Opportunities and limits of rescaling sustainability indicators at the municipal scale: reflections from the territorialisation of the Lombardy Regional Strategy for Sustainable Development (SRSvS)

Journal title ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI
Author/s Fulvio Adobati, Mario Paris
Publishing Year 2026 Issue 2026/145
Language Italian Pages 21 P. 28-48 File size 169 KB
DOI 10.3280/ASUR2026-145002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The authors reflect about the role of indicators as a support for the actions of local authorities in the development of sustainability-oriented initiatives, starting from a study on the territorialisation process of the Lombardy SRSvS indicators at the municipal scale. Through a process of participant observation of the policy com-munity involved, they emerge the limitations encountered by the municipal level in working with indicators and some potential roles.

Keywords: SDGs; SRSvS; Lombardy Region; indicators; dashboard.

  1. Adelphi and Urban Catalyst (2015). Sustainable Development Goals and Habitat III: Opportunities for a Successful New Urban Agenda. Cities Alliance. Testo disponibile al sito: www.citiesalliance.org/sites/default/files/Opportunities%20 for%20the%20New%20Urban%20Agenda.pdf (ultimo accesso 14 marzo 2024).
  2. Allen C., Nejdawi R., El-Baba J., Hamati K., Metternicht G. and Wiedmann T. (2017). Indicator-based assessments of progress towards the sustainable development goals (SDGs): a case study from the Arab region. Sustainability Science, 12: 975-989.
  3. Allen C., Metternicht G., Wiedmann T. (2018). Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): a review of evidence from countries. Sustainability Science, 13: 1453-1467.
  4. Annesi N., Battaglia M., Gragnani P. and Iraldo F. (2021). Integrating the 2030 Agenda at the municipal level: Multilevel pressures and institutional shift. Land Use Policy, 105.
  5. Ash A. and Lancione M., eds. (2022). Grammars of the Urban Ground. Durham: Duke University Press.
  6. ASVIS (2020). Rapporto ASviS 2020. I territori e gli obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile. Roma: ASviS.
  7. ASVIS (2021). Rapporto ASviS 2021. L’Italia e gli obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile. Roma: ASviS.
  8. ASVIS (2023). Rapporto ASviS 2023. I territori e gli obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile. Roma: ASviS.
  9. Beck S., Jasanoff S., Stirling A. and Polzin C. (2021). The governance of sociotechnical transformations to sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 49: 143-152.
  10. Blewitt J. (2012). Understanding Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
  11. Bollen F. (2001). Capacity building for integration. managing EU structural funds: effective capacity for implementation as a prerequisite. Maastricht: Eipa.
  12. Campagnolo L., Carraro C., Eboli F. and Farnia L.L. (2015). Assessing SDGs: A New Methodology to Measure Sustainability. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) Working paper, 89.
  13. Cavalli L., Alibegovic M., Farnia L. e Nuccitelli F. (2021). Verso la sostenibilità. Uno strumento a supporto delle regioni. Agg. 2021. Roma, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei. Testo disponibile al sito: www.feem.it/m/publications_ pages/181221-rpt-regional.pdf (ultimo accesso 15 marzo 2024).
  14. Corbetta P. (2015). La ricerca sociale: metodologie e tecniche. Le tecniche quantitative. Bologna: il Mulino.
  15. Dasgupta S. and Tam E.K.L. (2005). Indicators and framework for assessing sustainable infrastructure, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 32(1): 30-44.
  16. De Munck V.C. and Sobo E.J., eds. (1998). Using methods in the field: a practical introduction and casebook. Lanham: AltaMira Press.
  17. Erlandson D.A., Harris E.L., Skipper B.L. and Allen S.D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. New York: Sage.
  18. EC – European Community (2004). Enlargement of the European Union Guide to the Negotiations Chapter by Chapter. Luxembourg: Office of Official Publications of European Communities.
  19. Escobar A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse. Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/978082237181
  20. EEA – European Environment Agency (2021). Urban sustainability in Europe – A stakeholder-led process. Copenhagen: EEA.
  21. Ferguson J. (2015). Give A Man A Fish. Reflections on the New Politics of Distribution. Durham: Duke University Press.
  22. Ferrucci L. (2019). Modelli di corporate governance e varietà evolutiva delle imprese. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  23. Frare M.B., Clauberg A.P.C., Sehnem S., Campos L.M.S. and Spuldaro J. (2020) Toward a sustainable development indicators system for small municipalities. Sustainable Development, 28: 1148-1167.
  24. Hughes J., Sasse G. and Gordon C. (2004). Conditionality and compliance in the EU’s eastward enlargement: regional policy and the reform of sub-national government. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42: 523-551.
  25. Jasanoff S. (2020). Ours Is the Earth: Science and Human History in the Anthropocene. Journal of the Philosophy of History, 14(3): 337-358. DOI: 10.1163/18722636-1234144
  26. JRC European Union (2020). European Handbook for SDG Voluntary Local Reviews. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Testo disponibile al sito: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/ JRC118682 (ultimo accesso 14 marzo 2024).
  27. Lafortune G., Woelm F. and Valentini R. (2022). Towards a Sound Measure of Government Efforts and Commitments for the SDGs? SDSN Working Paper. Paris (F): SDSN. Testo disponibile al sito: https://irp.cdnwebsite.com/be6d1d56/files/uploaded/SDSN_Policy%20Tracker_WP_final_checked.pdf (ultimo accesso 12/03/2024).
  28. Le Blanc D. (2015). Towards Integration at Last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a Network of Targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3): 176-187.
  29. Maggino F. e Alaimo L.S. (2020). Misurare lo sviluppo sostenibile: un esercizio complesso. EyesReg, 10(4): 1-9.
  30. Marshall C. and Rossman G.B. (1989). Designing qualitative research. New York: Sage.
  31. Watson V. (2016). Locating planning in the New Urban Agenda of the urban sustainable development goal. Planning Theory, 15(4): 435-448. DOI: 10.1177/147309521666078
  32. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare (2017). Strategia Nazionale per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile. Testo disponibile al sito: www.mase. gov.it/pagina/la-snsvs (ultimo accesso 12 marzo 2024).
  33. Montalto V. (2021). Cultura per lo sviluppo sostenibile: misurare l’immisurabile? Bologna: Fondazione Unipolis.
  34. Nardo M., Saisana M., Saltelli A. and Tarantola S. (2005). Tools for Composite Indicators Building. JRC31473. Bruxelles: European Communities.
  35. Nazioni Unite – Assemblea Generale (2015). Risoluzione A/RES/70/1 “Trasformare il nostro mondo: l’Agenda 2030 per lo sviluppo sostenibile”. Testo disponibile al sito: https://unric.org/it/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/11/ Agenda-2030-Onu-italia.pdf (ultimo accesso 12 marzo 2024).
  36. OECD (2016). Measuring distance to the SDGs targets: a pilot assessment of where OECD countries stand. Paris: OECD. Testo disponibile al sito: www. oecd.org/wise/measuring-distance-to-the-sdgs-targets.htm (ultimo accesso 12 marzo 2024).
  37. OECD (2020). A Territorial Approach to the Sustainable Development Goals. Paris: OECD.
  38. Ostrom E. (1990). Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051180776
  39. Paris M. (2021). Funzionari pubblici come agenti di rigenerazione urbana. Prospettive di lavoro a partire dall’esperienza di CM di Milano. In: Caruso N., Pasqui G., Tedesco C. e Vassallo I., a cura di, Rigenerazione dello spazio urbano e trasformazione sociale. Atti della XXIII Conferenza Nazionale SIU DOWNSCALING, RIGHTSIZING. Contrazione demografica e riorganizzazione spaziale, Torino, 17-18 giu. 2021. Roma-Milano: Planum Publisher. DOI: 10.53143/PLM.C.52
  40. Pezzagno M., Frigione B.M. e Richiedei A. (2021). Per un monitoraggio dell’agenda 2030 in Italia. Un approccio multiscalare alla territorializzazione degli obiettivi di sviluppo sostenibile. Brescia, Brixia University Press.
  41. Polski M.M. and Ostrom E. (1999). An institutional framework for policy analysis and design. Paper on Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis Department of Political Science. Bloomington Indiana: Indiana University Press.
  42. Risso A., Arzà C. e Lonati M.G. (2020). Essere e comunicare la sostenibilità. Working papers. Rivista online di Urban@it, 2: 1-10. Testo disponibile al sito: www.urbanit.it/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/BP_Risso_et-al.pdf (ultimo accesso 15 marzo 2024).
  43. Richiedei A. and Pezzagno M. (2022). Territorializing and Monitoring of Sustainable Development Goals in Italy: An Overview. Sustainability, 14: 3056.
  44. Schmidt-Traub G., Kroll C., Teksoz K., Durand-Delacre D. and Sachs J.D. (2017). National baselines for the Sustainable Development Goals assessed in the SDG Index and Dashboards. Nature Geoscience, 10: 547-555.
  45. Singh A.K. (2025). Quantitative Assessment of Sustainability and Sustainable Development. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-83852-1_
  46. Stiglitz J.E., Fitoussi J.P. and Durand M. (2018). Beyond GDP. Measuring what counts for economic and social performance. Paris: OECD.
  47. UCLG (2021). Towards the localization of the SDGs. Sustainable and Resilient Recovery Driven by Cities and Territories (5th REPORT). Barcellona: UCLG.
  48. UN-Habitat (2022). Integrating the SDGs in Urban Project Design. Recommendations from the Global Future Cities Programme. Nairobi: UNO.
  49. Unger E.M., Rihan B., Lemmen C., de Zeeuw K., Zevenbergen J., Teo C. and Crompvoets J. (2020) Global policy transfer for land administration and disaster risk management. Land Use Policy, 99, 104834.

Fulvio Adobati, Mario Paris, Opportunità e limiti del rescaling degli indicatori di sostenibilità alla scala comunale: riflessioni a partire dalla territorializzazione della SRSvS di Regione Lombardia in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 145/2026, pp 28-48, DOI: 10.3280/ASUR2026-145002