The Integrated Finance in FoodTech: A Qualitative Analysis of Sustainable Startup Scalability

Titolo Rivista CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Autori/Curatori Claudia Covucci, Dominique Lepore, Sebastian Caputo, Gianpaolo Basile, Alessandra Micozzi
Anno di pubblicazione 2026 Fascicolo 2026/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 28 P. 163-190 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/cgrds1-2026oa23331
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche.

This paper investigates the interaction between radical innovation and sustainable finance in the FoodTech sector, a context characterized not only by high capital intensity and delayed returns, but also by challenges related to consumer acceptance, regulatory requirements, and scalability. Through the longitudinal qualitative case study of Futura S.r.l., an innovative startup located in Southern Italy, the research examines how sustainable ventures navigate financial constraints within a peripheral entrepreneurial ecosystem. Drawing on the triangulation of documentary and operational sources, the study reconstructs the firm’s evolution. The findings reveal that startup growth is enabled by a hybrid financing architecture combining public grants, bank debt, private equity, and ecosystem partnerships. Moreover, the analysis shows that sustainability supports scalability through both signaling and substantive mechanisms. Indeed, transparent ESG metrics enhance legitimacy and reduce information asymmetries, while sustainability-oriented investments generate measurable capabilities that facilitate access to finance and strategic collaborations.
The study contributes to the literature on sustainable entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial finance by explaining how hybrid funding strategies support innovation in FoodTech ventures. Finally, it offers managerial implications for resource orchestration and network building, as well as policy implications regarding the role of public support in fostering sustainable entrepreneurship.

Parole chiave:Undertourism; public-private collaboration; destination competitiveness; sustainability; authenticity; multi-level governance.

  1. Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure: An actionable construct for strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1): 39–58. DOI: 10.1177/0149206316678451
  2. Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. Sage.
  3. Autio, E., Nambisan, S., Thomas, L. D., & Wright, M. (2018). Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1): 72–95. DOI: 10.1002/sej.1266
  4. Azoulay, P., Liu, C. C., & Stuart, T. E. (2017). Social influence given (partially) deliberate matching: Career imprints in the creation of academic entrepreneurs. American Journal of Sociology, 122(4): 1223-1271. DOI: 10.1086/689890
  5. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120. DOI: 10.1177/014920639101700108
  6. Bergh, D. D., Sharp, B. M., Aguinis, H., & Li, M. (2017). Is there a credibility crisis in strategic management research? Evidence on the reproducibility of study findings. Strategic Organization, 15(3): 423-436. DOI: 10.1177/ 1476127017701076
  7. Binder, J. K., & Belz, F. M. (2015). Sustainable entrepreneurship: What it is. In Handbook of Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Development Research (pp. 30–72). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  8. Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of anagement review, 36(1): 151-179. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2009.0382
  9. Bruneel, J., Ratinho, T., Clarysse, B., & Groen, A. (2012). The Evolution of Business Incubators: Intensifying support services to evolve from third to fourth generation. Technovation, 32(2): 110–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.003
  10. Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1): 29–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001
  11. Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling theory: A review and assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1): 39–67. DOI: 10.1177/0149206310388419
  12. Cornelissen, J. (2017). Editor’s comments: Developing propositions, a process model, or a typology? Addressing the challenges of writing theory without a boilerplate. Academy of Management Review, 42(1): 1-9. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2016.0196
  13. de Bettignies, J. E., & Brander, J. A. (2007). Financing entrepreneurship: Bank finance versus venture capital. Journal of business venturing, 22(6): 808-832. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.07.005
  14. Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1): 50–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005. 09.003
  15. Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1): 64–87. DOI: 10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64
  16. Derdabi, A., & Dvouletý, O. (2025). Funding sustainable entrepreneurship: A hybrid systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Nankai Business Review International, 16(2): 359–380. DOI: 10.1108/NBRI-03-2024-0025
  17. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160. DOI: 10.2307/2095101
  18. Di Stefano, G., King, A. A., & Verona, G. (2014). Kitchen confidential? Norms for the use of transferred knowledge in gourmet cuisine. Strategic Management Journal, 35(11): 1645-1670. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2179
  19. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1): 25-32. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
  20. Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Passiante, G. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119791. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791
  21. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.
  22. Ewens, M., Nanda, R., & Rhodes-Kropf, M. (2018). Cost of Experimentation and the Evolution of Venture Capital. Journal of Financial economics, 128(3), 422–442. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.03.001
  23. European Parliament and Council. (2020). Regulation (EU) 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment (EU Taxonomy Regulation).
  24. European Parliament and Council. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2464 as regards corporate sustainability reporting (CSRD).
  25. Futre, B. (2025). Unveiling the route to sustainable entrepreneurship: A comprehensive examination of sustainable new ventures financing through systematic literature review. Vision, 09722629251325089. DOI: 10.1177/09722629251325089
  26. Geddes, A., Schmidt, T. S., & Steffen, B. (2018). The multiple roles of state investment banks in low-carbon energy finance: An analysis of Australia, the UK and Germany. Energy policy, 115, 158-170. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.009
  27. Gompers, P. A. (2022). Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. In Venture capital (pp. 285-313). Routledge.
  28. Granstrand, O., & Holgersson, M. (2020). Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90, 102098. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
  29. Gummesson, E. (2017). Case theory in business and management. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  30. Hall, J., & Wagner, M. (2012). Integrating sustainability into firms’ processes: Performance effects and the moderating role of business models and innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(3): 183-196. DOI: 10.1002/bse.728
  31. Hockerts, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5): 481–492. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.005
  32. Hoon, C. (2013). Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: An approach to theory building. Organizational research methods, 16(4): 522-556. DOI: 10.1177/1094428113484
  33. Hoorani, B. H., Nair, L. B., & Gibbert, M. (2019). Designing for impact: The effect of rigor and case study design on citations of qualitative case studies in management. Scientometrics, 121(1): 285-306. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03178-w
  34. Horne, C., & Mollborn, S. (2020). Norms: An integrated framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1): 467-487. DOI: 10.1146/annurevsoc-121919-054658
  35. Howells, J. (2006). Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy, 35(5), 715–728. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005
  36. Isenberg, D. J. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, 88(6): 40–50. ISSN 0017-8012
  37. Johnson, P., Buehring, A., Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (2006). Evaluating qualitative management research: Towards a contingent criteriology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(3): 131-156. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00124
  38. Laureati, M., Proserpio, C., Jucker, C., & Savoldelli, S. (2024). Determinants of consumers’ acceptance and adoption of novel foods and ingredients in the European Union: A systematic review. Foods, 13(10), 1534. DOI: 10.3390/foods 13101534
  39. Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and business models: Integrative framework and propositions for future research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2): 665–681. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2396
  40. Mansouri, S., & Momtaz, P. P. (2022). Financing sustainable entrepreneurship: ESG measurement, valuation, and performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(6), 106258. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106258
  41. Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs. private sector myths. Anthem Press.
  42. Mosikyan S, Dolan R, Corsi AM, Bastian S. (2024) A systematic literature review and future research agenda to study consumer acceptance of novel foods and beverages. Appetite. Dec 1; 203: 107655. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107655
  43. Muñoz, P., & Cohen, B. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurship research: Taking stock and looking ahead. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(3): 300–322. DOI: 10.1002/bse.2000
  44. Ody-Brasier, A., & Vermeulen, F. (2020). Who is punished most for challenging the status quo?. Academy of Management Journal, 63(5): 1621-1651. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2017.0683
  45. OECD. (2018). Making blended finance work for the Sustainable Development Goals. OECD Publishing.
  46. OECD. (2026). Activating food-tech ecosystems in intermediary cities for sustainable food security. OECD Publishing.
  47. Passaro, R., Quinto, I., & Thomas, A. (2017). Start-up competitions as learning environment to foster the entrepreneurial process. International Journal of Entrepreneurial
  48. Behavior & Research, 23(3): 426-445. DOI: 10.1108/IJEBR-01-2016-0007
  49. Passaro, R., Quinto, I., & Thomas, A. (2020). Supporting entrepreneurship policy: An overview of Italian start-up competitions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 24(1): 1-30. DOI: 10.1504/IJEIM.2020.105274
  50. Patton, E., & Appelbaum, S. H. (2003). The case for case studies in management research. Management research news, 26(5): 60-71. DOI: 10.1108/01409170310783484
  51. Pauwels, C., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Van Hove, J. (2016). Understanding a new generation incubation model: The accelerator. Technovation, 50: 13-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2015.09.003
  52. Pillai, S. D., Goldfarb, B., & Kirsch, D. (2024). Lovely and likely: Using historical methods to improve inference to the best explanation in strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 45(8): 1539-1566. DOI: 10.1002/smj.3593
  53. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2): 62–77.
  54. Reinecke, J., Arnold, D. G., & Palazzo, G. (2016). Qualitative methods in business ethics, corporate responsibility, and sustainability research. Business ethics quarterly, 26(4): xiii-xxii. DOI: 10.1017/beq.2016.67
  55. Robb, A. M., & Robinson, D. T. (2014). The capital structure decisions of new firms. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(1): 153-179. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1345895
  56. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4): 222–237. DOI: 10.1002/bse.682
  57. Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E. G., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization and Environment, 29(1): 3–10. DOI: 10.1177/1086026615599806
  58. Schlange, L. E. (2009). Stakeholder identification in sustainability entrepreneurship: The role of managerial and organisational cognition. Greener Management International, 55: 13–32. DOI: 10.9774/GLEAF.3062.2006.au.00004
  59. Shepherd, D. A., & Patzelt, H. (2011). The new field of sustainable entrepreneurship: Studying entrepreneurial action linking “what is to be sustained” with “what is to be developed”. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1): 137–163. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00426.x
  60. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3): 355–374. DOI: 10.2307/1882010
  61. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9): 1759–1769. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484
  62. Stephens, N., Di Silvio, L., Dunsford, I., Ellis, M., Glencross, A., & Sexton, A. (2018). Bringing cultured meat to market: Technical, socio-political, and regulatory challenges in cellular agriculture. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 78: 155–166. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.04.010
  63. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571–610. DOI: 10.2307/258788
  64. Wickert, C., Post, C., Doh, J. P., Prescott, J. E., & Prencipe, A. (2021). Management research that makes a difference: Broadening the meaning of impact. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2): 297-320. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12666
  65. Yang, N., Dousios, D., Korfiatis, N., & Chalvatzis, K. (2024). Mapping the signaling environment between sustainability-focused entrepreneurship and investment inputs: A topic modeling approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(6): 5405–5422. DOI: 10.1002/bse.3748
  66. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
  67. York, J. G., & Venkataraman, S. (2010). The entrepreneur–environment nexus: Uncertainty, innovation, and allocation. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5): 449–463. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.007

Claudia Covucci, Dominique Lepore, Sebastian Caputo, Gianpaolo Basile, Alessandra Micozzi, The Integrated Finance in FoodTech: A Qualitative Analysis of Sustainable Startup Scalability in "CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES" 1/2026, pp 163-190, DOI: 10.3280/cgrds1-2026oa23331