Personality disorders from a psychodynamic perspective

Author/s y Ballarà Francesco Castellet
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/2 Language Italian
Pages 12 P. 17-28 File size 543 KB
DOI 10.3280/PSOB2014-002002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

After an initial clarification of the meaning of crucial concepts such as Personality, Identity and Self that pertain to different realms but are also close one to another, the Author specifies how only the Self is a truly psychoanalytic concept. Furthermore the Author provides a discussion of the widespread and abusive use of the DSM in the field of the mental health despite the evident failures and limitation of its use on the field of clinical setting due to its categorial structured approach to the diagnosis. A failure implicitly admitted with the abandonment of the multi axial diagnosis in the recently delivered last revision: the DSM 5. In fact a functional vs. categorial diagnosis is the only diagnostic method compatible with the current psychodynamic view of the human mind/soul. The functional diagnosis privileges a view of mental pain and illness as distributed along a spectrum from normality to pathology where the individual with his or her unique life story and personal relations are crucial.

Keywords: Personality Disorders; Psychodynamic Theories; Inter-subjectivity; Self; Multiple Selves; Dissociation; DSM 5.

  1. Allport G.W. (1950; 1970) The Nature of Personality: Selected Papers, Greenwood Press, Westport, CN
  2. Altman N. (2003) “Affect Regulation, Mentalization, and the Development of the Self”, J. Child Psychother., 29: 431-435
  3. Bion W. (1962) Apprendere dall’esperienza, Armando, Roma, 1988
  4. Borgna E. (2013) La dignità ferita, Feltrinelli, Milano
  5. British Psychological Society (2011) Response to the American Psychiatric Association: DSM-5 Development,
  6. Bromberg P. (1998) Standing in the spaces: Essays on clinical process, trauma, and dissociation, Analytic Press, Hillsdale, NY Bucci W. (1997) Psychoanalysis and cognitive science: A multiple code theory, Guilford
  7. Press, New York
  8. Gallese V., Eagle M., Migone P. (2007) “Intentional attunement: The neural underpinnings of interpersonal relations”, J. Am. Psychoan. Ass., 55: 131-176
  9. Insel T.R. (April 29, 2013) Blog post of the Director of the NIMH,
  11. Jung C.G. (1928) “L’Io e l’Inconscio”, in Opere, vol. 7, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 1991
  12. Kandell E. (2012) The age of Insight, Random House, New York
  13. Kaplan & Sadok’s (2009) The Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ed., Philadelphia
  14. Kernberg O.W. (1975) Borderline conditions and patological narcissism, Jason Aronson, New York
  15. Kohut H. (1971) The analysis of the Self, Hogart Press, New York
  16. Kohut H. (1977) The restoration of the Self, Intern. Universit. Press, New York
  17. Lowen A. (1984) Narcissism: Denial of the True Self, Simon & Schuster, New York, 2004
  18. Masterson J.F. (1993) The Emerging Self: A Developmental Self & Object Relations Approach to the Treatment of the Closet Narcissistic Disorder of the Self, Routledge, London
  19. Ogden T.H. (1983) “The Concept of Internal Object Relations”, Int. J. Psycho-Anal., 64: 227-241
  20. Pieri P.F. (1998) Dizionario Junghiano, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino
  21. Sands S. (2009) “The Concept of Multiple Self States: Clinical Advantages”, Int. J. Psychoanal. Self Psychol., 4: 122-124
  22. Slavin M.O. (2013) “Why One Self is Not Enough: Clinical, Existential, and Adaptive Perspectives on Bromberg’s Model of Multiplicity and Dissociation”, Contemp. Psychoan., 49, 3: 380-409
  23. Shore A. (2003) Affect Regulation and the repair of the Self, W.W. Norton & Company, New York-London
  24. Shore A. (2011) “The right brain implicit self lies at the core of psychoanalysis”, Psychoan. Dial., 21: 75-100
  25. Spaemann R. (2005) Persone. Sulla differenza tra “qualcosa” e “qualcuno”, Laterza, Roma-Bari
  26. Stern D. (1985) Il mondo interpersonale del bambino, Armando, Roma, 1987
  27. Storolow R.D., Atwood G.E. (1992) I contesti dell’essere. Le basi intersoggettive della vita psichica, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 1995
  28. Westen D., Shedler J. (2007) “Shedler Westen Assessment Procedure – 200”, J. Pers. Assess., 89: 41-55
  29. Winnicott D.W. (1965) The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment, The Hogart Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, London
  30. Winnicott D.W. (1969) “The use of an object and relating through identifications”, in Playing and reality, Penguin, Middlesex, UK, pp. 101-112 Wolf E. (1985) “The search for confirmation: technical aspects of mirroring”, Psychoan. Inq., 5: 271-82

y Ballarà Francesco Castellet, Il disturbo di personalità secondo una prospettiva psicodinamica in "PSICOBIETTIVO" 2/2014, pp 17-28, DOI: 10.3280/PSOB2014-002002