look at how perceptions of social media experiences relate to well-being. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. Doi: 10.1093/jcmc/zmaf011.
  26. Roffarello A. M., & De Russis L. (2023). Achieving digital wellbeing through digital self-control tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30(4): 1-66. Doi: 10.1145/3571810.
  27. Schön D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
  28. Star S. L., & Griesemer J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3): 387-420. Doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001.
  29. Thaler R. H., & Sunstein C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
  30. Troll E. S., Friese M., & Loschelder . D. (2021). Self-control in the digital domain: Conceptualization, measurement, and validation of a digital self-control scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106767. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106767.
  31. Tung S. E. H., Gan W. Y., Poon W. C., Lee L. J., Ruckwongpatr K., Kukreti S., Griffiths M. D., Pakpour A. H., & Lin C.-Y. (2025). The mediating effect of nomophobia in the relationship between problematic social media use/problematic smartphone use and psychological distress among university students. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 30(7): 1409-1425. Doi: 10.1080/13548506.2025.2478516.
  32. Tyler J., Boldi M.-O., & Cherubini M. (2022). Contemporary self-reflective practices: A large-scale survey. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103768. Doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103768.
  33. Ward A. F., Duke K., Gneezy A., & Bos M. W. (2017). Brain drain: The mere presence of one's own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2): 140-154. Doi: 10.1086/691462.
  34. Yildirim C., & Correia A.-P. (2015). Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Computers in Human Behavior, 49: 130-137. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.059.

Corrado Petrucco, Luca Lorenzon, App di self-control come strumenti formativi per un modello di digital wellness sul lavoro in "EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING" 1/2026, pp 43-59, DOI: 10.3280/exioa1-2026oa23216