Note sulla storia dell’automazione. Dall’impatto sociale dell’automazione alla progettazione congiunta di tecnologia, organizzazione e sviluppo delle persone

Author/s Federico Butera
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/1
Language Italian Pages 21 P. 129-149 File size 94 KB
DOI 10.3280/SO2014-001006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Applications and social consequences of automation are explored in factories offices, travel, banking, retail, safety and others. Automation is not sheer displacement of tasks from men to machines but a stage in the process towards integrated systems of processes, technology, organization, roles and values, where technology performs a large variety of existing and new tasks, and where interaction is designed among human beings and technical systems. Technology upsets work and organization but only design resets them. Social and technical methodologies take the opportunity of the always existing "room of manoeuvre" for planning, design, and experimentation of systems. Social dimensions in technological development are not effects but instead matter of design.

Keywords: Automation, technical innovation, social effects of automation, technologic unemployment, quality of working life, sociotechnical systems design, human centred design.

  1. Buckingham, W. (1961), Automation: Its Impact on Business and People, New York, Harper & Brothers.
  2. Bagnara, S., Parlangeli, O., Tartaglia, R. (2010), “Are hospitals becoming high reliability organizations?”, Applied Ergonomics, 41:713-718.
  3. Barley, S.R., Gideon, K., (2004), Gurus, Hired Guns and Warm Bodies: Itinerant Experts in a Knowledge Economy, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
  4. Berman, M. (1982), All That is Solid Melts into Air. The Experience of Modernity, New York, Simon & Schuster, (trad. it: L’esperienza della modernità, Bologna, Il Mulino, 1985).
  5. Blauner, R. (1964), Alienation and Freedom: The Factory Worker and His Industry, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  6. Braverman, H. (1974), Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century, New York-London, Monthly Review Press.
  7. Bright, J.R. (1958), Automation and management, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
  8. Brynjolfsson, E., McAfee A. (2011), Race Against the Machine, Lexington, Digital Frontier Press.
  9. Butera, F. (1987), “Options for the future of work”, in Butera, F., De Martino, V., Koheler, E. (Eds.), Options for the future, London, Coogan.
  10. Butera, F. (2013), “Service professions. Le professioni dei servizi nelle organizzazioni come fattore chiave per la competitività e contro la disoccupazione”, Studi Organizzativi, 2: 91-103.
  11. Butera, F., Bagnara, S., Cesaria, R., Di Guardo, S., (Eds.) (2008), Knowledge working. Lavoro, lavoratori, società della conoscenza, Milano, Mondadori
  12. Università. Butera, F., Thurman, J.E. (1984), “An Approach to Automation and Work Design”, in Butera, F., Thurman, J.E., (Eds.), Automation and Work Design, Amsterdam, North-Holland.
  13. Cedefop (2010), New Skills for New Jobs: Action Now, Report by the Expert Group on New Skills for New Jobs, prepared for the European Commission.
  14. Crossman, E.R.F.W. (1960), Automation and skill, London, HMSO.
  15. Danziger, J.N. (1985), “Social science and the impact of computer technology”, Soc. Sci. Q. 66:3-21.
  16. Davis, L.E., Taylor, J.C. (1976), “Technology, organization and job structure”, in Dubin, R. (Eds.), Handbook of work, organization and society, Chicago, Rand McNally.
  17. Diebold, J. (1952), Automation: the advent of automated factor, New York, Van Nostrand.
  18. Emery, F.E., Trist, E.L. (1993), “The causal texture of organizational environments”, in Trist. E.L., Murray, H. (1993), The Social Engagement of Social Science, Vol. II, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.
  19. Freeman, C. (1998), Unemployment and long waves of economic development, London, Pinter.
  20. Friedman, J. (1971), “A non cooperative equilibrium for supergames”, Review of Economic Studies, 28:1-12.
  21. Gallino, L. (2006), Dizionario di Sociologia, Utet, Torino.
  22. Helander, M. (1988), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Amsterdam, North Holland.
  23. Hoc, J.M. (2000), Human-machine interaction to human-machine cooperation, London, Taylor & Francis Ltd.
  24. Kern, H., Schumann, M. (1984), Das Ende der Arbeitsteilung. Rationalisierung in der industriellen Produktion, Munchen, C.H. Beck Verlag.
  25. Kessels, J.W.M. (2001), “Learning in organisations: A corporate curriculum for the knowledge economy“, Futures, 33: 479-506.
  26. Lewis, M. (1998), “Designing for Human-Agent Interaction”, AI Magazine, 19(2).
  27. Mallet, S. (1975), The New Working Class, Nottingham, Spokesman.
  28. Meissner, M. (1969), Technology and the worker. Technical demands and social processes in industry, S. Francisco, Chandler Pub. Co.
  29. Momigliano, F., Siniscalco, D. (1982), “Note in tema di terziarizzazione e deindustrializzazione”, Moneta e Credito, 138: 143-181.
  30. Moretti, E. (2012), New Geography of Jobs, Boston, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  31. Noble, D. (1977), America By Design; Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism, New York, Knopf. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., (1995), The Knowledge Creating Company, New York, Oxford University Press.
  32. Norman, D.A., Draper, S.W. (Eds.) (1986), User Centered System Design: New perspectives on human computer interaction, Hillsdale, N.J., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  33. Perrow, C. (1984), Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, New York, Basic Books.
  34. Reason, J. (1990), Human Error, New York, Basic Book.
  35. Rifkin, J. (1995), The end of work: The decline of the global labour force and the dawn of postmarket era, New York, Putnam.
  36. Seely, B.J., Duguid, P. (1991), “Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward A Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation”, Organization Science, Vol. 2, 40-57.
  37. Sheridan, T.B., Hennessy, R.T. (Eds.) (1984), Research and Modeling of Supervisory Control Behavior, Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.
  38. The Third industrial revolution, Special Annual Report “Manufacturing and Innovation”, The Economist, April 21, 2012.
  39. Touraine, A. (1955), L’évolution du travail ouvrier aux usines Renault, Paris, CNRS (Eds.).
  40. Weick, K.E. (1990), “Technology as Equivoque: Sensemaking in New Technologies”, in Goodman, P., Sproull, L.S. (Eds.) (1990), Technology and Organizations, San Francisco, Jossey Bass.
  41. Woodward, J. (1965), Industrial organization: theory and practice, London, Oxford University Press.
  42. Zuboff, S. (1988), In The Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power, New York, Basic Books.

  • Perceived autonomy and discretion of mobile workers Roberto Albano, Ylenia Curzi, Tania Parisi, Lia Tirabeni, in STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI 2/2019 pp.31
    DOI: 10.3280/SO2018-002002

Federico Butera, Note sulla storia dell’automazione. Dall’impatto sociale dell’automazione alla progettazione congiunta di tecnologia, organizzazione e sviluppo delle persone in "STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI " 1/2014, pp 129-149, DOI: 10.3280/SO2014-001006