Crisis and change of public accounting institutions. The case of central state administrations

Journal title MANAGEMENT CONTROL
Author/s Vania Palmieri, Mario Turco
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/3
Language Italian Pages 26 P. 87-112 File size 384 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2020-003005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The literature on public accounting and management traditionally payed consid-erable attention to the programming, planning and reporting of the use of economic and financial resources. However, the effects that exogenous shocks - such as the first big financial, economic and fiscal crisis of the 21st century - exert on public finance and accounting institutions need to be better explored. In an attempt to fill this gap, this piece of research focuses on the case of Italian central state ad-ministrations, adopting the historical institutionalists’ theoretical framework about immediate and gradual institutional change. It relies on a documental analysis car-ried out on the main regulatory innovations introduced since the outbreak of the crisis to 2019, and on one author’s direct observation of the rules and systems placed at the centre of the study. What emerges is that, in the period of reference, the explored institutions considerably changed, and that their change only partially depended on the crisis. Specifically, the latter entered a process of gradual and in-cremental change that was already under way, triggering two main (European) reactions. The first one had the character of immediacy, while the other that of graduality. The evidence of the dynamism and non-static nature of the institutions of interest allows reflecting on relevant practical implications.

Keywords: Public finance and accounting, Institutional change, Economic and fiscal crisis, State planning and budgeting

  1. Andriani Y., Kober R., Ng J. (2010), Decision usefulness of cash and accrual information: public sector managers’ perceptions, Australian Accounting Review, 20(2), pp.144-153.
  2. Anessi Pessina E. (2014), L’Evoluzione dei Sistemi Contabili Pubblici. Aspetti Critici nella Prospettiva Aziendale, Milano, Egea.
  3. Anessi‐Pessina E., Steccolini I. (2005), Evolutions and limits of new public management –inspired budgeting practices in Italian local governments. Public Budgeting & Finance, 25(2), pp. 1-14.
  4. Anselmi L. (2009), I Principi Contabili Internazionali per le Amministrazioni Pubbliche Italiane, Milano, Giuffrè.
  5. Bellanca S., Vandernoot J. (2014), International public sector accounting standards (IPSAS) implementation in the European Union (EU) member states, Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 10(3), pp. 257-269. DOI: 10.17265/1548-6583/2014.03.001
  6. Borgonovi E. (2001), Il concetto di valore pubblico, Azienda Pubblica, 14(2/3), pp. 185-188.
  7. Borgonovi E., Mussari R. (2011), Pubblico e privato: Armonizzare gli opposti, Azienda Pubblica, 2, pp. 103-121.
  8. Bouckaert G. (2012), Trust and public administration, Administration, 60(1), pp. 91-115.
  9. Bouckaert G., Peters B. G., Verhoest K. (2010), The Coordination of Public Sector Organizations, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
  10. Bowen G. A. (2009), Document analysis as a qualitative research method, Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), pp. 27-40. DOI: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
  11. Brancasi A. (2012), L’introduzione del principio del cd pareggio di bilancio: un esempio di revisione affrettata della Costituzione, Quaderni Costituzionali, 32(1), pp. 108-110. DOI: 10.1439/36557
  12. Brusca I., Martínez J. C. (2016), Adopting international public sector accounting standards: a challenge for modernizing and harmonizing public sector accounting, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(4), pp. 724-744. DOI: 10.1177/0020852315600232
  13. Bryson J. M., Crosby B. C., Bryson J. K. (2009), Understanding strategic planning and the formulation and implementation of strategic plans as a way of knowing: the contributions of actor-network theory, International Public Management Journal, 12(2), pp. 172-207. DOI: 10.1080/10967490902873473
  14. Caivano M., Rodano L., Siviero S. (2010), La trasmissione della crisi finanziaria globale all’economia italiana: un’indagine controfattuale, 2008-2010, Banca d’Italia - Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers), 64.
  15. Campbell J. L. (2010), Institutional reproduction and change, in Morgan G., Campbell J. L., Crouch C., Pedersen O. K., Whitley R., eds, The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis, pp. 87-115, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  16. Cantu E. (2012), Il sistema di contabilità economico-patrimoniale nel settore pubblico, in Rota S., Sicilia M., Steccolini I., a cura di, Bilancio e Misurazione della Performance nelle Amministrazioni Pubbliche, pp. 147-194, Santarcangelo di Romagna, Maggioli Editore
  17. Caperchione E. (2000), Sistemi Informativo Contabili nella Pubblica Amministrazione: Profili Comparati, Evoluzione e Criteri per la Progettazione, Milano, Egea.
  18. Caperchione E. (2003), Local government accounting system reform in Italy: a critical analysis, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 15(1), pp. 110-145. DOI: 10.1108/JPBAFM-15-01-2003-B007
  19. Caperchione E. (2012), L’armonizzazione contabile nella prospettiva internazionale, Azienda Pubblica, 1, pp. 83-99.
  20. Capoccia G. (2015), Critical junctures and institutional change, in Mahoney J., Thelen K., eds, Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, pp. 147-179, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  21. Capoccia G., Kelemen R. D. (2007), The study of critical junctures: theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism, World Politics, 59(3), pp. 341-369. DOI: 10.1017/S0043887100020852
  22. Carey G., Kay A., Nevile A. (2019), Institutional legacies and “sticky layers”: what happens in cases of transformative policy change?, Administration & Society, 51(3), pp. 491-509. DOI: 10.1177/0095399717704682
  23. Carlin T. M. (2005), Debating the impact of accrual accounting and reporting in the public sector, Financial Accountability & Management, 21(3), pp. 309-336.
  24. Cepiku D., Giordano F., Bonomi Savignon A. (2018), Does strategy rhyme with austerity?, Public Management Review, 20(3), pp. 421-443. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2017.1285116
  25. Cepiku D., Mussari R., Giordano F. (2016), Local governments managing austerity: approaches, determinants and impact, Public Administration, 94(1), pp: 223-243.
  26. Christensen T., Lægreid P. (2007), The whole‐of‐government approach to public sector reform, Public Administration Review, 67(6), pp. 1059-1066.
  27. Christensen T., Lægreid P., Rykkja L. H. (2016), Organizing for crisis management: building governance capacity and legitimacy, Public Administration Review, 76(6), pp. 887-897.
  28. Cothran D. A. (1993), Entrepreneurial budgeting: an emerging reform?, Public Administration Review, 53(5), pp. 445-454. DOI: 10.2307/976345
  29. Diamond J. (2002), Performance budgeting – is accrual accounting required?, International Monetary Fund Working Paper.
  30. Dickmann R. (2012), Legislazione di spesa ed equilibrio di bilancio tra legittimità costituzionale e legittimità europea, Federalismi.it, 10, pp. 1-8.
  31. Dougherty M. J., Klase K. A. (2009), Fiscal retrenchment in state budgeting: revisiting cutback management in a new era, International Journal of Public Administration, 32(7), pp. 593-619. DOI: 10.1080/01900690902952156
  32. Farneti G. (2004), Ragioneria Pubblica. Il “Nuovo” Sistema Informativo delle Aziende Pubbliche, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  33. Fernandes C. A. L., Mota P. R. (2011), The roots of the Eurozone sovereign debt crisis: PIGS vs non-PIGS, Panoeconomicus, 58(5), pp. 631-649. DOI: 10.2298/PAN1105631F
  34. Guo H., Neshkova M. (2018), Fiscal severity and the choice of budget gap closing strategies, Public Money & Management, 38(4), pp. 305-314. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2018.1450913
  35. Hood C. (1991), A public management for all seasons?, Public Administration, 69(1), pp. 3-19.
  36. Hood C. (1995), The “new public management” in the 1980s: variations on a theme, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2-3), pp. 93-109. DOI: 10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W
  37. Joyce P. G. (2005), Linking performance and budgeting: opportunities in the federal budget process, in Kamensky J. M.., Morales A., eds, Managing for Results, pp. 83-140, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  38. Kaufmann F. X., editor, (2015), The Public Sector: Challenge for Coordination and Learning, Berlin, Walter de Gruyter & Co.
  39. Kelly J., Wanna J. (2000), New public management and the politics of government budgeting, International Public Management Review, 1(1), pp. 33-55.
  40. Kickert W., Randma-Liiv T. (2017), The politics of cutback management in thirteen European countries: statistical evidence on causes and effects, Public Management Review, 19(2), pp. 175-193. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1148193
  41. Kickert W. J., Randma-Liiv T., Savi R. (2015), Politics of fiscal consolidation in Europe: A comparative analysis, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(3), pp. 562-584. DOI: 10.1177/0020852314564312
  42. Kickert W. J., Van der Meer F. B. (2011), Small, slow, and gradual reform: what can historical institutionalism teach us?, International Journal of Public Administration, 34(8), pp. 475-485. DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2011.583768
  43. Kim Y., Chen G. (2020), Cutback management and path dependency: evidence from the two recent recessions, Local Government Studies, 46(2), pp. 278-305. DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2019.1677624
  44. Kluvers R. (2001), An analysis of introducing program budgeting in local government. Public Budgeting & Finance, 21(2), pp. 29-45. DOI: 10.1111/0275-1100.00048
  45. Kuhlmann S. (2010), New public management for the ‘classical continental European administration’: modernization at the local level in Germany, France and Italy, Public Administration, 88(4), pp. 1116-1130.
  46. Lægreid P., Sarapuu K., Rykkja L. H., Randma-Liiv T. (2015), New coordination challenges in the welfare state, Public Management Review, 17(7), pp. 927-939. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1029344
  47. Lapavitsas C., ed (2012), Crisis in the Eurozone, London, Verso Books.
  48. Lapsley I., Mussari R., Paulsson G. (2009), On the adoption of accrual accounting in the public sector: a self-evident and problematic reform, European Accounting Review, 18(4), pp. 719-723. DOI: 10.1080/09638180903334960
  49. Ling T. (2002), Delivering joined-up government in the UK: dimensions, issues and problems, Public Administration, 80(4), pp. 615-642. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.00321
  50. Lynch T. D., Sun J., Smith R. W. (2017), Public Budgeting in America – Sixth Edition, Irvine, Melvine & Leigh Publishers.
  51. Mahoney J., Thelen K. (2010), A theory of gradual institutional change, in Mahoney J., Thelen K., eds, Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, pp. 1-37, Cambridge University Press.
  52. Manes-Rossi F. M., Cohen S., Caperchione E., Brusca I. (2016a), Harmonizing public sector accounting in Europe: thinking out of the box, Public Money & Management, 36(3), pp. 189-196. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1133976
  53. Manes-Rossi F., Cohen S., Caperchione E., Brusca I. (2016b). Introduction: the Gordian knot of public sector accounting and the role of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards, International Review of Administrative Sciences, pp. 718-723. DOI: 10.1177/0020852316665048
  54. Mayntz R. (2012), Crisis and Control: Institutional Change in Financial Market Regulation, Francoforte, Campus Verlag.
  55. Miller G. J., Hildreth W. B., Rabin J., eds (2018), Performance-Based Budgeting: An ASPA Classic, New York, Routledge.
  56. Moore M. H. (1995), Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
  57. Mussari R. (2014), EPSAS and the unification of public sector accounting across Europe, Accounting, Economics and Law, 4(3), pp. 299-312.
  58. RGS (2013), L’Attuazione del Principio Costituzionale del Pareggio di Bilancio. Legge 243 del 2012. Legge n. 39 del 2011, Roma.
  59. Olson O., Humphrey C., Guthrie J. (1998), International experiences with ‘New’ public financial management (NPFM) reforms: new world? Small world? Better world?, in Olson O., Humphrey C., Guthrie J., eds, Global Warning – Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management, Oslo, Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
  60. Ongaro E., Valotti G. (2008), Public management reform in Italy: Explaining the implementation gap, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), pp. 174-204. DOI: 10.1108/09513550810855654
  61. Osborne S. P. (2006), The new public governance?, Public Management Review, 8(3), pp. 377-387. DOI: 10.1080/14719030600853022
  62. Osborne S. P. (2010), The New Public Governance. Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance, London, Routledge.
  63. Panozzo F. (2000), Management by decree. Paradoxes in the reform of the Italian public sector, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 16(4), pp. 357-373. DOI: 10.1016/S0956-5221(00)00012-9
  64. Patrick S., Brown K. (2007), Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts? Assessing “Whole of Government” Approaches to Fragile States, New York, International Peace Academy.
  65. Pavan A, Reginato E. (2012), Programmazione e Controllo nello Stato e nelle Altre Amministrazioni Pubbliche. Gestione per Obiettivi e Contabilità Integrata, Milano, Giuffrè.
  66. Perez R. (2012), Dal bilancio in pareggio all’equilibrio tra entrate e spese. Giornale di Diritto Amministrativo, 10, pp. 929-933.
  67. Persson T., Parker C. F., Widmalm S. (2017), Social trust, impartial administration and public confidence in EU crisis management institutions, Public Administration, 95(1), pp. 97-114.
  68. Peters B. G. (2011), Governance responses to the fiscal crisis – comparative perspectives, Public Money & Management, 31(1), pp: 5-80. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2011.545551
  69. Peters B. G., Pierre J., King D. S. (2005), The politics of path dependency: political conflict in historical institutionalism, The Journal of Politics, 67(4), pp. 1275-1300.
  70. Piatak J. S. (2019), Weathering the storm: the impact of cutbacks on public employees, Public Personnel Management, 48(1), pp. 97-119. DOI: 10.1177/0091026018801044
  71. Pierson P. (2000), Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics, American Political Science Review, 94(2), pp. 251-267. DOI: 10.2307/2586011
  72. Pierson P. (2004), Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  73. Pollitt C. (2010), Cuts and reforms – public services as we move into a new era, Society and Economy, 32(1), pp. 17-31.
  74. Pollitt C., Bouckaert G. (2011), Public Management Reform_ A Comparative Analysis - New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, New York, Oxford University Press.
  75. Raudla R., Savi R., Randma-Liiv T. (2015), Cutback management literature in the 1970s and 1980s: taking stock. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(3), pp. 433-456. DOI: 10.1177/0020852314564313
  76. Redburn F. S. (1993), How should the government measure spending? The uses of accrual accounting, Public Administration Review, pp. 228-236.
  77. Redburn F. S., Shea R. J., Buss T. F., Quintanilla E., eds, (2008), Performance Management and Budgeting: How Governments Learn from Experience, New York, Routledge.
  78. RGS (2010), Garantire la Corretta Programmazione e la Rigorosa Gestione delle Risorse Pubbliche, Roma.
  79. RGS (2011), La Modifica della Legge di Contabilità e Finanza Pubblica alla Luce del Nuovo “Semestre Europeo”, Roma.
  80. Robinson M. (2013), Program Classification for Performance-Based Budgeting, Washington, The World Bank.
  81. Rocco P., Thurston C. (2014), From metaphors to measures: observable indicators of gradual institutional change, Journal of Public Policy, pp. 35-62. -- https://www.jstor.org/stable/43864453.
  82. Rubin I. S. (1990), Budget Theory and Budget Practice: Mow Good the Fit?, Public Administration Review, 50(2), pp. 179-189. DOI: 10.2307/976865
  83. Salines M., Glöckler G., Truchlewski Z. (2012), Existential crisis, incremental response: the eurozone's dual institutional evolution 2007-2011, Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5), pp. 665-681. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2011.646777
  84. Schick A. (1966), The road to PPB: the stages of budget reform, Public Administration Review, pp. 243-258. DOI: 10.2307/973296
  85. Schwarzer D. (2012), The euro area crises, shifting power relations and institutional change in the European Union, Global Policy, 3, pp. 28-41. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12013
  86. Shpaizman I. (2014), Ideas and institutional conversion through layering: the case of Israeli immigration policy, Public Administration, 92(4), pp. 1038-1053.
  87. Soverchia M. (2008), L’armonizzazione Contabile delle Amministrazioni Pubbliche. Attori, Processi, Strumenti, Milano, Giuffrè.
  88. Spradley J. P. (2016), Participant Observation, Long Grove, Waveland Press.
  89. Streeck W., Thelen K. (2005), Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies, in W. Streeck, & K. Thelen, eds, Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, pp. 1-39, New York, Oxford University Press.
  90. Thelen K. (1999), Historical institutionalism in comparative politics, Annual Review of Political Science, 2, pp. 369-404.
  91. Thelen K. (2002), The explanatory power of historical institutionalism, in Mayntz, R. editor, Akteure-Mechanismen-Modelle. Zur Theoriefähigkeit Makro-Sozialer Analysen, pp. 91-107, Frankfurt, Campus Verlag.
  92. Thelen K. (2004), How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  93. Thompson F. (1994), Mission-driven, results-oriented budgeting: fiscal administration and the new public management. Public Budgeting & Finance, 14(3), pp. 90-105. DOI: 10.1111/1540-5850.01014
  94. Van der Heijden J. (2011), Institutional layering: a review of the use of the concept. Politics, 31(1), pp. 9-18.
  95. Van der Heijden J. (2017), Looking differently at legal change: layering, conversion, drift, displacement and exhaustion in the development of Dutch construction regulation, RegNet Research Paper, 129.
  96. Van Der Hoek M. P. (2005), From cash to accrual budgeting and accounting in the public sector: the Dutch experience, Public Budgeting & Finance, 25(1), pp. 32-45.
  97. Van der Voet J. (2019), Organizational decline and innovation in public organizations: a contextual framework of cutback management, Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 2(2), pp. 139-154.
  98. Verashchagina A., Capparucci M. (2013), Living through the crisis in Italy, in Karamessini M., Rubery J., eds, Women and Austerity. The Economic Crisis and the Future for Gender Equality, pp. 248-270, London, Routledge.
  99. Vercelli A. (2013), Economy and economics: the twin crises, in Brancaccio E., Fontana G., eds, The Global Economic Crisis, pp. 51-65, London, Routledge.
  100. Verdun A. (2015), A historical institutionalist explanation of the EU’s responses to the euro area financial crisis, Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), pp. 219-237. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2014.994023
  101. Wilenski P. (1986), Public Power and Public Administration, Sydney, Hale & Iremonger.
  102. Yin R. K. (2009), Case Study Research: Desing and Methods (Fourth Edition). Applied Social Research Methods, Volume 5, Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications.

Vania Palmieri, Mario Turco, Crisi e cambiamento delle istituzioni di contabilità pubblica. Il caso delle amministrazioni centrali dello Stato in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 3/2020, pp 87-112, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2020-003005