Industry 5.0 in Waste Management: Uncovering the Dynamic Capabilities Behind the Transition

Titolo Rivista CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Autori/Curatori Maria Vincenza Ciasullo, Miriana Ferrara
Anno di pubblicazione 2026 Fascicolo 2026/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 26 P. 137-162 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/cgrds1-2026oa23330
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche.

Industry 5.0 represents a transformative paradigm that addresses disruptive megatrends by calling for a human-centred approach and sustainability orientation. Despite growing academic interest, little is known about how organisations are transitioning towards this innovative strategical posture, particularly in the service businesses. The study addresses this gap by investigating the dynamic capabilities that waste management organisations must activate to undertake the aforemen-tioned transition. Drawing on the Dynamic Capabilities Theory and a qualitative multiple-case study conducted on three Italian waste management firms, data were collected through 18 semi-structured interviews and archival sources and analysed by using the Gioia methodology. The results reveal three aggregate dimensions of capability such as: Waste Ecosystem Scanning Capability; People-Technology Orchestration Capability; Smart Waste Cycle Reconfiguration Capability. All togeth-er, these capabilities constitute an integrated architecture through which organisations perceive environmental complexity, orchestrate technological and human re-sources, and reconfigure their strategic, operational, and relational processes.

Parole chiave:Industry 5.0; Dynamic Capabilities; Waste Management; Sustainability; Humancentricity; Gioia Methodology

  1. Anitha, R., & Parthiban, A. (2025). Smart waste ecosystems under industry 5.0: A framework integrating digital twins, edge-AI, graph theory, and 9R circularity. Results in Engineering, 107988. DOI: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.107988
  2. Beta, K., Nagaraj, S.S., & Coleman, A. (2025). Skills and dynamic capabilities for generative AI: embracing the Industry 5.0 paradigm and nourishing innovation in public institutions. Public Money Management, 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2025.2585357
  3. Breque, M., De Nul, L., & Petridis, A. (2021). Industry 5.0, towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Castillo-Montoya, M. (2016). Preparing for interview research: The interview protocol refinement framework. The Qualitative Report, 21(5): 811-831. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2337
  4. Chauhan, A., Pandey, G., Attri, S., Sethi, M., Singh, M.V., Barrili, S., & Malimba, P.M. (2026). Revolutionizing Waste Management: Harnessing AI and Industry 5.0 Applications for Sustainable Solutions. In The Circular Path: Rethinking Waste for a Sustainable Future (pp. 251-268). Springer Nature Switzerland.
  5. Ciasullo, M.V., & Ferrara, M. (2025). The nexus between sustainability and industry 5.0: a hybrid systematic review and future research agenda. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 45(1): 61-79. DOI: 10.1002/joe.70000
  6. Ciasullo, M.V., Calabrese, M., & La Sala, A. (2024). Surfing across industrial revolutions: A resilient sensemaking perspective on innovation. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 43(2): 27-42. DOI: 10.1002/joe.22219
  7. Ciasullo, M.V., La Sala, A., & Ferrara, M. (2023, April). Normalizing digitization into a new 5.0 equilibrium. Insights from socio-ecological systems. In The International Research & Innovation Forum (pp. 107-115). Springer International Publishing.
  8. Das, S., Lee, S.H., Kumar, P., Kim, K.H., Lee, S.S., & Bhattacharya, S.S. (2019). Solid waste management: Scope and the challenge of sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228: 658-678. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.323
  9. Destouet, C., Tlahig, H., Bettayeb, B., & Mazari, B. (2023). Flexible job shop scheduling problem under Industry 5.0: A survey on human reintegration, environmental consideration and resilience improvement. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 67: 155-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.01.004
  10. Eisenhardt, K.M., & Graebner, M.E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1): 25-32. DOI: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
  11. Ghobakhloo, M., Fathi, M., Iranmanesh, M., Vilkas, M., Grybauskas, A., & Amran, A. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in manufacturing: opportunities for actualizing Industry 5.0 sustainability goals. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 35(9): 94-121. DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-12-2023-0530
  12. Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Tseng, M.L., Grybauskas, A., Stefanini, A., & Amran, A. (2023). Behind the definition of Industry 5.0: A systematic review of technologies, principles, components, and values. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 40(6): 432–447. DOI: 10.1080/21681015.2023. 2216701
  13. Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Mubarak, M.F., Mubarik, M., Rejeb, A., & Nilashi, M. (2022). Identifying Industry 5.0 contributions to sustainable development: A strategy roadmap for delivering sustainability values. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33: 716-737. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.003
  14. Gioia, D.A., Corley, K.G., & Hamilton, A.L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational research methods, 16(1): 15-31. DOI: 10.1177/1094428112452151
  15. Gomathi, L., Mishra, A.K., & Tyagi, A.K. (2023, April). Industry 5.0 for Healthcare 5.0: Opportunities, challenges and future research possibilities. In 2023 7th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI) (pp. 204-213). IEEE.
  16. Govindaraj, M., Gnanasekaran, C., Ramasamy, M.M.S., & Suresh, N.R.V. (2024, November). Beyond conventional methods: A cost-benefit analysis of Industry 5.0 inspired machinery for solid waste management in the digital circular economy. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3192, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
  17. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods, 18(1): 59-82. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X05279903
  18. Hashim, M.A.M., Tlemsani, I., Mason-Jones, R., Matthews, R., & Ndrecaj, V. (2024). Higher education via the lens of Industry 5.0: Strategy and perspective. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9: 100828. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100828
  19. Helfat, C.E., & Peteraf, M.A. (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management journal, 36(6): 831-850. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2247
  20. Hussain, S., Singh, A.M., Mohanty, P., & Gavinolla, M.R. (2023). Next-generation employability and career sustainability in the hospitality industry 5.0. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 15(3): 308–321.
  21. Hyett, N., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2014). Methodology or method? A critical review of qualitative case study reports. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9(1): 23606. DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v9.23606
  22. ISPRA Report (2024) available at: <a href="https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/files2024/pubblicazioni/rapporti/rapportorifiutiurbani_ed-2024_n406_versione_integrale.pdf">https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/files2024/pubblicazioni/rapporti/rapportorifiutiurbani_ed-2024_n406_versione_integrale.pdf</a>
  23. Kvale, S. (2007). Learning the craft of interviewing.
  24. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews—Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  25. Longo, F., Padovano, A., & Umbrello, S. (2020). Value-oriented and ethical technology engineering in industry 5.0: A human-centric perspective for the design of the factory of the future. Applied sciences, 10(12): 4182. DOI: 10.3390/app10124182
  26. Maddikunta, P.K.R., Pham, Q.V., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T.R., Ruby, R., & Liyanage, M. (2022). Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications. Journal of industrial information integration, 26, 100257. DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257
  27. Magnani, G., & Gioia, D. (2023). Using the Gioia Methodology in international business and entrepreneurship research. International business review, 32(2): 102097. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102097
  28. Mesjasz-Lech, A. (2023). Can Industry 5.0 be seen as a remedy for the problem of waste in industrial companies? Procedia Computer Science, 225: 1816-1825. DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.171
  29. Modgil, S., Singh, R.K., & Agrawal, S. (2025). Developing human capabilities for supply chains: an industry 5.0 perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 348(3): 2075-2105. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05245-1
  30. Mohammed, A., Al Balushi, F. A., Zubairu, N., & Govindan, K. (2025). Dynamics capabilities 5.0 toward inner business resiliency: A conceptual and evaluation panacea. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 206: 111223. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2025.111223
  31. Montera, R., Nevi, G., & Cucari, N. (2026). Framing Quality 5.0 through purpose governance: a conceptual model for humanizing organizations. The TQM Journal, 1-23. DOI: 10.1108/TQM-08-2025-0476
  32. Nahavandi, S. (2019). Industry 5.0 􀯅 A human-centric solution. Sustainability, 11(16): 4371. DOI: 10.3390/su11164371
  33. Naughtin, C.K., Schleiger, E., Bratanova, A., Terhorst, A., & Hajkowicz, S. (2024). Forty years in the making: A systematic review of the megatrends literature. Futures, 103329. DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2024.103329
  34. Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  35. Rapley, T. (2014). Sampling strategies in qualitative research. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, 4: 49-63. DOI: 10.4135/9781446282243.n4
  36. Renda, A., Schwaag Serger, S., Tataj, D., Morlet, A., et al. (2021). Industry 5.0, a transformative vision for Europe: Governing systemic transformations towards a sustainable industry. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
  37. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  38. Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  39. Sustainable development foundation Report (2024) available at <a href="https://www.fondazionesvilupposostenibile.org/wpcontent/uploads/dlm_uploads/il-RICICLO-in-ITALIA-2024.pdf">https://www.fondazionesvilupposostenibile.org/wpcontent/uploads/dlm_uploads/il-RICICLO-in-ITALIA-2024.pdf</a>
  40. Teece, D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of dynamic capabilities and their role in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13): 1319–1350. DOI: 10.1002/smj.640
  41. Teece, D.J. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles. In Entrepreneurship, innovation, and platforms, 37, 211-225. Emerald Publishing Limited.
  42. Teece, D.J. (2023). The evolution of the dynamic capabilities framework. In Artificiality and sustainability in entrepreneurship: Exploring the unforeseen, and paving the way to a sustainable future (pp. 113-129). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  43. Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509–533. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
  44. Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6): 511-521. DOI: 10.1177/1077800411409884
  45. Turner III, D.W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3): 754-760. DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1178
  46. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception. Journal of manufacturing systems, 61: 530-535. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006
  47. Yin, R.K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Publications.
  48. Yin, R.K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage.
  49. Zoumpoulis, P., Konstantinidis, F.K., Tsimiklis, G., & Amditis, A. (2024, May). Advancing urban waste management using Industry 5.0 principles: A novel smart bin. In 2024 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT (MetroInd4.0 & IoT) (pp. i-vi). IEEE.

Maria Vincenza Ciasullo, Miriana Ferrara, Industry 5.0 in Waste Management: Uncovering the Dynamic Capabilities Behind the Transition in "CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES" 1/2026, pp 137-162, DOI: 10.3280/cgrds1-2026oa23330