Regional-themed board games and teacher training: An experience in Molise

Journal title EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING
Author/s Filippo Bruni, Michela Nisdeo
Publishing Year 2026 Issue 2026/1
Language Italian Pages 14 P. 83-96 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/exioa1-2026oa23219
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The article analyses the role of board games in teacher training, with particular reference to a specific type of game: those with a regional theme. Play is considered a fundamental dimension of human experience and an effective learning tool, capable of fostering engagement, experimentation and knowledge construction. In recent years, alongside video games, there has been a renewed interest in board games, appreciated for their transparency, adaptability and relational dimension in face-to-face settings. The experience described concerns a university workshop, held at the University of Molise, in which 48 female students experienced two regionally themed games: the Tombola geografica del Molise and Molise. Ma tu… a chi appartien’?. The experience falls within the framework of Game-Based Learning (GBL), using authentic games rather than inserting game elements into non-game contexts. Through a questionnaire, views, perceptions, play practices and educational potential were investigated. The results show a very positive attitude towards play, considered by all participants to be a learning tool. Both games were rated as engaging and easily understandable, and usable for educational purposes in primary school. Despite the limitations of the small sample and exploratory nature, the study highlights the value of board games as didactic tools, with specific potential in relation to the teaching of history and geography at a regional level, and underlines the need to develop further experiences and projects in the educational field.

Keywords: board games;Molise;teacher training;game-based learning

  1. Andreoletti M., & Tinterri A. (2023). Apprendere con i giochi. Esperienze di progettazione ludica. Carocci.
  2. Baumgartner E. (2010). Il gioco dei bambini. Carocci, Roma.
  3. Calleja G. (2022). Unboxed: Board game experience and design. MIT Press, Cambridge (Massachusets).
  4. Costikyan G. (2002, January). I have no words & I must design: Toward a critical vocabulary for games. In Computer Games and Digital Cultures Conference Proceedings.
  5. Csikszentmihalyi M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper, New York.
  6. Deterding S., Dixon D., Khaled R., & Nacke L. (2011, September). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification”. In: Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9-15).
  7. Heidt J. (2026). La generazione ansiosa. Come i social hanno rovinato i nostri figli. Rizzoli, Milano.
  8. Jenkins H. (2010). Culture partecipative e competenze digitali: Media education per il XXI secolo. Guerini, Milano.
  9. Kapp K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: game-based meth-ods and strategies for training and education. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (NJ).
  10. Mandryk R. L., & Maranan D. S. (2002, April). False prophets: exploring hybrid board/video games. In CHI’02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 640-641).
  11. Mayer R. E. (2019). Computer games in education. Annual review of psychology, 70(1), 531-549.
  12. Plass J. L., Homer B. D., & Kinzer C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational psychologist, 50(4), 258-283.
  13. Prensky M. (2007). Digital Game-Based Learning. Paragon House, Saint Paul (Minnesota).
  14. Rey P. J. (2012). Gamification, playbor & exploitation. The Society Pages. <a href="http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2012/10/15/gamification-playbor-exploitation-2">http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2012/10/15/gamification-playbor-exploitation-2</a>.
  15. Rogerson M. J., & Gibbs M. (2018). Finding time for tabletop: Board game play and parenting. Games and Culture, 13(3): 280-300.
  16. Sala G., & Gobet F. (2016). Do the benefits of chess instruction transfer to academic and cognitive skills? A meta-analysis. Educational research review, 18: 46-57.
  17. Salvador M. (2015). In gioco e fuori gioco: Il ludico nella cultura e nei media contemporanei. Mimesis, Milano-Udine.
  18. Tinterri A., Pelizzari F., Basta A., & Dipace A. (2024). Allineare obiettivi ludici e di apprendimento. Verso un framework unitario per il Game-Based Learning. Nuova Secondaria, 42(2): 249-268.
  19. Tonioni F. (2011). Quando internet diventa una droga. Ciò che i genitori devono sapere. Einaudi, Torino.
  20. Wittgenstein L. (1963). Philosophical investigations. Blackwell (Opera originale pubblicata nel 1953). Trad. it.: Wittgenstein, L. (1974). Ricerche filosofiche (R. Piovesan & M. Trinchero, Trad.). Torino: Einaudi.
  21. Zimmermann E. (2014). Manifesto for a ludic century. In: S. P. Walz & S. Detering (Eds.), The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications. Cambridge (Massa-chusets): MIT Press.

Filippo Bruni, Michela Nisdeo, Giochi da tavolo a tema regionale e formazione de-gli insegnanti: una esperienza in Molise in "EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING" 1/2026, pp 83-96, DOI: 10.3280/exioa1-2026oa23219