Aporie nella storia della psicoanalisi

Journal title PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE
Author/s Mauro Fornaro, Secondo Giacobbi
Publishing Year 2001 Issue 2001/1
Language Italian Pages 32 P. File size 80 KB
DOI
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Aporie nella storia della psicoanalisi ABSTRACT: Summary. The Authors propose to think again the history of psychoanalysis following the development of a series of aporias. They are couples of opposite concepts that, arising from some puzzling questions, have recurrently appeared in the historical span of this discipline and are the matter of controversies and breaks within the psychoanalytical community. The Authors put forward a draft accomplishment of the proposed programme, crossing some key moments of the main psychoanalytic trends along the lines of the couples: real trauma/imaginary trauma; internal/external; drive/object; division/cohesion; Ego primacy/Id primacy; oedipal/preoedipal; construction/reconstruction; one-person clinic/two-persons clinic; neutrality/empathy. Consequently, an unexpected image of psychoanalysis appears: giving up the claim to erect this discipline as a monolithical construction, these aporias, unavoidable but fruitful, point out a mainly dialectical way of going on, Freud already used, i.e. a way characterized by conceptual oscillations, that are pursuing and developing sometimes a solution, sometimes the opposite one.

Mauro Fornaro, Secondo Giacobbi, Aporie nella storia della psicoanalisi in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 1/2001, pp , DOI: