Il contributo della process research agli sviluppi futuri della terapia familiare

Titolo Rivista RIVISTA DI PSICOTERAPIA RELAZIONALE
Autori/Curatori Laura Fruggeri, Francesca Balestra
Anno di pubblicazione 2015 Fascicolo 2015/42
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 19 P. 20-38 Dimensione file 73 KB
DOI 10.3280/PR2015-042002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

I terapeuti familiari sono sempre più sollecitati a documentare l’efficacia della terapia attraverso la ricerca d’esito, che valuta se la terapia familiare funziona; e la ricerca di processo, che descrive come funziona. Prendendo in considerazione il contributo di una serie di studi volti a documentare l’interazione fra terapeuta e famiglia e i processi di cambiamento osservabili nello strutturarsi del dialogo terapeutico, l’articolo riflette sulle implicazioni della ricerca di processo per la pratica e per la formazione nell’ambito della terapia familiare sistemica.;

Keywords:Evidence based practice, ricerca processuale, terapia familiare, dialogo terapeutico, dialogismo, posizionamento

  1. Balestra F. (2014). Mappare il cambiamento. Analisi dei processi interattivi in terapia familiare. Tesi di dottorato, Università degli Studi di Parma. http://hdl.handle.net/1889/2478
  2. Blow A.J., Sprenkle D.H., Davis, S.D. (2007). Is who delivers the treatment more important than the treatment itself? The role of the therapist in common factors. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33: 298-317. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00029.
  3. Burck C., Daniel G. (1995). Gender and family therapy. London: Karnac Books.
  4. Davey M.P., Davey A., Tubbs C., Savla J., Anderson S., eds. (2012). Second order change and evidence-based practice. Journal of Family Therapy, 34: 72-90. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00499.
  5. Escudero V. (2012). Reconsidering the “heresy” of using treatment manuals. Journal of Family Therapy, 34: 106-113. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2011.00581.
  6. Friedlander M.L., Escudero V., Heatherington L. (2006). Therapeutic Alliances in Couple and Family Therapy: An Empirically Informed Guide to Practice. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
  7. Fruggeri L. (2005). Diverse normalità. Roma: Carocci.
  8. Fruggeri L. (2008). Diverse normalità: discontinuità familiari e modelli di analisi. In: Chianura P., Schepisi L., Dalla Rosa A.C., Menafro M., Peruzzi P., a cura di, Le relazioni e la cura. Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 235-244.
  9. Fruggeri L. (2012). Different levels of psychotherapeutic competence. Journal of Family Therapy, 34, 1: 91-105. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2011.00564.
  10. Fruggeri L. (2014). La competenza psicoterapeutica: un costrutto multicomponenziale. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 1: 9-21. DOI: 10.3280/RPR2014-00100
  11. Gonçalves M., Guilfoyle M. (2006). Dialogism and psychotherapy: Therapists’ and clients’ beliefs supporting monologism. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19: 251-272. DOI: 10.1080/1072053060069172
  12. Gonçalves M., Ribeiro A.P., Mendes I., Matos M., Santos A. (2011). Tracking novelties in psychotherapy process research: The innovative moments coding system. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 5: 497-509. DOI: 10.1080/10503307.2011.56020
  13. Grossen M., Salazar Orvig A. (2008). Le dialogisme dans l’entretien clinique. Langage et société, 123: 37-52. DOI: 10.3917/ls.123.003
  14. Grossen M., Salazar Orvig A. (2011). Third parties’ voices in a therapeutic interview. Text & Talk, 31, 1: 53-76. DOI: 10.1515/text.2011.00
  15. Hermans H.J.M. (2006). The self as a theatre of voices: Disorganization and reorganization of a position repertoire. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 19: 147-169. DOI: 10.1080/10720530500508779
  16. HermansH.J.M.,DimaggioG.(2004).Thedialogicalselfinpsychotherapy.NewYork:Brunner⁄Routledge
  17. Leiman M. (2012). Dialogical sequence analysis in studying psychotherapeutic discourse. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 6: 123-147.
  18. Leonardi P., Viaro M.(1990). Conversazione e terapia. Milano: Cortina.
  19. Loriedo C. (2015). La terapia familiare basata sulle risorse. Relazione presentata al convegno “Dagli interventi paradossali alle narrazioni molteplici”, IIPR, Roma 25-27 giugno 2015.
  20. Marková I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Markovà I. (2006). On ‘the inner alter’ in dialogue. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 1.1: 125-147.
  22. McCarthy I. (2010). A Traumatic Intrusion with Transgressive Possibilities: Power as a Relational and Discursive Phenomenon. Context. Oct: 21-24.
  23. Minuchin S., Lee W.Y., Simon G.M. (2007). Mastering Family Therapy: Journeys of Growth and Transformation. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
  24. Patrika P., Tseliou E. (2015). Blame, responsibility and systemic neutrality: a discourse analysis methodology to the study of family therapy problem talk. Journal of Family Therapy, 4. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6427.1207
  25. Patterson J.E., Miller R.B., Carnes S., Wilson S. (2004). Evidence based practice for marriage and family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30.2: 183-195. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2004.tb01233.
  26. Peräkylä A., Antaki C., Vehviläinen S., Leudar I. (2008). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Pinsof W.M., Goldsmith J.Z., Tilden T. (2015). Empirically informed couple and family therapy: Past, present, and future. In: Sexton T., Lebow J., eds., Handbook of family therapy (4th Edition). London: Routledge.
  28. Potter J., Whetherell M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.
  29. Rober P. (2005). Family therapy as a dialogue of living persons. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31.4: 385-397. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01578.
  30. Roy-Chowdhury S. (2003). Knowing the unknowable: what constitutes evidence in family therapy? Journal of Family Therapy, 25: 64-85. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6427.0023
  31. Roy-Chowdhury, S. (2006). How is the therapeutic relationship talked into being? Journal of Family Therapy, 28: 153-174. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2006.00344.
  32. Salgado J., Cunha C., Bento T. (2013). Positioning Microanalysis: Studying the Self Through the Exploration of Dialogical Processes. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47: 325-353. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-013-9238-
  33. Seikkula J., Laitila A., Rober P. (2012). Making sense of multi-actor dialogues in family therapy and network meetings. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 38, 4: 667-687. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00238.x
  34. Sluzki C. (1991). La trasformazione terapeutica delle trame narrative. Terapia Familiare, 36: 5-19. DOI: 10.3280/TF2012-10001
  35. Sprenkle D.H., Davis S.D., Lebow J.L. (2009). Common Factors in Couple and Family Therapy: the Overlooked Foundation for Effective Practice. New York: Guilford Press.
  36. Stratton P., Bland J., Janes E., Lask J. (2010). Developing an indicator of family function and a practicable outcome measure for systemic family and couple therapy: the SCORE. Journal of Family Therapy, 32: 232-258. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00507.
  37. Todd N., Wade A. (2003). Coming to terms with violence and resistance: from a language of Effects to a language of Responses. In: Strong T., Pare D., eds., Furthering Talk: Advances in the Discursive Therapies. New York: Kluwer Academic Plenum.
  38. Tseliou E., Eisler I. (2007). “You” and “I”, “Us” and “Them”: A Systemic-Discursive Approach to the Study of Ethnic Stereotypes in the Context of British-Greek Heterosexual Couple Relationships. Family Process, 46: 515-522. DOI: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00229.
  39. Van Langenhove L., Harré R. (1994). Cultural stereotypes and positioning theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 24, 4: 359-372. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1994.tb00260.
  40. Walsh F., ed. (1982). Normal family processes. New York NY, US: Guilford Press (trad. it.: Stili di funzionamento familiare. Milano: Franco Angeli, 1986).
  41. Walsh F., a cura di (1993). Normal Family Processes. Second Edition. New York NY, US: Guilford Press.
  42. Walsh F., ed. (2003). Normal Family Processes. Third Edition. New York NY, US: Guilford Press.
  43. Walsh F., ed. (2012). Normal Family Processes. Growing Diversity and Complexity. New York: The Guilford Press.
  44. Whortam S., ed. (2001). Narratives in Action. New York: Teachers College Press.

Laura Fruggeri, Francesca Balestra, Il contributo della process research agli sviluppi futuri della terapia familiare in "RIVISTA DI PSICOTERAPIA RELAZIONALE " 42/2015, pp 20-38, DOI: 10.3280/PR2015-042002