Tourism finality and allocation of risk of impossibility of performance

Journal title RIVISTA ITALIANA DI DIRITTO DEL TURISMO
Author/s Lorena Ambrosini
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2014/12
Language Italian Pages 14 P. 269-282 File size 141 KB
DOI 10.3280/DT2014-012002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In organised tourism agreements, the practical purpose is supplemented by the reasons for tourism itself. This has the consequence that there is the impossibility of appropriate performance to discharge ones duty in the event that the tourism purpose is unable to be realised. When the omission to provide the holiday is not ascribable to any of the parties, this poses an issue regarding the assignment of the risk originating from such impossibility. Such assignment seems particularly controversial when the events are ascribable to the creditor’s "subjective" realm (for example, the tourist’s sickness or death). Current legal guidance seems to point toward to risk always falling upon the organiser and, consequently, the tourist would not be held to make any payment. However, the answer is unclear, as other opinions emphasise how the same organiser is unable to bear the burden of any unexpected event. In the search for a middle ground, there is the suggestion of the similar application of the laws related to tenders or the maritime transport passenger’s impediment; however, their connection seems doubtful. The return of the "expenses" sustained by the organiser, without specifying the legal ground, does not satisfy the jurisprudential answers aimed at acknowledging such return. Additional pretexts are searched for in the provisions that govern contract resolution in the event of the partial impossibility of the service; however, the solution seems difficult to sustain where the creditor-tourist interest is unable to be fulfilled, not even partially. The answer is able to be found on second reading of the laws that govern restitution duties in the event of the service’s impossibility; this with the belief that the action of undue repetition is a full legal remedy (also able to be tried in the event of a duty to carry out a deed), the organiser would be able to be paid an indemnity commensurate with the services carried out up to the time of the event bringing about the impossibility.

  • Disclosure of the Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book of Listed Banks Cinzia Baldan, Francesco Zen, in SSRN Electronic Journal /2006
    DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2152894

Lorena Ambrosini, Finalità turistica e allocazione del rischio di impossibilità della prestazione in "RIVISTA ITALIANA DI DIRITTO DEL TURISMO" 12/2014, pp 269-282, DOI: 10.3280/DT2014-012002