Aligning compliance, quality, and service excellence in vocational education: a case study of Australian Harbour International College (AHIC),

Titolo Rivista CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Autori/Curatori Al Sadat Ibne Ahmed, Parves Sultan, Indrajit Das, Hind Hammouch, Sonal Trivedi, Otilia Manta, Maria Palazzo, Francesco Notari
Anno di pubblicazione 2026 Fascicolo 2026/1
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 26 P. 85-110 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/cgrds1-2026oa23328
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche.

The Vocational Education and Training (VET) sector operates at the intersection of regulatory compliance and service- quality imperatives, yet management scholarship has only partially examined how individual providers reconcile these tensions through integrated organisational frameworks. Addressing this gap, the study asks asingle guiding question through what organisational mechanisms does a regulated training provider co-produce compliance and service quality over time? This article addresses that question through a qualitative single-case study of Australian Harbour International College (AHIC), a Registered Training Organisation in Sydney that has developed a coherent Service Quality Management Framework spanning curriculum design, multi-source feedback systems, trainer development, digital infrastructure, and stakeholder engagement. Adopting a theory-elaborating case design grounded in the methodological tradition of qualitative research, the study triangulates institutional documents, audit reports, performance indicators, and stakeholder feedback. The analysis identifies five interlocking pillars through which the institution co-produces compliance and quality. Triangulated evidence shows measurable improvements in completion rates, learner and employer satisfaction, audit performance, and staff retention. The article reframes the compliance – quality dichotomy as a productive duality rather than a trade-off that is, as two organisational logics that, when structurally and culturally integrated, become mutually reinforcing rather than competing, in the manner theorised by the literature on organisational ambidexterity; refines the service-quality literature by foregrounding stakeholder feedback as a continuous-improvement governance device; and extends qualitative theorising on case-based inquiry by demonstrating how an embedded single-case design can illuminate context-sensitive organisational processes.

Parole chiave:Vocational Education and Training (VET); Service Quality Management; Student Experience; Australian Harbour International College (AHIC); Stakeholder Governance; Compliance; Dynamic Capabilities.

  1. Alemu, A. (2023). Assessing service quality in tertiary education using adapted SERVQUAL scale. Cogent Education, 10(2): 2259733. DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2023.2259733
  2. Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research. Journal of Management Studies, 50(1): 128-152. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01070.x
  3. Bergh, D. D., Boyd, B. K., Byron, K., Gove, S., & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2022). What constitutes a methodological contribution? Journal of management, 48(7): 1835-1848. DOI: 10.1177/01492063221088235
  4. Billett, S. (2011). Vocational education: Purposes, traditions and prospects. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  5. Brooks, R., & Everett, G. (2009). Post-graduation reflections on the value of a degree. British Educational Research Journal, 35(3): 333-349. DOI: 10.1080/01411920802044370
  6. Cornelissen, J. P. (2017). Preserving theoretical divergence in management research: Why the explanatory potential of qualitative research should be harnessed rather than suppressed. Journal of Management Studies. 54(3): 368-383. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12210
  7. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4): 532-550. DOI: 10.2307/258557
  8. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25-32. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
  9. Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1): 15-31. DOI: 10.1177/1094428112452151
  10. Gummesson, E. (2017). Case theory in business and management: Reinventing case study research. London: Sage.
  11. Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1): 9-34. DOI: 10.1080/0260293930180102
  12. Hernández-Campos, M., Gonzalez-Torres, A., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2025).
  13. Learning outcomes evaluation through learning analytics systems in higher education: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 15(3),
  14. Hoon, C. (2013). Meta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: An approach to theory building. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4): 522-556. DOI: 10.1177/1094428113484969
  15. Hoorani, B. H., Nair, L. B., & Gibbert, M. (2019). Designing for impact: The effect of rigor and case study design on citations of qualitative case studies in management. Scientometrics, 121(1): 285-306. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03178-w
  16. Iqbal, S. (2026). ISO 9001 as a catalyst: Linking staff training to university performance. The TQM Journal, 38(2): 197-222. DOI: 10.1108/tqm-06-2024-0216
  17. Johnson, P., Buehring, A., Cassell, C., & Symon, G. (2006). Evaluating qualitative management research: Towards a contingent criteriology. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(3): 131-156. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00124.x
  18. Kovaci, I., Tahiri, A., & Bushi, F. (2020). The link between students’ satisfaction and the quality of higher education in the Republic of Macedonia. Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, 16(2).
  19. Lindgreen, A., Di Benedetto, C. A., & Beverland, M. B. (2021). How to write up case-study methodology sections. Industrial Marketing Management, 96: A7-A10. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.012
  20. Magasi, C., Mashenene, R. G., & Ndengenesa, D. M. (2022). Service quality and students’ satisfaction in Tanzania’s higher education: A re-examination of the SERVQUAL model. International Review of Management and Marketing, 12(3): 18-25. DOI: 10.32479/irmm.13040
  21. National Centre for Vocational Education Research [NCVER]. (2024). Governmentfunded students and courses 2024. NCVER. <a href="https://www.ncver.edu.au">https://www.ncver.edu.au</a>
  22. Pan, Z., Biegley, L., Taylor, A., & Zheng, H. (2024). A systematic review of learning analytics: Incorporated instructional interventions on learning management systems. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(2): 52-72. DOI: 10.18608/jla.2023.8093
  23. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multipleitem scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1): 12-40. DOI: 10.1037/t09264-000
  24. Parasuraman, A., Berry, L. L., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991). Refinement and reassessment of the SERVQUAL scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4): 420-450.
  25. Parker, O. N., Short, C. E., Titus, V. K., Gong, K., & Nahm, P. I. (2024). Accentuate the positive? Strategic negativity amid the hazard of high expectations. Strategic Management Journal, 45(9): 1851-1874. DOI: 10.1002/smj.3603
  26. Patton, E., & Appelbaum, S. H. (2003). The case for case studies in management research. Management Research News, 26(5): 60-71. DOI: 10.1108/01409170310783484
  27. Paulsen, L., & Lindsay, E. (2024). Learning analytics dashboards are increasingly becoming about learning and not just analytics-A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(11): 14279-14308. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-023-12401-4
  28. Productivity Commission. (2025). Report on government services 2025: Vocational education and training. Australian Government. <a href="https://www.pc.gov.au/ongoing/report-on-government-services/2025">https://www.pc.gov.au/ongoing/report-on-government-services/2025</a>
  29. Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2): 129-150.
  30. Reinecke, J., Arnold, D. G., & Palazzo, G. (2016). Qualitative methods in business ethics, corporate responsibility, and sustainability research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(4): xiii-xxii. DOI: 10.1017/beq.2016.67
  31. Seet, P.-S., & Jones, J. T. (2021). Extending micro-credentials to micro-apprenticeships for the fourth industrial revolution: Enhancing vocational education and training in the post-pandemic’s “new normal”. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 12(1): 39-43. DOI: 10.21153/jtlge2021vol12no1art1317
  32. Seitova, M., Temirbekova, Z., Kazykhankyzy, L., Khalmatova, Z., & Çelik, H. E. (2024). Perceived service quality and student satisfaction: A case study at Khoja Akhmet Yassawi University, Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Education, 9: 1492432. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1492432
  33. Sharma, M., Singh, A., & Daim, T. (2023). Exploring cloud computing adoption: COVID era in academic institutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 193: 122613. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122613
  34. Simsek, Z., Fox, B. C., Heavey, C., & Liu, S. (2025). Methodological rigor in management research reviews. Journal of Management, 51(1): 103-131. DOI: 10.1177/01492063241237222
  35. Taraza, E., Anastasiadou, S., Papademetriou, C., & Masouras, A. (2024). Evaluation of quality and equality in education using the European Foundation for Quality Management excellence model-a literature review. Sustainability, 16(3): 960. DOI: 10.3390/su16030960
  36. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13): 1319-1350. DOI: 10.1002/smj.640
  37. Wickert, C., Post, C., Doh, J. P., Prescott, J. E., & Prencipe, A. (2021). Management research that makes a difference: Broadening the meaning of impact. Journal of Management Studies, 58(2): 297-320. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12666
  38. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Al Sadat Ibne Ahmed, Parves Sultan, Indrajit Das, Hind Hammouch, Sonal Trivedi, Otilia Manta, Maria Palazzo, Francesco Notari, Aligning compliance, quality, and service excellence in vocational education: a case study of Australian Harbour International College (AHIC), in "CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES" 1/2026, pp 85-110, DOI: 10.3280/cgrds1-2026oa23328