Soviet Theory of the History of Philosophy as Capstone of Soviet Philosophical Culture

Journal title RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA
Author/s Evert van der Zweerde
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/2
Language English Pages 15 P. 357-371 File size 668 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2018-002011
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In this essay, the author looks at the critiques that Soviet theoreticians of the history of philosophy, particularly Teodor Ojzerman and Aleksej Bogomolov, developed against the contemporary endeavors in the same scholarly field within the context of what, in the USSR, was called "contemporary bourgeois philosophy". What were the disputes about? Did Soviet philosophers have a point, or was it "sheer ideology" - or is that, perhaps, a false opposition? For the essay, the author uses primary sources from the Soviet Union as well as contemporary sources from France, Germany, and the USA. All of these are placed in their context of, on the one hand, the "Cold War" which, at least on the Soviet side, implied what one could label a "cold war on the philosophical front", but also, on the other hand, the various established traditions of research in the history of philosophy.

Keywords: History of philosophy, istoriko-filosofskaja nauka, Soviet philosophy, world philosophy, Hegel

  1. - Chamberlain 2006: Lesley Chamberlain, The Philosophy Steamer, Atlantic Books, London 2006.
  2. - DeBlasio 2014: Alyssa DeBlasio, The End of Russian Philosophy: Tradition and Transition at the Turn of the Century, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke 2014.
  3. - Diagne 2014: Souleymane Bachir Diagne, Comment philosopher en islam?, Éditions Jimsaan, Paris 2014.
  4. - Gúeroult 1988: Martial Gúeroult, Histoire de l’histoire de la philosophie, vol. 2: En Allemagne, de Leibniz à nos jours, Aubier, Paris 1988.
  5. - Hegel 1971: Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Werke in zwanzig Banden, Bd. 18: Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1971.
  6. - Kant 1977: Immanuel Kant, Über die von der Königl. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin für das Jahr 1791 ausgesetzte Preisfrage: Welches sind die wirklichen Fortschritte, die die Metaphysik seit Leibnizens und Wolffs Zeiten in Deutschland gemacht hat?, in: Werkausgabe in 12 Bänden, hrsg. v. Wilhelm Weischedel, Bd. 6: Schriften zur Metaphysik und Logik 2, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1977, pp. 587-676.
  7. - Kolmer 1998: Petra Kolmer, Philosophiegeschichte als philosophisches Problem; kritische Überlegungen namentlich zu Kant und Hegel, Karl Alber, Freiburg-München 1998.
  8. - Motroˇsilova 1986: Nelli Motroˇsilova (Hrsg.), Studien zur Geschichte der westlichen Philosophie: Elf Arbeiten jüngerer sowjetischer Autoren, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main 1986.

  • Valentin Asmus’s historico-philosophical articles in the journal “Pod znamenem marksizma”: between philosophy and ideology Elena V. Besschetnova, in Studies in East European Thought /2023 pp.589
    DOI: 10.1007/s11212-023-09548-8

Evert van der Zweerde, Soviet Theory of the History of Philosophy as Capstone of Soviet Philosophical Culture in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 2/2018, pp 357-371, DOI: 10.3280/SF2018-002011