Bibliometric literature review: An opportunity for marketing scholars

Author/s Marco Galvagno
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/4
Language English Pages 9 P. 7-15 File size 77 KB
DOI 10.3280/MC2017-004001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

  1. Archambault É., Campbell D., Gingras Y., Larivière V. (2009). Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(7): 1320-1326.
  2. Baker M.J. (2000). Writing a literature review. The Marketing Review, 1(2): 219-247.
  3. Benson M.J., Sporakowski M.J., Stremmel A.J. (1992). Writing reviews of family literature: Guiding students using Bloom’s taxonomy of cognitive objectives. Family Relations, 65-69.
  4. Boyack K.W., Klavans R. (2010). Co_citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 61(12): 2389-2404.
  5. Boyack K.W., Klavans R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12): 2389-2404.
  6. Boyack K.W., Newman D., Duhon R.J., Klavans R., Patek M., Biberstine J. R., et al. (2011). Clustering more than two million biomedical publications: Comparing the accuracies of nine text-based similarity approaches. PLoS One, 6(3): e18029.
  7. Chabowski B.R., Hult G.T.M., Mena J.A. (2011). The retailing literature as a basis for franchising research: Using intellectual structure to advance theory. Journal of Retailing, 87(3): 269-284.
  8. Chabowski B.R., Mena J.A., Gonzalez-Padron T.L. (2011). The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958-2008: A basis for future research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1): 55-70.
  9. Chabowski B.R., Samiee S., Hult G.T.M. (2013). A bibliometric analysis of the global branding literature and a research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(6): 622-634.
  10. Cronin P., Ryan F., Coughlan M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-bystep approach. British Journal of Nursing, 17(1): 38-43.
  11. Di Guardo M.C., Galvagno M., Cabiddu, F. (2012). Analysing the intellectual structure of e-service research. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications, 4(2): 19-36.
  12. Fink A. (2005). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage.
  13. Galvagno M. (2011). Anti-consumption research. Analisi bibliometrica della letteratura internazionale. Mercati e competitività, 2: 55-75.
  14. Galvagno M. (2011). The intellectual structure of the anti-consumption and consumer resistance field: An author co-citation analysis. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12): 1688-1701.
  15. Galvagno M., Dalli D. (2014). Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review. Managing Service Quality, 24: 643-683.
  16. Garfield E. (1964). Science Citation Index-A new dimension in indexing. Science, 144(3619): 649-654.
  17. Garfield E. (1970). Citation indexing for studying science. Nature, 227(5259): 669-671.
  18. Gurzki H., Woisetschläger D.M. (2017). Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis. Journal of Business Research, 77: 147-166.
  19. Hoffman D.L., Holbrook M.B. (1993). The intellectual structure of consumer research: A bibliometric study of author cocitations in the first 15 years of the Journal of Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4): 505-517.
  20. Jones R.P., Jones R.P., Runyan R., Runyan R. (2016). Conceptualizing a path-topurchase framework and exploring its role in shopper segmentation. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 44(8): 776-798.
  21. Ketcham C.M., Crawford J.M. (2007). The impact of review articles. Laboratory Investigation, 87(12): 1174-1185.
  22. Kessler M.M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1): 10-25.
  23. Kim J., McMillan S.J. (2008). Evaluation of internet advertising research: A bibliometric analysis of citations from key sources. Journal of Advertising, 37(1): 99-112.
  24. Lee N., Greenley G. (2010). The theory-practice divide: thoughts from the editors and senior advisory board of EJM. European Journal of Marketing, 44(1/2): 5-20.
  25. Leone R.P., Robinson L.M., Bragge J., Somervuori O. (2012). A citation and profiling analysis of pricing research from 1980 to 2010. Journal of Business Research, 65(7): 1010-1024.
  26. Mendes G.H., Oliveira M.G., Gomide E.H., Nantes J.F.D. (2017). Uncovering the structures and maturity of the new service development research field through a bibliometric study (1984-2014). Journal of Service Management, 28(1): 182-223.
  27. Orsigher C. (2016). Synthtizing research in marketing through meta-analysis. Mercati e Competitività, 2: 7-10.
  28. Paré G., Trudel M.C., Jaana M., Kitsiou S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information & Management, 52(2): 183-199.
  29. Petticrew M., Roberts H. (2006). Synthesizing the Evidence, in Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  30. Pinto M.J., Fernandes S. (2015). New questions arise: are bibliometric indicators adequate for evaluating the scientific production of the Social Sciences and Humanities?. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 4, SI: 161-169.
  31. Samiee S., Chabowski B.R. (2012). Knowledge structure in international marketing: a multi-method bibliometric analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2): 364-386.
  32. Schmidt F. (2008). Meta-analysis: A constantly evolving research integration tool. Organizational Research Methods, 11(1): 96-113.
  33. Seyedghorban Z., Matanda M.J., LaPlaca P. (2016). Advancing theory and knowledge in the business-to-business branding literature. Journal of Business Research, 69(8): 2664-2677.
  34. Sinkovics N. (2016). Enhancing the foundations for theorising through bibliometric mapping. International Marketing Review, 33(3): 327-350.
  35. Sharplin A.D., Mabry R.H. (1985). The relative importance of journals used in management research: An alternative ranking. Human Relations, 38(2): 139-149.
  36. Small H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4): 265-269.
  37. Sylvester A., Tate M., Johnstone D. (2013). Beyond synthesis: re-presenting heterogeneous research literature. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(12): 1199-1215.
  38. Torraco R.J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human resource development review, 4(3): 356-367.
  39. van Raan A.F.J. (2005). For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Measurement: interdisciplinary research and perspectives, 3(1): 50-62.
  40. Webster J., Watson R.T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly, xiii-xxiii.
  41. White H.D., Griffith B.C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3): 163-171.
  42. Zupic I., Cater T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3): 429-472.

  • A Bibliometric Analysis of Gamification Research Manuel Trinidad, Mercedes Ruiz, Alejandro Calderon, in IEEE Access /2021 pp.46505
    DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3063986
  • The Experience Logic as a New Perspective for Marketing Management Fabio Forlani, Andrea Buratti, Tonino Pencarelli, pp.15 (ISBN:978-3-319-77549-4)
  • A Bibliometric Map of Intellectual Communities in Frugal Innovation Literature Viviana DAngelo, Mats Magnusson, in IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management /2021 pp.653
    DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2020.2994043
  • Big Data Analytics in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: A Review of Literature Prathmesh Vasant Pawar, Ratna Achuta Paluri, in Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective /2022 pp.097226292210916
    DOI: 10.1177/09722629221091655
  • Using big data for co-innovation processes: Mapping the field of data-driven innovation, proposing theoretical developments and providing a research agenda Stefano Bresciani, Francesco Ciampi, Francesco Meli, Alberto Ferraris, in International Journal of Information Management 102347/2021 pp.102347
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102347
  • A bibliometric analysis on oil and gas pipeline failure consequence analysis Armin Aalirezaei, Golam Kabir, in Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 230/2021
    DOI: 10.1007/s41062-021-00591-0
  • Green Supply Chains and Digital Supply Chains: Identifying Overlapping Areas Viviana D’Angelo, Valeria Belvedere, in Sustainability /2023 pp.9828
    DOI: 10.3390/su15129828
  • Assessing the state of seahorse research through scientometric analysis: an update Thirukanthan Chandra Segaran, Hani Amir Aouissi, Mohd Iqbal Mohd Noor, Mohd Effendy Abd Wahid, Fathurrahman Lananan, Alexandru-Ionut Petrisor, Mohamad Nor Azra, in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries /2023 pp.1237
    DOI: 10.1007/s11160-023-09794-3
  • Knowledge mapping and visualization of personal information management literature, 1988–2020 Williams Ezinwa Nwagwu, Chidiebube Blossom Williams, in IFLA Journal /2022 pp.598
    DOI: 10.1177/03400352211065487
  • Frugal Approaches to Innovation: Industrial Settings and Innovation Strategies Viviana D'Angelo, Mats Magnusson, in IEEE Engineering Management Review /2022 pp.88
    DOI: 10.1109/EMR.2022.3171133
  • The other "meta" of meta-analysis: Qualitative and text-based approaches to "analysis of analyses" in marketing Ksenia Silchenko, in MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ 4/2018 pp.27
    DOI: 10.3280/MC2018-004003
  • COVID-19 Pandemi Döneminde Pazarlama Literatüründeki Eğilimler: Bibliyometrik Analizle Bir İnceleme Resul ÖZTÜRK, in OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi /2020 pp.1
    DOI: 10.26466/opus.788120
  • Supply chain risk and resilience in startups, SMEs, and large enterprises: a systematic review and directions for research Arsalan Safari, Vanesa Balicevac Al Ismail, Mahour Parast, Ismail Gölgeci, Shaligram Pokharel, in The International Journal of Logistics Management /2024 pp.680
    DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-10-2022-0422
  • Indigenous Knowledge and Disaster Risk Reduction Noorika Retno Widuri, Tupan, Ambar Yoganingrum, Rulina Rachmawati, Nana Sulaksana, Zufialdi Zakaria, pp.229 (ISBN:978-3-031-26142-8)
  • The Experience Logic as a New Perspective for Marketing Management Tonino Pencarelli, Marco Cioppi, Ilaria Curina, Fabio Forlani, pp.169 (ISBN:978-3-319-77549-4)
  • Mapping the Circular Economy Concept and the Global South Leticia Sarmento dos Muchangos, in Circular Economy and Sustainability /2022 pp.71
    DOI: 10.1007/s43615-021-00095-0

Marco Galvagno, Bibliometric literature review: An opportunity for marketing scholars in "MERCATI & COMPETITIVITÀ" 4/2017, pp 7-15, DOI: 10.3280/MC2017-004001