Accounting research production and evaluation: The view of the professionals
Journal title FINANCIAL REPORTING
Author/s Orazio Vagnozzi
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/2
Language English Pages 6 P. 75-80 File size 234 KB
DOI 10.3280/FR2017-002008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The existence of a gap between accounting research and accounting practice has been extensively described in literature. In order to be able to publish a research in a high-ranked accounting journal, it seems that methodological issues are more important than those related to the relevance of the topics covered. To improve research and accounting practice and to avoid the risk of accounting research becoming selfreferential, every effort should be made to bridge the current gap between research and accounting practice. To this end, the development of mutual knowledge of the agenda of researchers and practitioners on the one hand, and participation in joint projects on the other, could represent possible future solutions to be pursued.
Keywords: Accounting profession, accounting research, research impact, impact factor.
- Non-Fungible Token valuation: State of the art and future insight Paola Paoloni, Giuseppe Modaffari, Martina Manzo, in FINANCIAL REPORTING 2/2023 pp.39
DOI: 10.3280/FR2023-002002
Orazio Vagnozzi, Accounting research production and evaluation: The view of the professionals in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 2/2017, pp 75-80, DOI: 10.3280/FR2017-002008