Unemployed people facing future work: analyzing occupational expectations as ‘feasible work

Author/s Didier Demazière, Marc Zune
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/161
Language English Pages 20 P. 173-192 File size 211 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2021-161009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Questo articolo esplora il modo in cui i disoccupati pensano all'occupazione e al lavoro, in un contesto di scarsità di posti e di deterioramento delle condizioni lavorative. L’ipotesi è che, a causa delle incertezze nella ricerca di lavoro, la disoccupazione ridefinisca la relazione dei disoccupati alle norme e agli statuti professionali. L’articolo suggerisce che il concetto di "lavoro fattibile" è utile per teorizzare il modo in cui la disoccupazione modifica le aspettative a proposito di occupazione e di lavoro futuri. L’analisi si basa su 21 interviste approfondite con disoccupati iscritti agli uffici di collocamento pubblici francesi, e alla ricerca di un lavoro autonomo. Questo studio dimostra come la disoccupazione porti a riconsiderare le aspettative occupazionali in risposta alla difficoltà di trovare un lavoro. Dimostra inoltre che la misura in cui i disoccupati aderiscono a queste aspettative conosce delle variazioni importanti in funzione delle risorse biografiche e relazionali dei singoli individui.

Keywords: unemployment, occupational expectations, narratives, France

  1. Abdelnour S. (2013). The Administrative and Political Inception of the ‘Auto-Entrepreneur’ Regime. Sociétés Contemporaines, 89:131-154.
  2. Abraham K.G., Haltiwanger J., Sandusky K. and Spletzer, J.R., (2019). The Consequences of Long-Term Unemployment: Evidence from Linked Survey and Administrative Data. ILR Review, 72(2): 266-299. DOI: 10.1177/001979391879762
  3. Amossé T., Goux D. (2004). Entries and Exits form Self-Employment in France over Last Twenty Years. In: Arum R. and Müller W., a cura di, The Reemergence of Self-Employment. A comparative Study of Self-Employment Dynamics and Inequalities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  4. Bachmann R., Baumgarten D. (2013). How do the unemployed search for a job? Evidence from the EU Labour Force Survey. IZA Journal of European Labour Studies. DOI: 10.1186/2193-9012-2-2
  5. Bakke E.W. (1940). Citizens without Work: A Study of the Effects of Unemployment upon the Worker’s Social Relations and Practices. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  6. Becker H. (2004). Interaction: Some Ideas. Paper presented at the U. Pierre Mendes-France. Grenoble, France.
  7. Blumer H. (1969). Symbolic Interaction: perspective, and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
  8. Boland T., Griffin R. (2015a). The death of unemployment and the birth of job-seeking in welfare policy: governing a liminal experience. Irish Journal of Sociology, 23(2): 29-48. DOI: 10.7227/IJS.23.2.
  9. Boland T., Griffin R. (2015b). The Sociology of Unemployment. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  10. Brand J.E. (2015). The far-reaching impact of job loss and unemployment. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1): 359-375.
  11. Brown D.W. (2000). Job searching in a Labyrinth of Opportunity: The Strategies, the Contacts, the Outcomes. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(2): 227-242.
  12. Bruner J. (1987). Life as Narrrative. Social Research, 54: 11-32.
  13. Burman P. (1990). Killing Time, Losing Ground: Experiences of Unemployment. Toronto: Thompson Educational Pub.
  14. Clasen J., Gould A. (1997). Long-Term Unemployment and the Threat of Social Exclusion. Bristol: Policy Press.
  15. COE (2014). L’évolution des formes d’emploi. Rapport du Conseil d’Orientation de l’Emploi, Paris.
  16. Cottle T.J. (2001). Hardest times: the trauma of long-term unemployment. Amherst: Massachusetts University Press.
  17. Demazière D. (2006). Sociologie des chômeurs. Paris: La Découverte.
  18. Demazière D. (2014). Does unemployment still have a meaning? Findings from a comparison of three conurbations. Sociologie du travail, 56(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soctra.2014.07.006
  19. Demazière D. (2021). Job search success among the formerly unemployed: paradoxically a matter of self-discipline. Critical Policy Studies, 15(2): 192-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2020.1746372
  20. Denzin N. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park: Sage.
  21. Ezzy D. (2000). Fate and Agency in Job Loss Narratives. Qualitative Sociology, 23(1): 121-134. DOI: 10.1023/A:100545970148
  22. Ezzy D. (2001). Narrating Unemployment. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  23. Forster K. (2012). Work, narrative identity and social affiliation. Work, Employment and Society, 26(6): 935-950. DOI: 10.1177/095001701245802
  24. Gabriel Y., Gray D.E., Goregaokar H. (2013). Job loss and its aftermath among managers and professionals: wounded, fragmented and flexible. Work Employment and Society, 27(1): 56-72. DOI: 10.1177/095001701246032
  25. Gallie D., Paugam S., a cura di, (2000). Welfare Regimes and the Experience of Unemployment in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Garrett-Peters R. (2009). “If I don’t have a job anymore, who am I?”: Job loss and collaborative self-concept repair. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38: 547-583. DOI: 10.1177/089124160934210
  27. Goffman E. (1974). Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
  28. Granovetter M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360-80. DOI: 10.1086/22546
  29. Gutierrez-Barbarussa T. (2016). The growth of precarious employment in Europe: Concepts, indicators and the effects of the global economic crisis. International Labour Review, 155(4): 477-508.
  30. Hammer T., Russel H. (2004). Gender Differences in Employment Commitment among Unemployed Youth. In: Gallie D., a cura di, Resisting Marginalization. Unemployment Experience and Social Policy in the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Hipp L. (2016). Insecure times? Workers’ perceived job and labor market security in 23 OECD countries. Social Science Research, 60: 1-14.
  32. ILO (2012). From precarious work to decent work. Outcome document to the workers’ symposium on policies and regulation to combat precarious employment. Geneva: International Labour Office.
  33. Jahoda M. (1982). Employment and Unemployment: A Social-Psychological Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  34. Jahoda M., Lazarsfeld P., Zeisel H. (1972) [1933]. The sociography of an unemployed community: Marienthal. London: Tavistock.
  35. Lahusen C., Giugni M., a cura di, (2016). Experiencing Long-Term Unemployment in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  36. Lindsay C., (2010). In a Lonely Place? Social Networks, Job Seeking and the Experience of Long-Term Unemployment. Social Policy and Society, 9(1), 25-37. DOI: 10.1017/S147474640999017
  37. Lizé L., Prokovas N. (2009). La sortie du chômage: le jeu des mobilités ascendantes et descendantes. Economie appliquée. 62(1): 104-132.
  38. Mead G.H. (1932). Mind Self and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  39. Méda D., Vendramin P. (2013). Des attentes immenses posées sur le travail. In: Méda D., Vendramin P., a cura di, Réinventer le travail. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
  40. Milin K. (2018). CDD, CDI: comment évoluent les embauches et les ruptures depuis 25 ans?. DARES-Analyses, June.
  41. Montgomery J.D. (1994). Weak Ties, Employment, and Inequality: An Equilibrium Analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 99(5): 1212-1236. DOI: 10.1086/23041
  42. OECD (2020). Self-employment rate (indicator).
  43. Patton M.Q. (2014). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  44. Riach K., Loretto W. (2009). Identity work and the “unemployed” worker: age, disability and the lived experience of the older unemployed. Work, Employment and Society, 23(1): 102-119. DOI: 10.1177/095001700809978
  45. Riessman C. (1993). Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
  46. Roberts K. (2016). Unemployment. In: Edgell S., Gottfried H. and Granter E., a cura di, The Sage Handbook of the Sociology of Work and Employment. London: Sage.
  47. Sage D. (2018). Reversing the Negative Experience of Unemployment: A Mediating Role for Social Policies. Social Policy and Administration, 52(5): 1043-1059.
  48. Sharone O. (2007). Constructing unemployed job seekers as professional workers: The depoliticizing work-game of job searching. Qualitative Sociology, 30: 403-416.
  49. Sharone O. (2014). Flawed System/Flawed Self. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  50. Smith V. (2010). Enhancing employability: human, cultural and social capital in an era of turbulent unpredictability. Human Relations, 63(2): 279-303. DOI: 10.1177/001872670935363
  51. Stevens H. (2012) Le régime de l’auto-entrepreneur, une alternative désirable au salariat?. Savoir/Agir, 21(3): 21-28.
  52. Thomas W.I. (1923). The Unadjusted Girl. Boston: Little Brown.
  53. Tutić A., Wiese H. (2015). Reconstructing Granovetter's network theory. Social Networks, 43: 136-148.
  54. Uchitelle L. (2006). The Disposable American: Layoffs and their Consequences. New York: Knopf.
  55. Vallas S. (2015). Accounting for precarity: recent studies of labor market uncertainty. Contemporary Sociology, 44(4): 463-469. DOI: 10.1177/0094306115588484
  56. Van Oort M. (2015). Making the neoliberal precariat: two faces of job searching in Minneapolis. Ethnography, 16(1): 74-94. DOI: 10.1177/146613811350663

  • Un chômage sans recherche d’emploi ? Une zone d’ombre dans la littérature sociologique sur les expériences du chômage Didier Demazière, Alizée Delpierre, in Sociologie du travail /2022
    DOI: 10.4000/sdt.41644

Didier Demazière, Marc Zune, Unemployed people facing future work: analyzing occupational expectations as ‘feasible work in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 161/2021, pp 173-192, DOI: 10.3280/SL2021-161009