Family firms in Italy’s productive system: main features, size, territorial distribution

Author/s Giovanni Ferri, Marco Pini, Stefano Scaccabarozzi
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/2 Language Italian
Pages 30 P. 48-77 File size 981 KB
DOI 10.3280/REST2014-002003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

We aim to provide a better and more precise quantification of the family business phenomenon in Italy. Beside its overall importance to the Italian economy, we also seek to offer territorial breakdowns of the family business intensity throughout the country. In this sense, the paper sets out observing that the status of the knowledge on family firms in Italy is gravely unsatisfactory, even more so in light of the quintessential role these firms play in the country’s national economy. In fact, the few available cross country comparisons uncover that family businesses would have the largest share of the national productive system exactly in Italy. The distance between the family business share estimated in Italy and elsewhere is so large to overshadow the possible differences - e.g., those due to calculations based on different methods and definitions, if not purely relying on experts’ opinions - that may make those comparisons not fully reliable. Methods and Results Our method classifies as family business any firm that is either 1) a single individual venture, or 2) a partnership of individuals, or 3) a private limited company in which beyond 50% of the voting shares is held by a single person and/or by family related persons and where, at the same time, a member of the family holds top managing/directors roles in the company or the family, altogether, holds the majority of those roles. Our original exercise consists in applying this method in a very large sample of Italian enterprises. This permits us to quantify that family firms account for some 70% of total employees in the industry and services sectors. We also calculate statistics quantifying the phenomenon on a territorial level, highlighting that, even though generalized, the relevance of family businesses is even more marked in some regions. Finally, we show that, rather than being a sunset type of firms, family businesses are vital protagonists in the formation of new enterprises. Conclusions Our main conclusion is that the difficulties to quantify this phenomenon do not justify the current situation of scant knowledge about family firms, something that, in our view, impairs the political economy debate on this crucial segment of firms. As the Latins would say "primum cognoscere, deinde philosophari" (know first, then judge), we believe ours is a contribution to help put the policy debate back on the right track.

Keywords: Family business, start-up, italian economy, enterprise governance, regional statistics

Jel codes: C8, G32, L21, M13, M14

  1. Astrachan J.H., Carey Shanker M. (2003), Family Businesses’ Contribution to the U.S. Economy: A Closer Look, Family Business Review, XVI, 3, pp. 211-219.
  2. Barca F., Trento S. (1997), La parabola delle partecipazioni statali: una missione tradita. In Barca F. (a cura di), Storia del capitalismo italiano dal dopoguerra a oggi. Roma: Donzelli. Becattini G. (2009), Ritorno al territorio. Bologna: il Mulino.
  3. Bruni L. (2013), La forza dei legami forti. L’impresa familiare come paradigma dell’economia italiana. In Ferri G., Mariani A. (2013), pp. 18-33.
  4. Cennamo C., Berrone P., Cruz C., Gomez-Mejia L.R. (2012), Socioemotional Wealth and Proactive Stakeholder Engagement: Why Family-controlled Firms care more about Their Stakeholders, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 36 (6), pp. 1153-1173.
  5. Colajanni N. (1991), Il capitalismo senza capitale. Milano: Sperling & Kupfer.
  6. Coopseurope (2010), European Cooperatives. Key Statistics,
  7. Corbetta G. (2010), Le aziende familiari. Strategie per il lungo periodo. Milano: Egea.
  8. European Commission – Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General (2009), Final Report of the Expert Group. Overview of Family-business-relevant Issues: Research, Networks, Policy Measures and Existing Studies, November.
  9. Ferri G. (2014), Adattamenti produttivi e relazioni industriali: il successo della codeterminazione in Germania, Sindacalismo, 25, gennaio-marzo, pp. 43-66.
  10. Ferri G., Mariani A. (a cura di) (2013), L’impresa di famiglia nell’economia italiana, Fondazione Telos, Roma, Quaderno n. 32,
  11. Franke S.F., Gregosz D. (2013), The Social Market Economy: What does it really mean?. Tokyo: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
  12. Fukuyama F. (1992), The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
  13. Gagliardi C. (2013), Specificità delle dinamiche occupazionali nelle imprese di famiglia. In Ferri G., Mariani A. (2013), pp. 34-57.
  14. Grazzini E. (2012), Il modello tedesco per la democrazia economica, MicroMega, 5, aprile.
  15. Goody J. (1958), The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups. London: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Hall P.A., Soskice D.W. (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. James H. (2008), Capitalismo familiare. Falck, Haniel, Wendel e il modello di impresa nell’Europa continentale. Milano: Brioschi.
  18. Mandl I. (2008), Overview of Family Business Relevant Issues. Vienna: Austrian Institute for SME Research.
  19. Mauriello D., Pini M. (2012), L’occupazione femminile nel mondo delle imprese: l’evoluzione attesa nel breve termine, Rivista Scuola Democratica, 6, ottobre, pp. 181-190.
  20. Mauriello D., Pitingaro S. Scaccabarozzi S. (2012), Enterprise creation e ciclo economico: caratteristiche e motivazioni dei neoimprenditori. In Economia e società regionale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  21. Mediobanca – Unioncamere (2000), Le medie imprese industriali del Nord-Est (1996-1998). Milano: Ottavio Capriolo.
  22. Miller D., Le Breton-Miller I., Scholnick B. (2008), Stewardship vs. Stagnation: An Empirical Comparison of Small Family and Non-Family Businesses, Journal
  23. of Management Studies, 45 (1), pp. 51-78. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Chrisman J.J., Spence L.J. (2011), Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Salience in Family Firms, Business Ethics Quarterly, 21 (2), pp. 235-255.
  24. Pagano M., Panunzi F. (2003), Il capitalismo familiare: punto di forza o di debolezza? 4 febbraio,
  25. Zamagni V. (1990), Dalla periferia al centro. La seconda rinascita dell’Italia. 1861-1981. Bologna: il Mulino.

  • Family Business in Italy: a Humanistic Transition of Assets and Values from One Generation to the Next Giorgia Nigri, Riccardo Di Stefano, in Humanistic Management Journal /2021 pp.57
    DOI: 10.1007/s41463-020-00085-8
  • Credit rationing and the relationship between family businesses and banks in Italy Giovanni Ferri, Pierluigi Murro, Marco Pini, in Global Finance Journal 100427/2020 pp.100427
    DOI: 10.1016/j.gfj.2018.04.003
  • Piccole imprese e family business: evoluzione, divari territoriali, governance e competitività Marco Pini, Paolo Quirino, in RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO 2/2016 pp.71
    DOI: 10.3280/REST2016-002003

Giovanni Ferri, Marco Pini, Stefano Scaccabarozzi, Le imprese familiari nel tessuto produttivo italiano: caratteristiche, dimensioni, territorialità in "RIVISTA DI ECONOMIA E STATISTICA DEL TERRITORIO" 2/2014, pp 48-77, DOI: 10.3280/REST2014-002003