Medioplatonismo e neopitagorismo: un confronto difficile

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA
Autori/Curatori Bruno Centrone
Anno di pubblicazione 2015 Fascicolo 2015/2
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 25 P. 399-423 Dimensione file 124 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2015-002007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

This article makes a comparison between Pythagoreanism and Middle Platonism by taking into account writings and authors that traditionally constitute the core of Neopythagoreanism: Doric pseudopythagorica, Moderatos, Nicomachos, and Numenius. As for the pseudo- Pythagorean treatises, whose basic system seeks to unite Platonism with Aristotelianism across the full spectrum of the discussions in philosophy, the comparison mainly concerns Middle Platonic authors such as Eudoros and Philo. As for the extant authors, the main question addressed is that of their doctrinal identity, which lies on the confine between Platonism and Pythagoreanism.;

Keywords:Middle Platonism, Neopythagoreanism, pseudopythagorica, categories, Arithmology, orthodoxy

  1. - Balch 1992: David Balch, Neopythagorean Moralists and the New Testament Household Codes, in Wolfgang Haase, Hildegard Temporini (Hrsg.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, Band II 26.1, De Gruyter, Berlin and New York 1992, pp. 380-410.
  2. - Baltes 1972: Timaios Lokros. Über die Natur des Kosmos und der Seele, kommentiert von Matthias Baltes, Brill, Leiden 1972.
  3. - Baltes 1976: Matthias Baltes, Die Weltentstehung des Platonischen Timaios nach den antiken Interpreten, vol. I, Brill, Leiden 1976.
  4. - Becchi 1992: Francesco Becchi, L’ideale della metriopatheia nei testi pseudopitagorici: a proposito di una contraddizione nello Ps.-Archita, ≪Prometheus≫, II (1992), pp. 102-120.
  5. - Bonazzi 2007: Mauro Bonazzi, Eudorus and early Imperial Platonism, in Richard Sorabji, Robert W. Sharples (eds.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC-200 AD. 2 vols. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supplement 94, London 2007, pp. 365-378 - Bonazzi 2013a: Id., Eudorus of Alexandria and the “Pythagorean” pseudepigrapha, in Gabriele Cornelli, Richard McKirahan, Constantinos Macris (ed.), On Pythagoreanism, De Gruyter, Berlin 2013, pp. 385-404.
  6. - Bonazzi 2013b: Id., Pythagoreanizing Aristotle: Eudorus and the Systematization of Platonism, in Malcolm Schofield (ed.), Pythagoras, Plato, and Aristotle in the first century BC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2013, pp. 160-186.
  7. - Brisson 1999: Luc Brisson, Qualche aspetto della storia del platonismo, ≪Elenchos≫, XX (1999), pp. 145-169.
  8. - Burkert 1961: Walter Burkert, Hellenistische Pseudopythagorica, ≪Philologus≫, CV (1961), pp. 16-43; 226-246.
  9. - Burkert 1972a: Id., Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, tr. ingl., Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass. 1972.
  10. - Burkert 1972b: Id., Zur geistesgeschichtlichen Einordnung einiger Pseudopythagorica, in Kurt von Fritz (hrsg.), Pseudepigrapha 1, Fondation Hardt, Vandoeuvres-Geneve 1972, pp. 23-55.
  11. - Calabi 2008: Francesca Calabi, God’s Acting, Man’s Acting: Tradition and Philosophy in Philo of Alexandria, Brill, Leiden-Boston 2008.
  12. - Centrone 1990: Bruno Centrone, Pseudopythagorica ethica. I trattati morali di Archita, Metopo, Teage, Eurifamo, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1990.
  13. - Centrone 1996: Id., Introduzione ai Pitagorici, Laterza, Bari 1996.
  14. - Centrone 2000: Id., Cosa significa essere pitagorico in età imperiale. Per una riconsiderazione della categoria storiografica del Neopitagorismo, in Aldo Brancacci (a cura di), La filosofia in età imperiale, Bibliopolis, Napoli 2000, pp. 137-168.
  15. - Centrone 2000a: Id., Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the early empire, in Christopher Rowe and Malcolm Schofield (eds.), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000, pp. 559-584.
  16. - Centrone 2000b: Id., La letteratura pseudopitagorica. Origini, diffusione, finalità, in Giovanni Cerri (a cura di), La letteratura pseudepigrafa nella cultura greca e romana, ≪AION≫, XXII (2000), pp. 429-452.
  17. - Centrone 2014: Id., The pseudo-Pythagorean Writings, in Carl Huffman (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014, pp. 315-340.
  18. - Chiaradonna 2009: Riccardo Chiaradonna, Autour d’Eudore. Les débuts de l’exégèse des Catégories dans le Moyen Platonisme, in Mauro Bonazzi, Jan Opsomer (eds.), The Origins of the Platonic System. Platonisms of the Early Empire and their Philosophical Contexts, Peeters, Leuven 2009, pp. 89-111.
  19. - Chiaradonna 2013: Id., Alexander, Boethus and the Other Peripatetics: The Theory of Universals in the Aristotelian Commentators, in Riccardo Chiaradonna, Gabriele Galluzzo (eds.), Universals in Ancient Philosophy, Ed. della Normale, Pisa 2013, pp. 299-328.
  20. - Delatte 1942: Armand Delatte, Les traités de la royauté d’Ecphante, Diotogène et Sthénidas, Droz, Paris 1942.
  21. - Dillon 1977: John Dillon, The Middle Platonists, Duckworth, London (19962).
  22. - Dillon 1988: Id., Orthodoxy and Eclecticism, in John Dillon, Anthony Long (eds.), The Question of “Eclecticism”, University Of California Press, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London 1988, pp. 103-125.
  23. - Dillon 2007: Id., Numenius: some ontological questions, in Richard Sorabji, Robert W. Sharples (eds.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC-200 AD. 2 vols. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supplement 94, London 2007, pp. 397-402.
  24. - Dillon 2014: Id., Pythagoreanism in the Academic Tradition. The Early Academy to Numenius, in Carl Huffman (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014, pp. 250-273. - Dodds 1928: Eric Robertson Dodds, The Parmenides of Plato and the Origin of the Neoplatonic One, ≪Classical Quarterly≫, XXII (1928), pp. 129-142.
  25. - Donini 1982: Pierluigi Donini, Le scuole, l’anima, l’impero: la filosofia antica da Antioco a Plotino, Rosenberg & Sellier, Torino 1982.
  26. - Donini 1990: Id. , Medioplatonismo e filosofi medioplatonici. Una raccolta di studi, ≪Elenchos≫, XI (1990), pp. 79-93.
  27. - Donini 1994: Id., Testi e commenti, manuali e insegnamento: la forma sistematica e i metodi della filosofia in età postellenistica, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt, II 36.7, De Gruyter, Berlin-New York 1994, pp. 5027-5100.
  28. - Donini 2011: Id., Il de genio Socratis di Plutarco: i limiti del dogmatismo e quelli dello “scetticismo”, in id., Commentary and Tradition. Aristotelianism, Platonism and post-Hellenistic Philosophy, a cura di Mauro Bonazzi, De Gruyter, Berlin-New York 2011, pp. 403-422.
  29. - Dorrie 1963: Heinrich Dorrie, Pythagoreismus 1c., in RE Pauly-Wissowa 24.2, coll. 268-277.
  30. - Dorrie-Baltes 1987: Matthias Baltes, Heinrich Dorrie, Der Platonismus in der Antike, Band I, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt 1987.
  31. - Dorrie-Baltes 1993: Id., Der Platonismus in der Antike, Band III, Frommann-Holzboog, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt 1993.
  32. - Ferrari 2012: Franco Ferrari, L’esegesi medioplatonica del Timeo: metodi, finalità, risultati, in Il Timeo. Esegesi greche, arabe, latine, a cura di Francesco Celia e Angela Ulacco, ed. Plus, Pisa 2012, pp. 81-132.
  33. - Ferrari-Baldi 2002: Franco Ferrari, Luisa Baldi (a cura di), Plutarco. La generazione dell’anima nel Timeo, D’Auria, Napoli 2002.
  34. - Flinterman 2014: Jaap-Jan Flinterman, Pythagoreans in Rome and Asia Minor around the Turn of the Common Era, in Carl Huffman (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2014, pp. 341-59.
  35. - Frede 1987: Michael Frede, Numenius, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt, II 36.2, De Gruyter, Berlin and New York 1987, pp. 1034-1075.
  36. - Fuente Gonzalez 2005: Pedro Pablo Fuente Gonzalez, Noumenios d’Apamée, in Richard Goulet (ed.), Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques IV, Editions du CNRS, Paris 2005, pp. 724-740.
  37. - Harder 1926: Richard Harder, Ocellus Lucanus. Text und Kommentar, Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, Berlin 1926.
  38. - Huffman 1993: Carl Huffman, Philolaus of Croton. Pythagorean and Presocratic, Cambridge University Press 1993.
  39. - Huffman 2005: Id., Archytas. Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King, Cambridge University Press 2005.
  40. - Huffman 2014: Id. (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism, Cambridge University Press 2014.
  41. - Humm 1996, 1997: Michel Humm, Le origines du pythagorisme romain: Problèmes historiques et philosophiques, I: ≪Les E˙ tudes classiques≫ LXIV (1996), pp. 339-353; II: ≪Les E˙ tudes classiques≫ LXV (1997), pp. 25-42.
  42. - Macris 2002: Costantinos Macris, Jamblique et la littérature pseudo-pythagoricienne, in S.C. Mimouni (ed.), Apochryphité. Histoire d’un concept transversal aux religions du livre, Brepols, Turnhout 2002, pp. 77-129.
  43. - Zhmud 2012: Leonid Zhmud, Pythagoras and the Early Pythagoreans, Oxford University Press, 2012.
  44. - Zeller 1923: Eduard Zeller, Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, 3.Teil, 2 Abteilung, Wellmann, Leipzig 19235.
  45. - Whittaker 1987: John Whittaker, Platonic Philosophy in the Early Centuries of the Empire, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, II 36.2, De Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp. 81-123.
  46. - Trapp 2007: Michael Trapp, Neopythagoreans, in Richard Sorabji, Robert W. Sharples (eds.), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC-200 AD. Vol. 2, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Supplement 94, London 2007, pp. 347-363
  47. - Thom 2008: Johan C. Thom, The Passions in Neopythagorean Writings, in John T. Fitzgerald, (ed.), Passions and Moral Progress in Greco-Roman Thought, Routledge, London-New York 2008, pp. 67-78.
  48. - Thesleff 1972: Holger Thesleff, On the Problem of the Doric Pseudopythagorica, in Kurt von Fritz (hrsg.), Pseudepigrapha 1, Fondation Hardt, Vandoeuvres-Geneve 1972, pp. 57-87.
  49. - Thesleff 1965: Holger Thesleff (ed.), The Pythagorean Texts of the Hellenistic Period, Abo Akademi, Abo 1965.
  50. - Thesleff 1961: Holger Thesleff, An Introduction to the Pythagorean Writings of the Hellenistic Period, Abo Akademi, Abo 1961.
  51. - Theiler 1965: Willy Theiler, Philo von Alexandria und der Beginn des kaiserzeitlichen Platonismus, in Kurt Flasch (ed.), Parusia. Studien zur Philosophie Platons und zur Problemgeschichte des Platonismus. Festgabe fur J. Hirschberger, Minerva, Frankfurt am Main 1965, pp.199-218.
  52. - Tarrant 1993: Harold Tarrant, Thrasyllan Platonism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London 1993.
  53. - Szlezak 1972: Thomas Alexander Szlezak, Pseudo-Archytas über Die Kategorien, de Gruyter Berlin and New York 1984.
  54. - Storchi Marino 2000: Alfredina Storchi Marino, Il pitagorismo romano: per un bilancio di studi recenti, in Marisa Tortorelli Ghidini, Alfredina Storchi Marino, Amedeo Visconti (a cura di), Tra Orfeo e Pitagora, Bibliopolis, Napoli 2000, pp. 335-366.
  55. - Staab 2009: Id., Das Kennzeichen des neuen Pythagoreismus innerhalb der kaiserzeitlichen Platoninterpretation: „Pythagoreischer“ Dualismus und Einprinzipienlehre im Einklang, in Mauro Bonazzi, Jan Opsomer (eds.), The Origins of the Platonic System, Peeters, Louvain 2009, pp. 55-88.
  56. - Staab 2002: Gregor Staab, Pythagoras in der Spätantike. Studien zu De Vita Pythagorica des Iamblichos von Chalkis, Saur, Munchen-Leipzig 2002.
  57. - Runia 1995: David T. Runia, Why does Clement of Alexandria call Philo “the Pythagorean”?, ≪Vigiliae Christianae≫, XLIX (1995), pp. 1-22.
  58. - Petrucci 2012: Federico Petrucci, Teone di Smirne. Expositio Rerum Mathematicarum, Introduzione traduzione e commento, Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin 2012.
  59. - Opsomer 1998: Jan Opsomer, In Search of the Truth: Academic Tendencies in Middleplatonism, KWALSK, Brussel 1998.
  60. - O’Meara 1989: Dominic O’Meara, Pythagoras Revived. Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity, Clarendon Press, Oxford 1989.
  61. - Moraux 1984: Paul Moraux, Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen, Band 2: Der Aristotelismus im I. und II. Jahrhundert n. Chr., de Gruyter, Berlin-New York 1984.
  62. - Mansfeld 1988: Jaap Mansfeld, Compatible Alternatives: Middle Platonist Theology and the Xenophanes Reception, in van der Broek, Baarda and Mansfeld (eds.), Knowledge of God in the Graeco-Roman World, Brill, Leiden 1988, pp. 92-117. - Mansfeld 1992: Id., Heresiography in Context. Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy, Brill, Leiden 1992.

  • Music and Philosophy in the Roman Empire Francesco Pelosi, Federico M. Petrucci, (ISBN:9781108935753)
  • La critica sestana ai numeri pitagorici Flavia Palmieri, in Elenchos /2022 pp.315
    DOI: 10.1515/elen-2022-0017

Bruno Centrone, Medioplatonismo e neopitagorismo: un confronto difficile in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 2/2015, pp 399-423, DOI: 10.3280/SF2015-002007