Philosophies cartésiennes à l’usage des étrangers: les traductions latines du Traité de physique de Rohault et de la Recherche de la vérité de Malebranche

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA
Autori/Curatori Elena Muceni
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2017/4
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 24 P. 641-664 Dimensione file 88 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2017-004009
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Cartesianisms for foreigners: the Latin translations of Rohault’s Traité de Physique and Malebranche’s Recherche de la vérité. Few philosophical texts of the early modern period were translated into Latin. However, in the 17th century, we find multiple Latin translations of contemporary philosophical works, such as the Traité de physique by Jacques Rohault and De la Recherche de la vérité by Nicolas Malebranche. The Latin translations of these texts inspired by Descartes’s philosophy were both published at the end of the century, respectively in 1674 and 1685, by two Genevan printers. The Treatise of Rohault was then retranslated into Latin twice, first by Antoine Le Grand (1682) and then by Samuel Clarke (1697), whereas the translation of the Recherche by Jacques Lenfant inspired a new (anonymous) adaptation in the middle of the 18th century (1753). The article examines the first Latin translations of Rohault’s and Malebranche’s works and compares them with the subsequent versions in order to grasp the characteristics of Latin translation of philosophical texts, namely works of Cartesian inspiration. The analysis of these translations allows to define a kind of "paradigm" for the translation of Cartesian texts, suggested (not only implicitly but also explicitly) by the translators themselves.

Keywords:Translations of philosophical texts, Latin translations, Malebranche, Rohault, reception of Cartesianism

  1. Adam 2000: Michel Adam, L’Eucharistie chez les penseurs français du dix-septième siècle, Olms, Hildesheim 2000.
  2. Antoine-Mahut 2009: Delphine Antoine-Mahut, L’Homme cartésien. La force qu’a l’âme de mouvoir le corps, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Rennes 2009.
  3. Ariew 2006: Roger Ariew, Descartes, les premiers cartésiens et la logique, «Revue de métaphysique et de morale» 49 (2006), p. 55-71.
  4. Bonnant 1999: Georges Bonnant, Le Livre genevois sous l’ancien régime, Droz, Genève 1999.
  5. Borghero 1983: Carlo Borghero, La Certezza e la storia. Cartesianesimo, pirronismo e conoscenza storica, Franco Angeli, Milano 1983.
  6. Brown 2017: Stuart Brown, Les Admirateurs anglais de Malebranche dans l’Angleterre des années 1690, in Elena Muceni et Maria-Cristina Pitassi (éds.), Le Malebranchisme à l’épreuve de ses amis et de ses ennemis. Actes du colloque de Genève, 27 novembre 2015, Champion, Paris 2018, à paraître.
  7. Burke 2007: Peter Burke, Translations into latin in early modern Europe, in Peter Burke et R. Po-chia Hsia, Cultural Translations in early modern Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007.
  8. Clair 1978: Pierre Clair, Jacques Rohault, Éditions du CNRS, Paris 1978.
  9. Clatterbaugh 1999: Kenneth Clatterbaugh, The Causation debate in Modern Philosophy, Routledge, New-York/London 1999
  10. Clauberg 1664: Johannes Clauberg, Corporis et animae in homine conjunctio (1663) in Opera Omnia Philosophica, éd. Johann Theodor Schalbruch, Blaeu, Amsterdam 1691.
  11. Combe 1814: William Combe, A History of the University of Oxford, Its Colleges, Halls, and public buildings, Ackermann, Londres 1814.
  12. Cordemoy 1679: Géraud de Cordemoy, Tractatus physici duo (trad. Leclerc), Jean Pictet, Genève 1679.
  13. Cordemoy 1666: Id., Le Discernement du corps et de l’ame en six discours, Lambert, Paris 1666.
  14. Descartes 1644a: René Descartes, Specimina Philosophiae, Elzevier, Amsterdam 1644.
  15. Descartes 1644b: Id., Principia Philosophiae, Elzevier, Amsterdam 1644.
  16. Descartes 1649: Id., A Discourse of a Method for the well-guiding of Reason, and the discovery of Truth in the Science, printed for John Holden, London 1649.
  17. Descartes 1650a: Id., Passiones Animae, Amsterdam 1650.
  18. Descartes 1650b: Id., The Passion of the Soule in three Books, printed for A.C., sold by J. Martin, and J. Ridley, London 1650.
  19. Descartes 1662: Id., De Homine, Leffen & Moyardum, Leiden 1662.
  20. Descartes 1672a: Id., Explicatio Machinarum vel instrumentorum, Joachimi Reumanni, Kiel 1672.
  21. Descartes 1672b: Id., Tractatus de Formatione Fœtus,Gaesbeek, Leiden et Amsterdam 1672.
  22. Dessì, Lotti 2011: Paola Dessí et Brunello Lotti (éds.), Eredità cartesiane nella cultura britannica, Le Lettere, Firenze 2011.
  23. Dobre, Bullock 2013: Mihnea Dobre, Tammy Nyden-Bullock, Cartesian Empiricism, Springer, Dordrecht 2013.
  24. Dobre 2014: Minhea Dobre, Mixing Cartesianism and Newtonianism: the reception of Cartesian physics in England, in Gianna Katsiampoura (éd.), Scientific cosmopolitanism and local cultures: religions, ideologies, societies, National Hellenic Research Foundation, Athène 2014, pp. 126-131.
  25. Fevbre, Martin 1958: Lucien Febvre et Henri-Jean Martin (éds.), L’Apparition du livre, Albin Michel, Paris 1958.
  26. Gascoigne 2002: John Gascoigne, Cambridge in the Age of the Enlightenment: Science, Religion and Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2002.
  27. Gaukroger 1961: Stephen Gaukroger, Mining all within: Clarke’s notes to Rohault’s Traité de physique, «The Thomist» 24 (1961), pp. 353-364.
  28. Germann 1980: Martin Germann, L’Éditeur genevois Johann Hermann Widerhold et le public savant à Zurich vers 1670 in Cinq siècles d’imprimerie genevoise, Société d’histoire et d’archéologie, Genève 1980, pp. 299-340.
  29. Gilson 1960: Etienne Gilson, Index scolastico-cartésien, Vrin, Paris 1960.
  30. Gootjets 2013: Albert J. Gootjes, A Smattering of the New Philosophy: Étienne Gaussen (ca. 1638-1675) and the Cartesian Question at Saumur, in Jordan J. Ballor, David S. Sytsma & Jason Zuidema (éds.), Church and School in Early Modern Protestantism: Studies in Honor of Richard A. Muller on the Maturation of a Theological Tradition, Brill, Leiden 2013, pp. 583-596.
  31. Gootjes 2014: Id., Claude Pajon (1626-1685) and the Academy of Saumur, Brill, Leiden 2014.
  32. Hartmann 1685: Johannes Hartmann, Praxis Chymiatrica (trad. Bonet), Pierre Chouet, Genève 1685.
  33. Henry 2013: John Henry, The Reception of Cartesianism in Peter R. Anstey (éd.), The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2013, pp. 116-143.
  34. Heyd 1982: Michael Heyd, Between Orthodoxy and the Enlightenment. Jean-Robert Chouet and the Introduction of Cartesian Science in the Academy of Geneva, Nijhoff, La Haye 1982.
  35. Klauber 1990: Martin I. Klauber, Reason, Revelation, and Cartesianism: Louis Tronchin and Enlightened Orthodoxy in Late Seventeenth-Century Geneva, «Church History», 59 (1990), pp. 326-339.
  36. Klauber 1994: Id., Between Reformed Scholasticism and Pan-Protestantism, Susquehanna University Press, Selinsgrove 1994.
  37. La Forge 1665: Id., Traitté de l’esprit de l’homme, Abraham Wolfgang, Amsterdam s.d. [1665].
  38. La Forge 1669: Id., Tractatus de Mente Humana, Amsterdam 1669.
  39. Le Banc, Simonutti 2015: Charles Le Blanc et Luisa Simonutti (éds.), Le Masque de l’écriture, Droz, Genève 2015.
  40. Malebranche 1674: [Malebranche], De la recherche de la vérité, Pralard, Paris 1674-1675.
  41. Malebranche 1685: Id., De Inquirenda Veritate, Dufour, Genève 1685.
  42. Malebranche 1687: Id., De Inquirenda Veritate (trad. Lenfant), Swalle, Londres 1687.
  43. Malebranche 1689: Id., De Inquirenda Veritate (trad. Lenfant), Typis et Sumptibus societatis [Chouet, Cramer, De Tournes], Genève 1689.
  44. Malebranche 1690: Id., De Inquirenda Veritate (trad. Lenfant), Typis et Sumptibus societatis [Chouet, Cramer, De Tournes], Genève 1690.
  45. Malebranche 1691a: Id., De Inquirenda Veritate (trad. Lenfant), Typis et Sumptibus societatis [Chouet, Cramer, De Tournes], Genève 1691.
  46. Malebranche 1691b: Id., De inquirenda Varitate (trad. Lenfant), Typis et Sumptibus societatis [Chouet, Cramer, De Tournes], Cologne [i.e. Genève] 1691.
  47. Malebranche 1694 a: Id., Search after Truth (trad. Richard Sault), John Dunton, London 1694.
  48. Malebranche 1694 b: Father Malebranche’s Treatise concerning The Search after Truth (trad. Taylor), Thomas Bennet, Oxford 1694.
  49. Malebranche 1753: Id., Tractatus de Inquisitione Veritatis, De Tournes, Genève 1753.
  50. McCracken 1983: Charles McCracken, Malebranche and British Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1983.
  51. McKitterick 1992: David McKitterick, A History of Cambridge University Press, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992.
  52. Moutaux 2000: Jacques Moutaux et Olivier Bloch (éds.) Traduire les philosophes, Publications de la Sorbonne, Paris 2000.
  53. Muceni 2015: Elena Muceni, Malebranche à Genève, «Astérion» 13 (2015).
  54. Muceni 2016: Ead., Par amour pour la cause: les traductions idéologiques de Jacques Lenfant, «Revue d’histoire du protestantisme» 4 (2016), pp. 555-576.
  55. Nicolson 1929: Marjorie Nicolson, The Early Stage of Cartesianism in England, «Studies in Philology» 26 (1929), pp. 356-374.
  56. Nadler 1999: Steven Nadler (éd), Causation in early modern philosophy, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park (PA) 1993.
  57. Nadler 2011: Id., Occasionalism: Causation Among the Cartesians, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011.
  58. Pérez, Wilson-Lee 2015: José-M. Pérez Fernández, Edward Wilson-Lee (éds.), Translation and the Book Trade in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015.
  59. Plomer 1907: Henry Plomer, A Dictionary of Printers and Booksellers […] 1641-1667, Bibliographical Society, Londres 1907.
  60. Prost 1907: Joseph Prost, La Philosophie à l’Académie protestante de Saumur (1606-1685), Paulin, Paris 1907.
  61. Rohault 1671: Jacques Rohault, Traité de Physique, Vve de C. Savreux, Paris 1671.
  62. Rohault 1674: Id., Tractatus Physicus (trad. Bonet), Widerhold, Genève 1674.
  63. Rohault 1682: Id., Tractatus physicus, G. Wells & A. Swalle, Londres 1682.
  64. Rohault 1691: Id., Tractatus physicus, J. Paul, Amsterdam 1691.
  65. Rohault 1692: Id., Tractatus physicus, Swalle, Londres 1692.
  66. Rohault 1696: Id., Tractatus physicus, Swalle, Londres 1696.
  67. Rohault 1697: Id., Physica, Knapton, Londres, 1697.
  68. Rohault 1710: Id., Physica, Knapton, Londres 1710.
  69. Ryan 1935: John K. Ryan: Anthony Legrand, 1629-99: Franciscan and Cartesian, «The New Scholasticism», 9 (1935), pp. 226-250.
  70. Schofield 1970: Robert E. Schofield, Mechanism and Materialism, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1970.
  71. Schmaltz 2005: Tad M. Schmaltz (éd.), Receptions of Descartes: Cartesianism and Anti-Cartesianism in Early Modern Europe, Routledge, New York 2005.
  72. Schmaltz 2017: Id., Early Modern Cartesianisms, Dutch and French Constructions, Oxford University Press, New-York 2017.
  73. Schüller 2001: Volkmar Schüller, Samuel Clarke’s Annotations in Jacques Rohault’s Traite de Physique, and How They Contributed to Popularising Newton’s Philosophy, in Wolfgang Lefevre (éd.), Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant, Philosophy and Science in the Eighteenth Century, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London 2001, pp. 95-110.
  74. Sina 2008: Mario Sina, La Corrispondenza di Jean-Robert Chouet, professore di filosofia a Saumur e a Ginevra, Olschki, Firenze 2008.
  75. Sina 2011: Mario Sina, Marco Ballardin e Elena Rapetti (éds.), Corsi di filosofia, Olschki, Firenze 2011.
  76. Sina, Sina 2013: Maria Grazia et Mario Sina, Sull’Eucaristia: Scritti benedettini inediti negli anni del Traité de physique di Rohault, Olschki, Firenze 2013.
  77. Totaro 2011: Pina Totaro (éd.), Tradurre filosofi, Olschki, Firenze 2011.
  78. Van Bunge 2001: Wiep van Bunge, From Stevin to Spinoza, An Essay on Philosophy in the Seventeenth-Century Dutch Republic, Brill, Leiden-Boston-Köln 2001.
  79. Waquet 1998: Françoise Waquet, Le Latin ou l’empire d’un signe, Albin Michel, Paris 1998.
  80. Watson 1966: Richard A. Watson, The Downfall of Cartesianism 1673-1712, Nijhoff, The Hague 1966.
  81. Weidhass 2003: Peter Weidhass, Zur Geschichte des Frankfurter Buchmesse, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 2003.

Elena Muceni, Philosophies cartésiennes à l’usage des étrangers: les traductions latines du Traité de physique de Rohault et de la Recherche de la vérité de Malebranche in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 4/2017, pp 641-664, DOI: 10.3280/SF2017-004009