Università, terza missione e sviluppo economico: le spin-off accademiche italiane

Journal title PRISMA Economia - Società - Lavoro
Author/s Francesca Zanier
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2018/1-2 Language Italian
Pages 23 P. 46-68 File size 300 KB
DOI 10.3280/PRI2018-001004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The socio-economic role of universities towards the local context in which they are embedded can be realized through many channels: offering a good endowment of highly educated and productive people; transferring research content and results through patent licenses and new enterprises; attracting talented human capital and high tech enterprises. The academic creation of new enterprises has attracted much attention in the economic literature, given its recent development and heterogeneity. Understanding the academic spin-off’s nature (origin, potential growth and impact) can help in understanding its role in socio-economic development. In this paper, the attention is focused on Italian academic spin-off which received an accreditation from their university. Empirical results show that the academic spin-offs are mainly "hybrid" companies, with a low need of funding and of managerial skills. The attitude to become a Schumpeterian entrepreneur is not so diffused, even though an evolution towards an entrepreneurial business is present and is accompanied by relevant relations with industrial companies. In terms of sectors, there is coherence with other empirical results: the main sources of knowledge are engineers and ICT. The success of our spin-offs seems to be rooted in the creation of links with other actors, and in the adoption of strategies that are able to connect networks of separate actors. The role in terms of national development the spin-off can play is that of stimulus and counseling, rather than becoming a direct player in production.

Keywords: Third Mission, economic development, academic spin-off

  1. Etzkowitz H., (2014) “The entrepreneurial university wave: From ivory tower to global economic engine”, Industry and Higher Education, 28(4), pp. 223-232
  2. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L., (2000) “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations”, Research Policy
  3. Fadda S., (2016) “Labour coefficients reduction and working time reduction” Argomenti, (4), pp. 67-87
  4. Feldman M., Feller I., Bercovitz J., Burton R., (2002) “Equity and the Technology Transfer Strategies of American Research Universities”, Management Science, 48(1), pp. 105-121.
  5. Fini R., Grimaldi R., Santoni S., Sobrero M., (2011) “Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs”, Research Policy, 40(8), pp. 1113-1127
  6. Etzkowitz H., (2008) The triple helix: university-industry-government innovation in action, Routledge
  7. Etzkowitz H., (2003) “Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university”, Research policy, 32(1), pp. 109-121
  8. Druihle C., Garnsey E., (2004) “Do Academic spin-outs Differ and Does it Matter?”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, pp. 269-285
  9. DjoKovic D., Souitaris V., (2008) “Spinouts from academic institutions: a literature review with suggestions for further research”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, pp. 225-247
  10. Conti G., Granieri M., Piccaluga A., (2012) La gestione del trasferimento tecnologico: strategie, modelli e strumenti, Springer Science & Business Media
  11. Colombo S., (2010) “Università e contesto socio-economico nel Regno Unito. Il contributo della ricerca universitaria allo sviluppo”, Sociologia del lavoro, Vol. 118, pp. 67-79
  12. CNVSU, (2012) XI Rapporto del sullo stato del Sistema Universitario. -- Online: http://www.cnvsu.it
  13. Clark B.R., (2004) “Delineating the Character of the Entrepreneurial University”, Higher Education Policy, Vol. 17, 4, pp. 355-370
  14. Chesbrough H., Vanhaverbeke W., West J., (2006) Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm, Oxford University Press on Demand
  15. Cesaroni F., Conti G., Piccaluga A., (2005) “Technology transfer offices (TTO) in Italian universities: What they do and how they do it.” Paper presentato alla 5th Triple Helix Conference: “The capitalization of knowledge: Cognitive, economic, social and cultural aspects”, Torino, Maggio 18-21
  16. Calza Bini P., (2011) “Quale modello di sviluppo? Un analisi delle dinamiche tra globale e locale”. Economia & diritto agroalimentare, vol. 3, pp. 317-331
  17. Calza Bini P., (2010b) “Introduzione”. In: Fulvio Pellegrini. Sociologia Economica. Contesti, attori, processi, pp. 5-8, Roma, Kappa
  18. Calza Bini P., (2010a) “Quale sviluppo? Quale Locale? Ripensando i sistemi territoriali nel terzo millennio”. Argomenti, vol. 30, pp. 119-147
  19. Calza Bini P., (2001) “Diversità socio territoriali e sistemi di welfare”, Argomenti, vol. 1, pp. 29-42.
  20. Burroni L., Trigilia C., (2011) (a cura di) Le città dell’innovazione. Dove e perché cresce l’alta tecnologia in Italia, Bologna, il Mulino.
  21. Bullock M., (1983) Academic Enterprice, Industrial Innovation and the development of High Technology Financing in the United States, London, Brand Brothers
  22. Bonaccorsi A., (2003) (a cura di) Il sistema della ricerca pubblica in Italia, Milano, FrancoAngeli
  23. Boffo S., Moscati R., (2015) “La Terza Missione dell’università. Origini, problemi e indicatori”, Scuola Democratica, 2, maggio-agosto
  24. Bishop K., D’Este P., Neely A., (2011) “Gaining from interactions with universities: Multiple methods for nurturing absorptive capacity”, Research Policy, V, 40(1), 30-40
  25. Balderi C., Patrono A., Piccaluga A., (2011) “La ricerca pubblica e le sue perle: le imprese spin-off in Italia, Quaderni dell’Istituto di Management
  26. Bagnasco A., (2006) “Imprenditorialità e capitale sociale: il tema dello sviluppo locale”, Stato e mercato, Vol. 78
  27. Bagnasco A., (2004) “Città in cerca di università. Le università regionali e il paradigma dello sviluppo locale”, Stato e Mercato, n. 3, pp. 455-474
  28. ANVUR, (2016) Rapporto biennale sullo stato del Sistema universitario e della ricerca.
  29. ANVUR, (2014) Rapporto sullo stato del sistema universitario e della ricerca 2013, Roma.
  30. Fini R., Grimaldi R., Sobrero M., (2009) “Factors fostering academics to start up new ventures: an assessment of Italian founders’ incentives”, Journal Technology Trasfer, 34, pp. 380-402
  31. Mustar P., Wright M., Clarysse B., (2008) “University spin-off firms: lessons from ten years of experience in Europe”, Science and Public Policy, 35(2), pp. 67-80
  32. Mutti A., (1998) Capitale sociale e sviluppo: la fiducia come risorsa, Bologna, il Mulino
  33. Netval, (2013) Seminiamo ricerca per raccogliere innovazione
  34. Netval, (2014) Unire i puntini per completare il disegno dell’innovazione
  35. Netval, (2015) Protagonisti dell’ecosistema dell’innovazione?
  36. Netval, (2016) Ricerca, valorizzazione dei risultati ed impatti
  37. Netval, (2017) La rete del trasferimento tecnologico si rafforza con la clinica innovation
  38. Nicolaou N., Birley S., (2003) “Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of università spinout”, Journal of Business venturing, Vol. 18, pp. 333-359
  39. Nosella, A., Grimaldi R., (2009). “University-level mechanisms supporting the creation of new companies: an analysis of Italian academic spin-offs”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(6), pp. 679-698
  40. Oakey R., (2003) “Technical entrepreneurship in high technology small firms: some observations on the implications for management”, Technovation, Vol. 23, pp. 679-688
  41. Oakey R., (2007) “Clustering and the R&D management of high‐technology small firms: in theory and practice”. R&D Management, 37(3), pp. 237-248
  42. O’Shea R.P., Allen T.J., Chevalier A., Roche F., (2005) “Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer, and spin-off performance of US Universities”, Research Policy, 34(7), pp. 994-1009.
  43. Orazi F., (2012) “Innovazione tecnologica e governance: il ruolo dell’università nel rilancio delle economie locali”, Sociologia del lavoro, n° 125, pp. 155-173
  44. Piccaluga A., (2001) La valorizzazione della ricerca scientifica: come cambia la ricerca pubblica e quella industriale, FrancoAngeli, Milano
  45. Piccaluga A., Balderi C., (2006) “Consistenza ed Evoluzione delle Imprese Spin-off della Ricerca pubblica in Italia, Laboratorio InSat – Finlombarda
  46. Pirnay F., Surlemont B., Nlemvo F., (2003) “Toward a Typology of University Spin-offs”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 21, pp. 355-369
  47. Ramella F., (2013) Sociologia dell’innovazione economica, il Mulino, Bologna
  48. Ramaciotti L., (2006) Creare valore all’università. Alte tecnologie, creazione d’impresa e nuovo sviluppo locale in Emilia Romagna, FrancoAngeli, Milano
  49. Ramaciotti L., Rizzo U., (2015) “The Determinants of Academic Spin-off Creation by Italian Universities”, R and D Management, 45, pp.501-514
  50. Regini M., (2015) “Conseguenze non previste delle riforme: i mutamenti della governance universitaria in Europa”, Stato e Mercato, 2, Agosto, pp. 159-188
  51. Rostan M., (Ed.) (2011) La professione accademica in Italia: Aspetti, problemi e confronti nel contesto europeo, LED Edizioni Universitarie
  52. Rostan M., Vaira M., (2010) “Gli spin-off universitari in Italia: un possibile contributo allo sviluppo”, Sociologia del lavoro, n°118, p. 55-66
  53. Rothaermel F.T., Agung S.D., Jiang L., (2007). “University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature”. Industrial and corporate change,16(4), pp. 691-791
  54. Schartinger D., Rammera C., Fischer M.M., Fröhlich J., (2002) “Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants”, Research Policy, V, 31, 303-328
  55. Shane S.A., (2004) Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation, Edward Elgar Publishing
  56. Steiner P., (2012) Introduzione alla sociologia economica, Bologna, il Mulino
  57. Trigilia C., (1999) “Capitale sociale e sviluppo locale”, Stato e Mercato, Vol. 19, pp. 419-440
  58. Trigilia C, Burroni L., (2010) Le città dell’innovazione in Italia e in Europa, Rapporto di Artimino sullo Sviluppo Locale
  59. Trigilia C., Ramella F., (a cura di) (2010) Imprese e territori dell’alta tecnologia in Italia, Incontri di Artimino, il Mulino, Bologna
  60. Varaldo R., Di Minin A., (2009). “A new form of entrepreneurial capitalism based on innovation and Research in Italy”, Finmeccanica Occasional Paper
  61. Wright M., Clarysse B., Lockett A., Knockert M., (2008) “Mid-range universities’ in Europe linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries”. Research Policy, V, 37(8), 1205-1223
  62. Zanier F., (2016). “Ricerca Scientifica e fare impresa: Spin-off, Terza Missione e Sviluppo Territoriale. Tesi di Dottorato in Sociologia e Scienze Sociali Applicate, Università degli studi di Roma ‘Sapienza’
  63. Florida R., Cohen, W.M., (1999) “Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development”, in Branscomb L.M., Kodama F., Florid R., (Eds.), Industrializing Knowledge: University-Industry Linkages in Japan and the United States, MIT Press, 589-610
  64. Gherardini A., (2012). “Andante ma non troppo. L’apertura delle università italiane alle imprese”, Stato e mercato, pp. 465-501
  65. Gherardini A., (2015) Squarci nell’avorio. Le università italiane e l’innovazione economica, Firenze University Press
  66. Grandi A., Grimaldi R., (2003) “Exploring the networking characteristics of new ventures founding teams: a study of italian academic spin-off”, Small Business Economics, 21, pp. 329-341
  67. Grandi A., Grimaldi R., (2005) “Academic organizational characteristics and the generation of successful business idea”, Journal of Business Venturing, 20(6), pp 821-845
  68. Grimaldi R., Kenney M., Siegel D.S., Wrigt M., (2011) “30 years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship”, Research Policy, 40, pp. 1045-1057
  69. Guarascio D., Fana M., Cirillo V., (2016) “La crisi e le riforme del mercato del lavoro in Italia: un’analisi regionale del Jobs Act”, Argomenti, (5), pp. 29-56
  70. Guena A., Muscio A., (2009) “The Governance of University Knowledge Transfer: a critical Review of the literature”, Minerva, 47, pp. 93-114
  71. Heirman A., Clarysse B., (2004) Do Intangible Assets and Pre-founding R&D Efforts Matter for Innovation Speed in Start-Ups? Working Paper
  72. Higher Education Funding College of England (HEFCE), (2011) Ref 2014. Assessment Framework, guidance on submissions, -- estratto da http://www.hefce.ac.uk/research/ref/pubs/2011/03_11/
  73. Iacobucci D., Iacopini A., Micozzi A., Orsini S., (2011) “Fostering Entrepreneurship in Academic SpinOffs”, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 12, pp. 513-533
  74. Iacobucci D., Micozzi A., (2015) ‘How to Evaluate the Impact of Academic Spin-Offs on Local Development: An Empirical Analysis of the Italian Case’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 40, pp. 434-452
  75. Iacobucci D., Micozzi, A.. Micucci G., (2013) ‘Gli Spin-off Universitari in Italia: Un quadro del fenomeno e un’analisi della governance e della performance’, L’industria, 34, pp.761-784.
  76. Krabel S., Mueller P., (2009) “What drives scientists to start their own company?: An empirical investigation of Max Planck Society scientists”, Research Policy, 38(6), pp. 947-956
  77. Lawton Smith H., (2007) “Universities, innovation and territorial development: a review of the evidence”, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25, pp. 98-114
  78. Lawton Smith H., (2011) “High technology entreprenuership, universities and the development of the Oxford city-region”, Stato e Mercato, 3, pp. 451-478
  79. Lazzeri F., Piccaluga A., (2012) “Le imprese spin-off della ricerca pubblica: convinzioni, realtà e prospettive future”, Economia e società regionale, 1, pp. 43-65
  80. Lester R. K., (2005) Universities, innovation, and the competitiveness of local economies. Industrial Performance Center Working Paper 05-010, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (December).
  81. Lester R.K., Piore M.J., (2004) Innovation – The Missing Dimension, Harvard University Press
  82. Marra C., Turcio S., (2016) “Insider e outsider nel mercato del lavoro italiano”, Argomenti, 4, pp. 89-134
  83. Moscati R., (2010) (a cura di) Come e perchè cambiano le università in Italia e in Europa. Nuove politiche dell’istruzione superiore e resistenza al cambiamento, Liquori, Napoli
  84. Muscio A., (2008) “Il trasferimento tecnologico in Italia: risultati di un’indagine sui dipartimenti universitari”, L’industria / n.s., a. XXIX
  85. Muscio A., Quaglione D., Vallanti G., (2015) “University regulation and university-industry interaction: a performance analysis of Italian academic departments”, Industrial and Corporate Change, 24, pp.1047-1079
  86. Mustar P., Renault M., Colombo M.G., Piva E., Fontes M., Lockett A., Moray N., (2006) “Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy”, Research Policy, 35(2), pp.289-308
  87. Zanier F., Violante A., (2017) “Le spin-off di ricerca e la loro sopravvivenza, Argomenti, (6), pp. 125-150

Francesca Zanier, Università, terza missione e sviluppo economico: le spin-off accademiche italiane in "PRISMA Economia - Società - Lavoro" 1-2/2018, pp 46-68, DOI: 10.3280/PRI2018-001004