Harrison’s comments on the commentaries
Journal title RICERCA PSICOANALITICA
Author/s Harrison Alexandra Murray
Publishing Year 2012 Issue 2012/3 Language Italian
Pages 6 P. 59-64 File size 224 KB
DOI 10.3280/RPR2012-003007
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation
click here
Below, you can see the article first page
If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits
FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.
The author briefly replies to the comments received and identifies the three main issues that in her opinion are the most relevant: the importance of the context, the subject’s development and the clinical implications of her therapeutic model. After acknowledging the validity of some arguments and discussing them, the author reasserts and confirms her position. The most articulated discussion concerns Roggero’s criticism on the emergence of the subject as the expression of a self-determination that does not come from the external world. Harrison thinks that selfdetermination takes place when the patient moves beyond his relation to the analyst and changes something in his original widest context.
Keywords: Therapeutic action, theory of development, sandwich model, micro-processes, micro-analysis, non-verbal meanings
Harrison Alexandra Murray, Le risposte in "RICERCA PSICOANALITICA" 3/2012, pp 59-64, DOI: 10.3280/RPR2012-003007