Assessment for learning in Norway. Opportunities for connoisseurship and language games in the globally important work of Gordon Stobart?

Titolo Rivista CADMO
Autori/Curatori Stephen Dobson Dobson
Anno di pubblicazione 2026 Fascicolo 2026/1
Lingua Italiano Numero pagine 19 P. 5-23 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/cad2026oa23294
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche.

This article examines the influence of Gordon Stobart, a pivotal figure in the assessment for learning movement that originated in the UK and became globally significant, with particular focus on his work in Norway. The author, a former doctoral student of Stobart’s, argues that he embodies the figure of an “assessment connoisseur”, able to communicate complex ideas through storytelling, humour, and careful attention to context and audience. Drawing on Wittgenstein, the article introduces the concept of “language games of assessment” to describe the different registers – popular, technical, disciplinary – through which Stobart adapts his message for teachers, academics, and civil servants. The paper is structured around three roles in which Stobart operates as a connoisseur: the teacher, illustrated through the author’s personal experience as his doctoral student at the Institute of Education in London; the researcher, through analysis of his book Testing Times and his engagement with Norwegian academics via the NELVU assessment network; and the policy adviser, in relation to his involvement in the Norwegian national assessment for learning policy (20102018) led by the Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. The article highlights how Norway’s culture of equality (Janteloven) resonated with Stobart’s selfeffacing and nonhierarchical approach, distinguishing him from other prominent figures in the movement, such as Dylan Wiliam. Direct testimonies from Norwegian civil servants who collaborated with him are also presented, supporting the paper’s central claim: Stobart’s ability to “touch” diverse audiences through practical experience, theoretical scholarship, and cultural sensitivity, contributing lastingly to the international spread of formative assessment.

Parole chiave:assessment for learning; connoisseurship; language games; Gordon Stobart; Norway’s culture of equality

  1. Benjamin, W. (1973), The storyteller: Reflections on the Works of Nikolai Leskov. In H. Arendt (ed.), W. Benjamin, Illuminations. Waukega: Fontana Press, pp. 83109.
  2. Bennett, R. (2011), “Formative Assessment: A critical Review”, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 18 (1), pp. 525, Doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2010.513678.
  3. Black, P., Wiliam, D. (1998), “Assessment and Classroom Learning”, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5 (1), pp. 774, https://doi. org/10.1080/0969595980050102.
  4. Black, P., Wiliam, D. (2009), “Developing the Theory of formative assessment”, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21 (1), pp. 531, Doi: 10.1007/s1109200890685.
  5. Day, C., Stobart, G., Sammons, P., Kington, A., Gu, Q., Smees, R., Mujtaba, T. (2006), Variations in Teachers’ Work, Lives and Effectiveness, DfES Research Report No. 743.
  6. Dobson, S. (2009), “Review of Testing Times. The Uses and Abuses of Assessment, by Gordon Stobart”, Nordic Studies in Education, 30 (1), pp. 6371, <a href="https://www.scup.com/doi/10.18261/ISSN1891594920100105">https://www.scup.com/doi/10.18261/ISSN1891594920100105</a>.
  7. Dobson, S. (2017), Assessing the Viva in Higher Education. Chasing Moments of Truth. Cham: Springer.
  8. Dobson, S., Fudiyartanto, F. (2023), Transforming Assessment in Education – The Hidden World of Language Games. Cham: Springer.
  9. Eisner, E. (1998), “What do the Arts teach?”, Improving Schools, 1 (3), pp. 3236. Engh, R. Dobson, S., Høihilder, K. (2007), Vurdering for Læring (Assessment for Learning). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
  10. Engh, R., Gran, L. (2021), Vurdering for læring i skolen. På vei mot en bærekraftig og demokratisk læringskultur (Assessment for Learning in Schools. Towards a Sustainable and Democratic Learning Culture). Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
  11. Gardner, J., Harlen, W., Hayward, L., Stobart, G. (2008), Changing Assessment Practice: Process, Principles and Standards, <a href="https://www.nuffieldfoundation">https://www.nuffieldfoundation</a>. org/project/analysisandreviewofinnovationsinassessmentaria.
  12. Gulson, K., Lewis, S., Lingard, B., Lubienski, C., Takayama, K., Webb, T. (2017), “Policy mobilities and methodology: a proposition for inventive methods in education policy studies”, Critical Studies in Education, 58 (2), pp. 224241.
  13. Hanson, F. A. (1994), Testing Testing: Social Consequences of the examined life. Oakland: University of California Press.
  14. Hartberg, E., Dobson, S., Gran, L. (2012), Feedback i skolen (Feedback in the school). Oslo: Gyldendal.
  15. Hopfenbeck, T. N., Flórez Petour, M. T., Tolo, A. (2015), “Balancing tensions in educational policy reforms: Largescale implementation of assessment for learning in Norway”, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22 (1), pp. 4460.
  16. Klenowski, V. (2011), “Assessment for learning in the accountability era: Queensland, Australia”, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37 (1), pp. 7883.
  17. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training (2018), Observations on the National Assessment for Learning Programme (20102018). Skills development in networks, <a href="https://www.udir.no/contentassets/0b8163f632bd48ea9552">https://www.udir.no/contentassets/0b8163f632bd48ea9552</a> ae3693513654/thenorwegianassessmentforlearningprogramme_finalreport2018.pdf.
  18. Palamara, D. R. (2016), “Social status in Norway and the law of ‘jante’: An analysis of ISSP social inequality data”, European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8 (1), pp. 121, <a href="https://www.proquest.com/docview/1879179899?pqorigsite=primo&sea">https://www.proquest.com/docview/1879179899?pqorigsite=primo&sea</a> rchKeywords=Social+status+in+Norway+and+the+law+of+%27jante%27%3A+A n+analysis+of+ISSP+social+inequality+data&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals.
  19. Polanyi, M. (2009), The tacit dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  20. Sadler, D. R. (2012), “Assuring academic achievement standards: from moderation to calibration”, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 20 (1), pp. 519, Doi: 10.1080/0969594X.2012.714742.
  21. Schivelbusch, W. (2014), The railway journey: the industrialization of time and space in the nineteenth century. Oakland: University of California Press.
  22. Skogvoll, V., Dobson, S. (2011), Connoisseuren – med blikket for øyeblikket. Et kroppsfenomenologisk essay om det profesjonelle (Connoisseur – awareness of the moment. A corporeal phenomenological essay about professionality). In Ø. Haaland, S. Dobson, G. Haugsbakk (Eds), Pedagogikk for en ny tid (Education a new time). Son: Oplandske Publishers, pp. 161173.
  23. Stobart, G. (2008), Testing Times. The Uses and Abuses of Assessment. London: Routledge.
  24. Stobart, G. (2014), The Expert Learner. Challenging the Myth of the Expert Learner. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  25. Wiliam, D. (2009), Assessment for Learning: Why, What and How?. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
  26. Wittgenstein, L. (1953/1967), Philosophical investigations. New York: Macmillan. Wolf, A. (2011), Review of vocational education – the Wolf Report, www.gov.uk/govern ment/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/180504/DFE000312011.pdf.

Stephen Dobson Dobson, Assessment for learning in Norway. Opportunities for connoisseurship and language games in the globally important work of Gordon Stobart? in "CADMO" 1/2026, pp 5-23, DOI: 10.3280/cad2026oa23294